no i do i as opposed to? identity? gotta be with regards to something, ja? it is a necessity animate or inanimate the perspectives are distinct tho and it is my impression you mix and match sociology and consciousness i need to dig up article kinda like we are nothing without feedback /pinch me
I see. It's not that bad. Most major manufactures can make a pretty decent electron microsocope and with regular maintenance and a spare, you aren't going to see alot of mis-observations from malfunction. Of course I do, because I can inject a certain type of information into myself and turn off my perception. If I was interested, I would ask the person how the red ball got there... just like we use science to ask reality how something happened.
Go for it. You can throw those assumptions away once you've completed the task. Sounds like some mighty incoherent reasoning. And you didn't provide evidence that "nothing" exists.
Wouldn't a particle in superposition be no thing. In fact isn't it silly to refer to it as a particle or anything really. (hey, what the hell, I like a challenge)
lol So you'd base your conclusions on your perception of their perception? I hope science works slightly better than this.
I'm sorry that my reasoning is unacceptable, oh great one. Perhaps you could show me the error of my ways by demonstrating the existence of anything outside of my perception. Simple enough task, for you, anyway, right?
science? based on axiomatic formulations agreed upon by a consensus of opinion certitude? go to religion
Me too. Happens every night when I sleep. Epiphenomena of a functioning brain. I see all matters of existence as all or none. Everything else is on a gradient. Check your statement "...no more energy is required to GENERATE...". That's exactly a requirement to generate... an expenditure of energy. For a human adult, thats an immense amount of joules. Boom! Crater. Flickering between nothing and something? Forget the crater. The universe would be repeatedly blasted to smitherines. Consequently "Not I" would be an inversion of you (which is something),
So the experiencing self, that sifted through its experience and discovered all the ideas in both religion and science is merely epi. In fact it even came up with the idea that it is peripheral. This last ought to count for something.
We can observe today that reality was quite present before humans; therefore, if humans bite the dust reality will remain quite present.