# Pi^3 = 31.00 62 7......7 integers

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by rr6, May 27, 2013.

1. Pi = 3.14 15 92....mathematical infinity..o8o

Pi^3 = 31.00 62 7.....7 integers

^3 = cubing or tetrahedroning 3rd powering volumetric values.

Humans have 31 bilateral( ergo 62 ) spinal nerves.

The icosa(20)hedron( regular/symmetrical primary structure ) has 31 primary great/equaltorial, bisecting circle-like planes( GrCP's ).

There exist two skew versions of icosa(20)hedron ergo 31 left and 31 right GrCP's

The twin set of 00 insures a distinct separation rational side 31 from the irrational side in addition to the decimal point .00 62 7....

2-3-5-7-11-13-17-19-23-29- and 31 is the 11th prime number

31 is a contiguous prime number for first six or 7 places....31,331, 3331 33331, 333331, 3333331.

r6

3. ### rpennerFully WiredValued Senior Member

Messages:
4,833
Gibberish. The last digits of pi are not 080 -- there are no such last digits.

$\pi^3 = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{32 (-1)^k }{( 2 k + 1 )^3 } = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{4^3 ( 48 k^2 + 48 k + 13 ) }{ \left( (4 k + 1) ( 4 k + 3 ) \right)^3 } = \frac{832}{3^3} + \frac{6976}{35^3} + \frac{19264}{99^3} + \frac{37696}{195^3} +\frac{62272}{323^3} + \frac{92992}{483^3} + \dots$ so $31 \frac{3}{478} \, \lt \, \pi^3 \, \lt \, 31 \frac{1}{159}$ and $\frac{1}{4939} \, \lt \, \frac{\pi^3}{31}-1 \, \lt \frac{1}{4938}$ No integers here.

Only if the quantity being cubed is a length.

So ? 31 is a small number, it will show up in a large number of places compared to a number like 123876349.

Even if what you assert is true, this does not follow. Your claim makes no sense since 31 is a ridiculous guess at the number of symmetries of an icosahedron.

There are no special "rational" and "irrational" parts to $\pi^3$. Even the infinite sum of positive rational numbers above gives an infinite number of ways to truncate the series, resulting in an infinite number of ways to split the sum into rational and irrational parts.

So? How is this more significant than saying 31 is prime? There are 25 primes under 100, so there are not very long odds for any two-digit number to be prime.

So?
If $a(n) = 1 + 30 \sum_{k=0}^{n} 10^k$ then obviously such a sequence can never be evenly divided by a factor of 30 (2, 3, and 5). But the sequence doesn't guarantee a prime or even a high probability of primes as it goes on:
$\begin{array}{rr|c} n & a(n) & \textrm{Factorization} \\ \hline \\ 0 & 31 & \textrm{Prime} \\ 1 & 331 & \textrm{Prime} \\ 2 & 3331 & \textrm{Prime} \\ 3 & 33331 & \textrm{Prime} \\ 4 & 333331 & \textrm{Prime} \\ 5 & 3333331 & \textrm{Prime} \\ 6 & 33333331 & \textrm{Prime} \\ 7 & 333333331 & 17 \times 19607843 \\ 8 & 3333333331 & 673 \times 4952947 \\ 9 & 33333333331 & 307 \times 108577633 \\ 10 & 333333333331 & 19 \times 83 \times 211371803 \\ 11 & 3333333333331 & 523 \times 3049 \times 2090353 \\ 12 & 33333333333331 & 607 \times 1511 \times 1997 \times 18199 \\ 13 & 333333333333331 & 181 \times 1841620626151 \\ 14 & 3333333333333331 & 199 \times 16750418760469 \end{array}$

5. The only gibberish is your thinking there is set of "last digits of pi". Infinite numbers do not have a set of "last digits". You need to change your attitude first and foremost as you appear troll -like to me.

3rd powering gives volumetric values. If you don't like the facts of my statements then move on.

I don't recall saying that "31 is a small number". It appears you have a bug your butt for no apparent reason. Please move along unless you can change your attitude.

If and when I state something that is not true or you want some more evidence to support please state either of both or just move along to somewhere else. Icosahedron has different kinds of symmetries and 31 is only related to one of many different symmetries. If you need supporting evidence for any statements by me you can ask.

Your seemingly pissy attitude is not needed around here.

I disagree. Numbers to the left of decimal point are whole rational numbers. Many times the irrational side of a number if less than .5 is consider insignificant so the number is rounded off to the whole rational side only.

The 00 is far less the.5 dude.

or even within the context of only the irrational side if the next number is less than 5 then the number previous number is rounded off as is. Your attitude is on becoming to me. Please move on.

