new physics model

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by RJBeery, Sep 23, 2016.

  1. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,136
    ajanta likes this.
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dr_Toad It's green! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    What's wrong with the current working model that your hand-waving bullshit addresses?
     
    Truck Captain Stumpy likes this.
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,136
    The "current working model" isn't a single model. Did you read the paper? Just jump to the conclusion if you're feeling impatient.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Dr_Toad It's green! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    I read the conclusion after I saw your ridiculous embracing of the van der Mark contortions that "describe" the electron.

    Bullshit is still bullshit.
     
    Truck Captain Stumpy likes this.
  8. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,643
    Do you mean your model reconciles GR and QM?
     
  9. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,136
    Well it isn't complete enough to do that but the model does incorporate relativity, exhibit quantum and wavelike behavior, and is objectively real.
     
  10. Dr_Toad It's green! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Truck Captain Stumpy likes this.
  11. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    30,015
    Is this an Alternative Theory?
     
    Truck Captain Stumpy likes this.
  12. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,136
    The EM mass concept is widely discussed in physics in a variety of publications. My addition is the exploration of locality which I encourage you to read.
     
  13. Dr_Toad It's green! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Why would anyone read your version of fantasy and treat it with with anything but ridicule, you flippin' crank?
     
    Truck Captain Stumpy likes this.
  14. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,219
    Yes.
     
  15. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,136
    It's not an alternative theory to Special Relativity, it's a model for it that would display both quantum and wave-like behavior.
     
  16. Dr_Toad It's green! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Woo. Tell us less. Pop-science cargo-cult Farsightish total crap.

    If you've got something worthy of investigation, you wouldn't be here spamming this basura.
     
    Truck Captain Stumpy likes this.
  17. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,219
    You have squarely rejected time dilation based on relative speed. You have redefined gamma factor.

    So this calls for some observational evidence, because you surely are side stepping SR, without even suggesting a problem with SR.
     
  18. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,219
    Let the Mods handle it, don't soil it with your crappish outburst.
     
  19. Dr_Toad It's green! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    What, is your diaper full as well?

    What is the point of amateurs and wannabes puffing up and dressing up as scientists as though they have half a fucking clue on a public forum in the first place?

    Why are you defending an argument that a pile of manure could defeat in a fair debate?

    Shut the fuck up.
     
    Truck Captain Stumpy likes this.
  20. Dr_Toad It's green! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Maybe the moderators will handle it, but it won't be as friendly as I'd like it.

    You are a fool.
     
    Truck Captain Stumpy likes this.
  21. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,219

    Pitiable.
    He has put up his essay, identifying himself and his association, that shows his sincerity.

    People like you spread nonsense on such public forums without any kind of positive contribution. Why the authority here allow such people to post here on science forum, is incomprehensible.

    I am not defending an argument, I am castigating you. Stay away if you have nothing positive to contribute.
     
  22. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Many here have been asking that question of yourself for quite a while now.
     
    Truck Captain Stumpy likes this.
  23. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,219

    Why defend a person who is abusive? Did you not see toad posts here? Have some character strength Paddoboy, leave this boy tag and behave like a man.
     
    Ultron likes this.

Share This Page