Ozone Hole Reduced

Discussion in 'Earth Science' started by wet1, Feb 12, 2002.

  1. wet1 Wanderer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,616

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Ozone Hole Reduced
    Credit: SVS, TOMS, NASA
    Although a new ozone hole has formed again this year over the South Pole, this time it is a little bit smaller than the year before. Ozone is important because it shields us from damaging ultraviolet sunlight. Ozone is vulnerable, though, to CFCs and halons being released into the atmosphere. International efforts to reduce the use of these damaging chemicals really are having a positive effect on their atmospheric abundance. This year, however, the slightly reduced size of the ozone hole is mostly due to relatively mild weather, which reduces the efficiency of ozone depletion. In the above false-color picture taken earlier this month, low ozone levels are shown in blue.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Hevene Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    369
    Still a good news for the people lives in Australia and the surrounding area.....

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2002
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Gifted World Wanderer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,113
    It's a natural cycle, hopefully we'll be able to see a few more to prove that that.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Edufer Tired warrior Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    791
    During the years of high CFCs usage, the amount of CFCs produced was about 1,100,000 tons a year. The estimated chlorine contained in the CFCs released to the atmosphere was estimated at 7,500 tons a year. Let's compare some facts about yearly chlorine input to the atmosphere:

    Provided by CFCs: 7,500 tons
    By Ocean biota: 5,000,000 tons
    By biomass burning: 8,400,000 tons
    By Volcanoes: 36,000,000 tons
    Chlorine provided by Seawater: 600,000,000

    total of man-made chlorine: <b>7,500 tons</b>
    total of naturally produced chlorine: <b>649,400,000 tons.</b>

    And some guys got a Nobel Prize because they insisted that 7,500 tons of chlorine can make more damage than 649 Million tons! This speaks very poorly about the standards used by the Swedish Academy of Sciences for evaluating "junkscience".

    This would be a laughable matter --if it were not a catastrophic event for mankind. The Ozone scare was the spearhead of the cataract of unscientific claims on environmental issues that came later.

    Someone in the board asked for a scientific reference to the amount of chlorine and other gases emitted by the Mount Erebus volcano in Antarctica. Here it is:

    W.I. Rose, R.I. Chuan, and P.R. Kyle, 1985, "Rate of Sulphur Dioxide Emission from Erebus Volcano, Antarctica, December 1983", <i>Nature</i>, Vol. 318 (Aug. 22), pp. 710-712.
     
  8. Gifted World Wanderer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,113
    Edufer, could you provide me with a link to your source of information? I'd really appreciate it.
     

Share This Page