My theory 1 step at a time

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Pincho Paxton, Dec 10, 2011.

  1. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    Just found out that an Electron is a negative mass particle. So weight is actually Gravity entering an electron. In which case the Higgs Boson is actually Gravity. And Gravity is space-time flow. Time is Gravity Scale.

    Things sure get mixed up.

    I like that...

    TIME = Gravity Scale
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2011
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. prometheus viva voce! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,045
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    How did you come to that conclusion?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    What come first the chicken or the egg? Neither for the rooster bet them to it!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    Because he's a moron and he doesn't know a damn thing about science.
     
  9. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    I see plenty of sites discussing whether there is such a thing as time and no one really could describe what it was, other than they knew it measurements.
    It is courageous of PP to even guess what it is. I don't have the foggiest idea of how he came to his conclusion.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  10. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    I just told you.
    Essentially all he's doing is making shit up.
    He can't demonstrate or substantiate one single piece of it.
     
  11. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    Well electrons are holes in my theory because electrons are negative. Atoms are containers. Gravity flows into holes, so it flows into electrons. Gravity has to escape so it scales down into negative mass. From the electron hole comes a virtual particle due to Gravity scaling down, the hole is now large enough for the virtual particle to escape. The virtual particle is time. With velocity the forward motion of atoms fills the hole faster, the virtual particle escapes more slowly because Gravity cannot scale down fast enough. So time therefore is dependent on the speed which gravity can scale down. If Gravity cannot scale down fast enough you get a bow shock.
     
  12. arfa brane call me arf Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,731
    What about positrons?
    You realise that positive and negative charge are only conventional? "Negatively" charged electrons have the same amount of charge as "positively" charged positrons; that is, their charges are equal and opposite.

    Electrons aren't "negative" at all. And they certainly aren't "holes", not when they diffuse through semiconductors at least (which is something electrons do).
     
  13. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    I liked one part of that when you said
    Not that I'm saying you could be correct, but it seems like the ultimate "Tick" of the Universe. That is the rate at which virtual particles are needed to maintain the orbit of the electron around the Hydrogen Atom. There is a calculation of orbital speed and wavelength (as in the old Bohr model). But however you think the electron behaves I'd say there is the need for these virtual particles to maintain the relationship to the proton.
    So How do you see the electron maintaining this relationship to the proton?
     
  14. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    Holes are particles of negative mass. At the quantum scale they bump together like particles, but pass through positive mass. So for example Neutrinos are holes, they pass through solid matter, yet can bump into negative mass holes... they bump into Nucleus of atoms. Electrons are definitely holes of negative mass.

    The Charge of electrons is the cloud, and it's not the electron. The cloud is something else, I'm not sure what it is. It's almost perfectly spherical so its very small.. could be gravity.
     
  15. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    Electrons maintain orbit because of The Kissing Problem. They stack in the standard formation. 6 holes, around 1 hole. The orbit that is observed is more likely the flow of gravity through the holes. Not a true orbit at all.

    I have a reason for the virtual particles anyway. They are scale 1..

    1 + -1 = 0

    And scale 1 is always waiting to fit in a scale 1 hole. This is because scale 1 is the most fundamental particle. It is the particle that is allowed to appear into our Universe. I have worked out some of the standard formation of the Universe, and it has a pattern.
     
  16. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    They can fire a beam of electrons into a container and weigh them and they have mass, positive mass, so you might want to think about this "negative mass" concept and Just call it negative charge. Then that would align with reality better.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  17. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    But they are weighing Gravity not the electron. And the charge isn't the electron either. I could call them anti-matter. But negative mass is what they are. I like this... call them negative mass. Call mass weight. In my theory negative charge would not cause a pull. Attraction is impossible, else you ruin Dark Matter. You can only move into a hole because you are pushed from behind, and this is very important. If you have attraction you have no Dark Matter, the direction is wrong. The force needs to be in the right place to create a bubble, and that force is a push from behind. Then you also get the Kissing Problem which is also very important.
     
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2011
  18. arfa brane call me arf Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,731
    Call Xenu on the space phone. . .
     
  19. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    What's the number?:shrug:
     
  20. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    37,550
    Pincho Paxton:

    You missed half my questions.

    How is scale measured? What equipment do I use?

    How does scale "convert to time"?

    A bump of what?
    What does the bump do?
    How do these bumps affect time?
    Please show me the mathematics that predicts the amount by which time slows down.

    Please give an example of the release of small particles from a larger particle.

    What is an overlap hole? What does it overlap?

    How can gravity be forced to overlap? What is gravity?

    Are you saying that when gravity overlaps it releases small particles from a larger particle? Please give an example.

    How does scale cause time?

    How would we test these things?

    What is 0?

    What causes things to scale UP or DOWN?

    How can you calculate the amount of dark matter out-flow from something?
     
  21. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    It feels a bit like watching a skilled magician performing card tricks, you sort of know it isn't possible but you don't know how it is done. Moving things around, going through holes, bumping, kissing problem, dark matter, dark energy , dark mysterious forces, and the weight of gravity.
    All quite mysterious in fact.
     
  22. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    I wish I had a faster computer to run my simulator. I can't get a grant as a programmer.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2011
  23. prometheus viva voce! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,045
    Why don't you post your code up on here so people can run it on their own machines, or would that make it obvious to everyone that the answer to James' questions is always "I pulled it out of my ass?"
     

Share This Page