Huh? How is what more significant. Where did I say something was more significant than something else in regards to 31 being the 11th prime. I stated a fact. Your attitude needs adjusting. imho

So I stated a fact as best as I could recall. If you can't handle the facts without having attitude then please move along.

R6

7. ### Beer w/StrawTranscendental Ignorance!Valued Senior Member

Messages:
6,541

In my estimation rr6 is a purveyor of useless bunk and I feel like reporting it.

8. ### Captain KremmenAll aboard, me Hearties!Valued Senior Member

Messages:
12,738
Everyone knows that the answer to "Life, the Universe and everything" is 42, not 31.
The works of Lewis Carroll are positive proof of this to anyone with a rational brain.

Examples of Carroll's use of 42:

Alice's Adventures in Wonderland has 42 illustrations.

Rule Forty-two in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland ("All persons more than a mile high to leave the court").

Rule 42 of the Code in the preface to The Hunting of the Snark ("No one shall speak to the Man at the Helm").

In "fit the first" of The Hunting of the Snark the Baker had "forty-two boxes, all carefully packed, With his name painted clearly on each."

The White Queen announces her age as "one hundred and one, five months and a day", which - if the best possible date is assumed for the action of Through the Looking-Glass - gives a total of 37,044 days. With the further (textually unconfirmed) assumption that both Queens were born on the same day their combined age becomes 74,088 days, which is 42 x 42 x 42. Some commentators have asserted that this is deliberate on Carroll's part.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(number)

If we agreed to make circles into annuluses, pi could be 3, and save everyone a lot of trouble.
The extra piece left over could be given to the poor.

Last edited: May 28, 2013
9. Pi^3 = 31.00 62 7........

Definitely a troll......as facts and truth causes them to dribble drivel on the reflection of themselves, those crossing the bridge above the trolls and the greater cosmos embraceing both.

Please move along to the nearest troll tavern Beer w/Straw in head.

rr6

10. Pi^3 = 31.00 62 7........cosmic information as finite enclosure and Pi

Pi^3 = 31.00 62 7.......

^3 = 3rd powering ergo cubing or tetrahedroning as volume.

The regular, 5/phi-fold icosa(20)hedrons 6, 10 and 15 total 31 great/equaltorial circle-like planes( GrCP's ).

However, those 10 GrCP's define 5 sets of 4-fold cubo-octa(8)hedra with each cubo-octahedron being defined by just 4, GrCP's.

The 4-fold cubo-octa(8)hedron also contains, 3,4, 6( tetrahedron ) and 12 GrCPp's.

So the 5-fold icosa(20)hedron contains, 3,4, 6( 4-fold ) 6( 5-fold ), 10, 12, 15 GrCP's.

The ico. and the cubo-oct. are defined by 12 vertexes.

Sitting above our 31 bilateral spinal nerves is 12 cranial nerves that originate in and around the brain stem that sits atop the spinal cord.

This above is a cosmic, primary, 7 axis set( 3, 4, 6, 6, 10, 12 and 15 ).

31, 331, 33 31, 33 33 1, 33 33 33 1, 33 33 33 31 continual prime of prime 31 and seven places of 3.

The torus has a cosmic maximum set of 7 areas/faces that can be mapped onto the torus.

For me, I think that Pi^3 contains information that tells us to STOP at this 3D set i.e. proceed not further into infinity and potential madness.

31 is the first clue, and then the dual zeros( 00 ) isolate the 31 even further away from proceeding on this infinite trajectory.

Then we have the 62 ergo potential bilateral left and right expression of 31. STOP.

Then, if all that was not enough, we get to the number 7--- a the 7th integer place ---and it has various cosmic implications that are associated with a cosmic primary and finite set.

I think there are other cosmic 7's Ive forgotten at this time.

2 - 3 - 5 - 7( 4th prime )

11 - 13 - 17

19 - 23 - 29 31( 11th prime )

37- 41- 43 -47( 15th prime )

53 - 59 - 61 - 67 - 71( 20th prime )

73 - 79 - 83 - 89 - 97( 25th prime )

101 - 103 - 107 - 109 - 113 - 127( 31st prime )

r6

11. ### Captain KremmenAll aboard, me Hearties!Valued Senior Member

Messages:
12,738
Here is another reason why 42 is better than 31.
Its importance in science.
42 is:

The atomic number of molybdenum. (But I will continue, if that is not proof enough.)

The angle rounded to whole degrees for which a rainbow appears (the critical angle).

