personality theory based on archetypes

Well you’re wrong about that cus since we last spoke I’ve had a group home supervisor with a bachelors in psychology helping me with the test with the validity testing idea

And an office counselor who showed my work to Udc and they are responsible for the test being smaller and the number sequence being changed

So people are taking it seriously

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I have clearly been using people with more school Than me to get other people interested over the years

I have no problem admitting that

And it started with [personally identifying information deleted] the child shrink and that led to [personally identifying information deleted] the office counselor which led to Udc which led to [personally identifying information deleted] the group home supervisor which has led to some others

People have accused me of just piggyback on others snd being too lazy to do the work myself but I’ve gottten results

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

And if I’m honest I can Admit I’m not disciplined enough at this point to go back to school

But so what getting results is getting results these guys have gotten my foot in the door and that’s what counts

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

8 years ago
how did it go ?

what country is "here" ?

"results" does not prove it is a good system to be applied to anything
"results" also does not mean you are not "piggy backing"

you can get results by hitting someone with a stick
"results" is a cause & effect concept of "effect"

in my own work i identified 14 different personality archetypes with a possible 2 to 4 more

please note i am reading through your thread and posting as i read

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

please note
if you feel emotionally hurt by something i have posted
you are miss interpreting it
please ask me to explain further for you.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

and also please note
while i am happy to discuss some aspects of my own study into psychology
i am not about to divulge things
but i am happy to discuss yours and maybe if i can help by highlighting something or helping you to look at something from a different perspective.

and also please note
pedophiles, sadists, human slave traders, cult members and cult leaders will be reading this
so keep that in mind
THAT is the nature of public discussion access, ANYONE and everyone has access to it
and as with many things
those whom have more determination are often those with worst intent to use what ever it is.
guns bombs soldiers slaves technology etc

point & example comments like this raise red flags

pediatric & human-developmental psychology should have no monetary drive or purpose
merchandising it into a sales packet is to turn the knowledge into pedophile tools

what you "Want" or "Don't want" is completely irrelevant to if, how, when & why other people will & may use what ever you have handed them or given them access to, to exploit, enslave brain wash or abuse others.
be that listed or labelled under any heading of capitalism, socialism or religion or freedom of information or free speech or charitable gestures.

it all becomes mute when YOU are the one who has enabled that person to be killed, enslaved sexual abused or tortured or scammed.
it IS your fault.

 

I was a paraprofessional for 12 years in DCPS

Dc public schools the Washington DC public school system

I retired few years ago

I never got any traction with DCPS it’s too much red tape to test things on students

But as far as getting colleges interested it’s been better and independent therapists counselors outside of DCPS

 

It’s a public school system so even if you have connections the amount of red tape you’re having to go through to get permission to do anything is ridiculous everything has to be run by parents teachers countless administrators

The best way for my work was colleges independent counselors and shrinks and even private schools they would at least give me an audience

 

It reconfigures some archetypes and some of the types found on the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)

which edition ?

i probably should but i have not read them all

a good excuse has always trumped a good reason for preventative culture change
such is the reducing element of human biological drives

you say

why 3 ?
humans are far more complex than 3
& i have not read anything on the nature of 3 mathematics to suggest any core attribute
other than religion and conceptual materialist associations from the individuation process
which i would expect you to be well past at this point of the discussion.

please explain your reasoning and formation of "3 symbols"
deriving the result

i shall stop posting at this point to give you a chance to catch up to my posting of questions.

?

 

The archetypes are what make it interesting and different

It’s a pseudoscience which is why I assume that guy Dave has been following me around in here being a hater and trash talker

Outside of that it’s just a laundry list of personality disorders/ mental health stuff typical shrinks deal with on a daily basis

If you take away the archetypes it’s just the dsm or a narrowed down version of the dsm

 

That isn’t to say I’m a fraud I still had to be instructed on how to do reliability testing by the child shrink


There was a scientific way of coming up with the reliability testing

 

It’s not hard to explain

There are just certain archetypes or archetypes combinations that just line up with certain personality disorders

They just the archetypes spell out certain disorders very clearly

 

piggy backing
versus
being pre determined to a set range of outcomes
like tying one of your feet to a wheel then saying no one can run faster than the speed of the wheel

this reads a bit like dogma
while i ignore what looks like obvious christian religion over tones in your base thinking model

dominant
versus influential
versus
labels to make life easier for others at the patients expense

is your terminology flawed here or are you being lazy ?

dominant influences are not always larger in symbology
"most" is a subjective term
you need clinical terms
placing the word "most" in is like placing a post-it-note on your forehead saying "i am an idiot"

i think your being lazy
you simply CAN NOT be lazy for science
it turns your car around and drives you in the opposite direction.

