NASA deceive American school children

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by HawkI, Feb 20, 2021.

  1. HawkI Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    335
    NASA ask young students to come up with a 'new name' for their latest robots. But in reality, the devices have been christened beforehand. Statistically, soo many nouns get suggested by the naive, that one one of them is bound to match.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,606
    Those bastards at NASA, how could they do this to our youths.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    exchemist and HawkI like this.
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    So I'm still in with a shout on Botty McBotface?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. HawkI Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    335
    If NASA behind closed doors come up with such a name before asking the public for a 'new name' for their 'unnamed new machine' then yes.
     
  8. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,023
    HawkI likes this.
  9. Janus58 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,301
    Not for the Deep_Impact probe, But I did for the Insight Mars lander ( One perk is that I'm pretty sure that my name will be be the only instance of that first and last name combination. While I do have a quite common first name, I have an uncommon last name. Such that there is only one other person in the US which shares my First/Last names, and he is a distant relative.)
     
    foghorn likes this.
  10. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,086
    How do you know this?
     
  11. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,269
    how it works is fairly simple
    they have a general range of names
    types of names & similar names
    the name that comes closest to one of those groupings of names becomes the name

    they are not about to allow someone to name it "anal explorer 1" just because that person was 1st or last

    ...

    dont allow your imagination to get abducted by aliens

    delux editors choice
    high light reel
    . . .

    what is in a name ...
     
  12. HawkI Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    335
    A whistle blower among NASA entrusted in me to get the truth out there. They wish to remain anonymous.
     
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2021
  13. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,086
    So, another "Hawkiism" then.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    HawkI likes this.
  14. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,269
    you specifically said
    which is a religious process

    are you talking about a religious process ?
    or
    a naming process
    they are 2 completely different things
    10 year old children build conspiracy theory's of why the smart empathic kids get to guess the correct name for something they wanted to name "big poop"

    they then whine & complain and say the world is not fair and against them, then they go outside a beat up another kid to steal their lunch money and get a power trip
    then they become child predators and incels and nazis and politicians or conspiracy theorists
     
  15. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,086
    It started that way, but is no longer a religious ceremony.

    Christen: dedicate (a vessel, building, etc.) ceremonially.

    Plenty of references online that describe christening without any religious aspect.
     
  16. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,269
    christ enabling

    nasa when it was constructed was comprised of the American christian people
    its religion was Christianity
    nasa has always been inherently leaned toward Christianity because the majority religion & culture has been christian

    anyone with half a brain who has followed space technology should know this
    which suggests hawkls thread is some type of religious trolling
    or is a conspiracy theory wrapped inside a conspiracy theory

    additionally to add to hawkl attempted conspiracy theory of a conspiracy theory of a religious troll process
    just because someone has been "blessed" aka christened, does not mean it can not then be named

    from my reading most religions have various naming process that never create an ultimate non changing name process

    so this on a religious concept places another concept of conspiracy inside hawkls conspiracy

    which now begs the question
    is hawkl a religious person? a communist ?
    an anarchist ?
    because the motive of the nature of controlling the debate narratives has become the thing


    what you re obviously not aware of, is
    some Christians will take it upon themselves to have secret christenings of such things.
    such a behavior does not intimidate my own spiritual beliefs
    be they indigenous or imperialist introduced religions

    hawkls use of the religious word while deliberately mixing it with "naming"
    in a science debate area
    is clearly defining a conspiracy of religious definition

    but
    the real world reality is little different to feeling emotionally injured by someone giving a prey to a launching rocket
    to exploit that association to a child domain is a bit divisive

    disingenuous or deliberately manipulative to engage what about children ?

    you think you smell smoke when i see the fire

    psychological baiting
    children
    rights
    Christianity
    rights to self validation
    anarchy

    conspiracy inside the conspiracy inside the conspiracy of a conspiracy ...
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2021
  17. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,086
  18. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,269
    the alt right have been targeting nasa for decades
    using the conservative christians anti science support to undermine science in schools & destabilize nasa as a Government science organization while stealing their funding.

    so the question is who is hawkl

    so this idea to try & create a beat up of nasa & create a conspiracy they are attacking school children is very vile
    & is probably alt-right conservative christians looking for an out while texans die from lack of social services and to divert attention away from government funding of utilities

    they will feed this bullshit to their followers to keep them on the hook like smack addicts
     
  19. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,269
    not very original for a conspiracy theory
     
  20. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,269
    technically that's defamation of a USA govt agency which is involved in vital & critical education of children
    as well as globally critical scientific research & development


    the burden of proof becomes the question to substantiate such a claim
    AND you would need to prove a motive to an ends of what they are attempting to trick school children into believing or how they are tricking them with proof.

    your theory is lacking motive.
     
  21. HawkI Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    335

    I simply wanted to use another word for naming, that means the same thing. A thesaurus makes writing more interesting.


    I promised NASA employee, Stooge Straw Man, that his identity is safe with me.

    Their motive is to brainwash the children who randomly get the right names into a life time of wanting to work for NASA. Did you see the boy and girl who got the right names recently? They were saying in an almost robotic voice 'Ever.... Since.... I..... Named.... It.... I..... Want.... To..... Be..... In..... That..... Room.'
     
  22. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,023
    In my dictionary under ''Hawkiism'' it reads...'' You can believe me when I say this because this guy I know told me so. Often followed by 'mum's the word' and tapping side of nose gesture'' .
     
    DaveC426913, HawkI and exchemist like this.
  23. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,086
    Hawki: so you see the problem with having too much fun. The problem is called Poe's Law:

    "without a clear indicator of the author's intent, it is impossible to create a parody of extreme views so obviously exaggerated that it cannot be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of the views being parodied."

    For example:
     
    HawkI likes this.

Share This Page