Sarkus: You're years behind where you'd need to be to weigh in knowledgably on the matter of Tiassa's bullshit, in this particular instance. You seem to be under the impression that this thread, here, is another one that's about your ethical failure in regard to declaring any vested interest you might have in Bitcoin. That's a mistake. This thread is not about that. In fact, I split off an entirely separate thread for discussion about that matter (as if it needs any more discussion). This one is, as it says, about Tiassa's lies and false accusations: inappropriate ad hominem attacks he made on me. I doubt you can make any relevant contribution to this thread. I have addressed all the "issues raised" at length in previous public threads, in private threads in the Moderators' forum and in personal messages. Tiassa's personal attacks on me are based on claims he knows are false. He is knowingly telling lies about me. He is an actor who only wants to hurt. The "issues" he raises are illusions he has created, a confected set of half-truths and outright lies. He knows this, because I have, in the past, responded to him in good faith, in sufficient detail so he could understand. I have directly addressed his "concerns" on multiple occasions. For reasons best known to himself, he chooses to tell lies. Moreover, he has chosen to do so in the public forums, which is the only reason you're reading this. This thread should not exist. It is wrong on multiple levels. It is entirely inappropriate. Tiassa should be ashamed of his appalling behaviour. If he had an ounce of decency, he would apologise for his lies. But then again, if he had an ounce of decency, he wouldn't keep telling them in the first place. First time might be an innocent mistake. 20th time, no way. Indeed. Certain members also have their heads too stuck up to contemplate that their habitual behaviours might be an issue, too. I believe Tiassa has touched on that with Seattle. So far, you're poodling along scott free. Maybe Tiassa will address you at some point, too, in regards to your habits. Or, maybe the enemy of my enemy is a convenient friend substitute. We'll see - or maybe not. If you have spent any time perusing Tiassa's posts, you'll have noticed that Tiassa tends to talk around points rather than directly making them. He invites you to draw inferences and read things in, rather than saying them directly. As a result, in this particular case, you don't even know what "standard" he was referring to. You're just seeing what you want to see, thinking this is somehow about you. You're way out of your depth.