My Cosmology

Status
Not open for further replies.
river said:
Has been closed

Yet no good reason has been provided by JamesR

Explain to us all , your good reason for doing so . JamesR
Click to expand...

paddoboy said:
At a guess probably one of the following.....
partly word salad?
partly nonsense?
partly gobblydook?
partly made up fairy tales?
partly bullshit?
Or perhaps as James has said, rubbish.
Click to expand...

origin said:
The problem is not that your statements goe against the mainstream, the problem is that your statements are little more than gibberish.
Click to expand...

DaveC426913 said:
JamesR provided his reasons in post 158 of that thread:

"Even for the Pseudoscience forum, this thread looks like a waste of everybody's time. river obviously has very little idea what a scientific theory looks like. This could be stupidity or it could be trolling; it's a bit hard to tell. Either way, it looks like the time to close this thread is fast approaching."
Click to expand...

paddoboy said:
PS: Gullible nonsensical fairy tales such as you impose on this forum, do not need any scientific reply, that you would obviously ignore anyway. [or it be way over your head]
Click to expand...
 
river said:
But typical of you throw out insults , rather than scienitific objections to my theory .
Click to expand...

I really think Paddoboy would enjoy providing scientific objections and move in that direction River but you must appreciate your style of writing leaves us nothing to discuss in so far as you fail to present enough of your idea that any one can get their teeth into.

You should not expect much more than you have been getting if you make short statements that merely hint at something more and expect members to guess all of what you may be thinking and then expect them to present scientific arguements as you call for.

And I doubt if anyone here enjoys falling back to name calling when a possible discussion simply cant get off the ground because your readers are left in the dark.

Personally I have confidence in you that you could be more expressive but the only way we can know is if you try a little harder to present your cosmology.

Perhaps a fresh start...write down for us your idea...start again in other words.

But if you find this thread is closed be prepared to accept responsibilty that you left James no other option...it will be your fault ...no one elses.

Look how long this one has been running and you have not really presented anything to discuss.

And please be welcoming to Paddoboy as we need him to be here more than he needs to be here.
Alex
 
Xelasnave.1947 said:
I really think Paddoboy would enjoy providing scientific objections and move in that direction River but you must appreciate your style of writing leaves us nothing to discuss in so far as you fail to present enough of your idea that any one can get their teeth into.

You should not expect much more than you have been getting if you make short statements that merely hint at something more and expect members to guess all of what you may be thinking and then expect them to present scientific arguements as you call for.

And I doubt if anyone here enjoys falling back to name calling when a possible discussion simply cant get off the ground because your readers are left in the dark.

Personally I have confidence in you that you could be more expressive but the only way we can know is if you try a little harder to present your cosmology.

Perhaps a fresh start...write down for us your idea...start again in other words.

But if you find this thread is closed be prepared to accept responsibilty that you left James no other option...it will be your fault ...no one elses.

Look how long this one has been running and you have not really presented anything to discuss.

And please be welcoming to Paddoboy as we need him to be here more than he needs to be here.
Alex
Click to expand...

Questions , Questions

I have NO need for pad .
 
river said:
Explain it again , to me
Click to expand...

paddoboy said:
At a guess probably one of the following.....
partly word salad?
partly nonsense?
partly gobblydook?
partly made up fairy tales?
partly bullshit?
Or perhaps as James has said, rubbish.
!
Click to expand...

origin said:
The problem is not that your statements goe against the mainstream, the problem is that your statements are little more than gibberish.
Click to expand...
DaveC426913 said:
JamesR provided his reasons in post 158 of that thread:

"Even for the Pseudoscience forum, this thread looks like a waste of everybody's time. river obviously has very little idea what a scientific theory looks like. This could be stupidity or it could be trolling; it's a bit hard to tell. Either way, it looks like the time to close this thread is fast approaching."
Click to expand...
 
river said:
Not many will understand where I'm coming from , and initially neither did many understand Einstein
Click to expand...
No one will understand if you dont explain things River.
Your comment re Einstein would be found to be incorrect for those who understood science and math as he spoke using known terms and built upon well delevoped ideas.

Many folk clain that they are misunderstood whatever and cite famous people as being misunderstood but the fact is they were understood...their ideas may have been new, the ideas may have been unusual but as all these folk used well understood terms and built upon earlier math in support of their equations anyone with a education in the field would understand exactly what was being said.
The different between you and Einstein is perhaps he knew what he was talking about and prepared to set out his hypothisis together with observations and formulas moreove presenting a scientific theory where as you dont not even set out your idea such that your readers can understand the basics of your idea.

If you put in the work others do when building to presenting a theory that would be a good start....

Anyways I hope you are well.

Alex
 
river said:
Not many will understand where I'm coming from , and initially neither did many understand Einstein
Click to expand...
I do understand where you are coming from, and its entirely fabricated in your imagination and gullibility in accepting anything that opposes mainstream, no matter how bizarre and stupid, just for the sake of it.
ps; While they may have laughed at Galileo [certainly not Einstein whose SR and GR were accepted in relatively short time frames] they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
 
Xelasnave.1947 said:
No one will understand if you dont explain things River.
Your comment re Einstein would be found to be incorrect for those who understood science and math as he spoke using known terms and built upon well delevoped ideas.

Many folk clain that they are misunderstood whatever and cite famous people as being misunderstood but the fact is they were understood...their ideas may have been new, the ideas may have been unusual but as all these folk used well understood terms and built upon earlier math in support of their equations anyone with a education in the field would understand exactly what was being said.
The different between you and Einstein is perhaps he knew what he was talking about and prepared to set out his hypothisis together with observations and formulas moreove presenting a scientific theory where as you dont not even set out your idea such that your readers can understand the basics of your idea.

If you put in the work others do when building to presenting a theory that would be a good start....

Anyways I hope you are well.

Alex
Click to expand...

While I agree , They are just not ready for my theory . Their not .

Look at the reactions so far . No open mindedness at all .

Hope you are improving

river
 
river said:
Not many will understand where I'm coming from , and initially neither did many understand Einstein
Click to expand...
The difference, River, is that Einstein was well-versed in science. He built on top of it, he didn't turn his back on it.

The only way one can possibly think outside the box - is to first learn where the walls of the box are.
 
river said:
While I agree , They are just not ready for my theory . Their not .
Look at the reactions so far . No open mindedness at all .
Click to expand...
And when will all us poor close minded fools of science be ready for your revelations?
Perhaps if you could show some reason, for your claims, some evidence, some reason why GR and the BB are not valid within their zones of applicability. But you don't, and you never do, because you are unable to. But at the same time you expect everyone just to sit back and accept it as factual, and you as some sort of wise, profound human being because of your "supposed" greater knowledge?

And of course you do not have a theory...at least not a scientific one.
 
paddoboy said:
And when will all us poor close minded fools of science be ready for your revelations?
Perhaps if you could show some reason, for your claims, some evidence, some reason why GR and the BB are not valid within their zones of applicability. But you don't, and you never do, because you are unable to. But at the same time you expect everyone just to sit back and accept it as factual, and you as some sort of wise, profound human being because of your "supposed" greater knowledge?

And of course you do not have a theory...at least not a scientific one.
Click to expand...

Then go back to my original thread of my cosmology , and read through it . What I propose .

There you will find what your looking for .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top