More alleged moon hoax evidence

Shameless trolling. How can anyone with a braincell look at those completely irrefutable examples and carry on spamming on a different forum? I cannot understand at all the mentality of somebody who does this day in, day out when the evidence clearly shows they are hopelessly wrong.

Do you actually understand the laws of gravity? In a vacuum and over short distances and minimal air resistance an object will rise to its highest point at the same time and speed as it takes to then fall back to the surface.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Are you crazy? Do you know what happens when you shut a door? Or drop a lid on a box? The air is pushed in the direction of the lid, air displacement, with far lesser spillage to the sides. The video on the Moon with dust absolutely everywhere simply shows a tiny puff in the corner (from impact) with no air moving all that dust. You are in complete denial if you cannot understand why this must be in a vacuum.

Forgetting about how idiotic your reply is, with magical "bouncing dust" it is completely irrelevant. From the footage it is completely clear that the wave of dust kicked up by his boots is level with the underside of them. That irrefutably proves that it must then come down at the same speed, which is what we see.

The implication of this is the "correction" needed now to make the dust fall at terrestrial freefall means Cernan is moving like Charlie Chaplin on steroids! If you deny this through lack of understanding, go and get educated. If you deny it for any other reason, you are once again in complete denial.

You seem oblivious to the fact that all of a sudden, we have this magic wall of air supposedly pushing a nylon flag, when a far clearer and provable one moves no dust at all in example 1 above!

You are like a child snatching his ball and running away when it has been punctured a thousand times. The animation proves, once again irrefutably, that light on his visor is as narrow or smaller than the width of the rod that passes in front of it. The implication for this is that now there is no idiotic "superlight" to explain away the miles and miles of evenly lit terrain with dark skies. If you do not understand the significance of this, you are in complete denial.

Why do you think that fool Kaysing would know anything? He was never part of the Apollo program and took up his vindictive and misguided claims to get back at the USA for Vietnam.

Same as example 1. From the footage it is completely clear that the wave of dust kicked up by his boots is level with the underside of them. That irrefutably proves that it must then come down at the same speed, which is what we see.

The implication of this is the "correction" needed now to make the dust fall at terrestrial freefall means Young is jumping in an absurd way! If you deny this through lack of understanding, go and get educated. If you deny it for any other reason, you are once again in complete denial.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.