ok
so that is a fairly large claim inside a set of versed justifiers

please list prominent emotional conditions beside non definitive disorders so i can clearly see you have not attached them to disorders to emotionalise a disorder.
(a common bi-polar disorder type of thinking)

if you are bi-polar
then you MUST learn to understand it so it helps you as much as it hinders you.
being on the spectrum and then giving it license is ok for creativity
but allowing it to hammer your science outcomes to make things easier for you is probably a sign your being pushed or pushing too hard when you need to be thinking longer on the subject.

further reading which i wont highlight
Soo...
i am reading your kumbaya script

why do i want warm fuzys ? what are you selling ?
you let your desire for outcomes cloud your science
natural
but critically influential
and here-in-lies the question around your religious beliefs .... ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

("histrionic personality disorder " you mean schizophrenia? i notice you have not mentioned it, i wonder why)
and yet you define gender to
"the wise old man"
...
creates more questions than it answers
refer back around to above question about your personal religious beliefs

this seems like a big leap/statement

what age range are you referring to ?

10 year old child ?
girl or boy ?

so just to make sure we are 100% on the same page
8 year old boy
10 year old girl
1 is a sociopath ?
1 is a narcissist ?

or is that you holding up flash cards making labels building some type of maslovs hierarchy of personality
please explain further how these terms relate to an
8 year old boy
and an 8 year old girl

you can assign them both to be living in mixed co-ed familys and co-ed schools at the same school
both starting sex ed
if that makes it easier

...

 

I've got some sense of the topic from the last few posts

Not reinventing the wheel, just adding a little more decoration

Since he has retired I would suggest give brain a rest from what you have been working on, with little results it seems, and strike out to attempt something else

Keep going as you are can make you a stereotype bitter old man

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I’m not bipolar I’m actually an Entp

Which is intuitive extrovert aka high functioning narcissism

Those types are smart enough to read the room and master things quickly but charming enough to rely on and use others to compensate for weaknesses

Some people over the years have assumed I’m bipolar

I do get very angry when I don’t get what I want but that’s still not enough to goby.

My personal life definitely points to narcissism

 

are you drawing the wagons in a circle ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

i understand the subject may be quite difficult for you(and most others)
this is science it IS hard !

it will also be guaranteed to have triggers in it

but we are discussing science
not warm fuzys(im not anti warm fuzys)

attempted coercion of the subject type and content ...

assigning the worst possible group label and then waiving it as a threat
seeking group compliance
to control and divert the subject
...
pandering to fragile egos looking for stroking ?

keeping in mind the "air" of American culture dogma to avoid at all costs any discussion around religious thought paradigms of indoctrination and personality construction through nurture is as obvious as a red flag to a raging bull

who would argue personality is not influenced by religious culture in nurture ?

if we don't lift the hood
we never get to look at the engine
and its all about the engine

this is science it IS hard !

 

Self diagnosis as a professional in the field?

OR

Professional diagnosis from a professional in the field?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

i read that as self diagnosis
along with the "i am not bi-polar"
i read both as being self diagnosis

also both aligned with the leading premise of ideological frame work of the model proposed
so it is indeed slightly codified(as one would expect in any high functioning state)

i am fascinated by the subject
i rarely discuss it because of the massive amount of damage it can do to people by scammers & pedophiles

 

I'm a little lost

I was referring to Kimani (not yourself)

He appears to have spent what 8 years on some classification system (reinventing the wheel, just adding a little more) decoration with very little progress

Methinks move on

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

ok
my mistake

assuming it is not some type of new age christian scam self development envangelical derived thought process
i am interested in thier ideas around the personality achitypes for my own study

additionally and equally peoples perceptions of these things and how they translate them to complex thoughts of human thought

its one of my interests

regardless of the leaning of religion
im interested
regardless of them re inventing the wheel
im curious how they re invent it

the self admission of naval gazing intellect is not missed on me, by them.
but thats as christian as you get "i have sinned" etc etc

culture & how that influences personality & thinking is quite often an almost aromatic fragrance to archetype concept

american liberal educationalists tend to be a certain type of person
with a collection of specified concepts and beliefs and values
depending on what type of school(religion) they work for

unfortunately the sense of do no harm to be sued is an overt hobbling concept around many frames of advanced pediatric psychology in the working environment

i have no doubt that if your system has been designed around existing models then it will be translatable to existing models
as you say
copying concepts in the work place to give you better outcomes for your existing models and tools
is a better outcome
better outcomes become better simply by being a different way to do the same thing with children
more so in an ever growing environment of over saturation of senses while reducing direct cognitive control direction & manipulation(false knowledge)

 

& reverse engineering the DSM back to try and manipulate those minds whom wrote it
is not ideal in a less than ideal world

turning things into sales products ...
no money no food no life
i get it

but would you sell nuclear biological & chemicals weapons at any price to anyone ?

many would
and claim it was just the once
and say they cant be held accountable for how a terrorist uses what they sell them

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._jurisdictions_banning_conversion_therapy



more than 50% of the usa people choose to not ban psycho-sexual-religious-brain-washing of children

LONG way to go !