In 1966, mathematician Paul Cooper theorized that the fastest, most efficient way to travel across continents would be to bore a straight hollow tube directly through the Earth, connecting a set of antipodes, remove the air from the tube and fall through. The first half of the journey consists of free-fall acceleration, while the second half consists of an exactly equal deceleration. The time for such a journey works out to be 42 minutes. Even if the tube does not pass through the exact center of the Earth, the time for a journey powered entirely by gravity (known as a gravity train) always works out to be 42 minutes, so long as the tube remains friction-free, as while the force of gravity would be lessened, the distance travelled is reduced at an equal rate. (The same idea was proposed, without calculation by Lewis Carroll in 1893 in "Sylvie and Bruno Concluded".
From Wiki

12. Prime 47

http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s12/p3830.html#1238.51
.."1258.51

Scheherazade Numbers: 47: The first prime number beyond the trigonometric limit-- of 45 degrees ---is 47.

The number 47 may be a flying increment to fill allspace, to fill out the eight triangular facets of the non-allspace-filling vector equilibrium to form the allspace-filling first nuclear cube.

If 47 as a factor produces a Scheherazade Number with mirrors, it may account not only for all the specks of dust in the Universe but for all the changes of cosmic restlessness, accounting the convergent-divergent next event, which unbalances the even and rational whole numbers.

If 47 as a factor does not produce a Scheherazade Number with mirrors, it may explain that there can be no recurring limit symmetries. It may be that 47 is the cosmic random element, the agent of infinite change."...

2-3( only consecutive primes )

5 - 7( first twin set )

11 - 13( 2nd twin set )

17 - 19( 3rd twin set )--17th being the 7th prime ---

23( first isolated prime )

29 - 31( 4th twin set )

37( 2nd isolated prime )

41- 43( 5th twin set )

47( 3rd isolated prime )

53( 4th isolated prime )

59 - 61( 6th twin set )

67( 5th isolated prime )

71 - 73( 7th twin set ) and 73 is sum-total number of great/equaltorial, circle-like planes( GrCP's ) after we substract the 14 from 87 that are congruent with each other i.e. 87 is the sum-total of primary planes/axi, however, since 14 of them are on congruent with each other we subtract 14 from 87 to arrive at the total of 73 primary GrCP's.

79( 6th isolated prime )

83( 7th isolated prime ) and is between the alternate total primary GrCP's of 73 and 87. Here again we find a 7th involved ergo cosmic STOP sign, for those who are paying attention.

89 - 97( 7th twin set ) this 7th set is last primes before the number 100 aka 5 * 20 or 4 * 25.

101 - 103( 8th twin set )

107 - 109( 9th twin set )

113( 8th isolated prime )

127( 31st prime and 9th isolated prime ergo the last prime before a 10th isolated prime, is reminiscent of last twin set before 100.

r6

13. ### Captain KremmenAll aboard, me Hearties!Valued Senior Member

Messages:
12,738
Why must you continually ignore the merits of 42?
Is it because it is not a Prime that makes you ignore it so?
Consider Sylvester's sequence:

10650056950806 is 3263443 times 3263442
3263442 is 1807 times 1806
1806 is 43 times 42
42 is 7 times 6
6 is 3 times 2
2 is 2 times 1

1807 is not a prime, but 3263443 is.
In fact, it is the largest known prime occurring in Sylvester's sequence: a(n+1) = a(n)^2 - a(n) + 1, where a(0) = 2.
http://primes.utm.edu/curios/page.php/3263443.html

Values derived from this sequence have also been used to construct finite Egyptian fraction representations of 1, Sasakian Einstein manifolds, and hard instances for online algorithms. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylvester's_sequence
Becoming interested?

Last edited: May 29, 2013
14. Captain, I've read your stuff but do not see much significance of any 'merits" of 42 as you suggest exists. I've never heard of a "Slynvester" and see no real cosmic significance. So there is an atom/element that is associated with 42. There a lots of elements/atoms associated with many differrent numbers.

If can attempt to clearly state why you think there is some cosmic significance associated with number 42, please state them, as I've not seen it yet.

Sylvester means nothing to me and not sure whey it means so much to you. Thanks for your attempts, I just don't find the cosmic significance of 42 and certainly not more than all I've posted. No comparsion that I can see.

r6

15. ### SFinnRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
6
Where does the number 8 factor into any of this? Because while pi has been calculated out to over 10 trillion digits you chose to arbitrarily truncate it at 7 places. The only problem with that is:

3.141592^3 =/= 31.00627 but rather 31.00625.
3.1415926^3 = 31.00627.

16. If your referging to my statement that you quoted "Pi = 3.14 15 92....mathematical infinity..o8o" that o8o was meant as two ways of symbolizing the words and decimal dots .."mathematical infinity.." that preceded the "..o8o.." i.e. sometimes just a set of dots will be used to represent infinity ex.

3.141.......and in my statement above I inlcuded teh words "mathematical infinity"....and I include the vertical "8" becuase I do not have the common horizontal "8" ssymbol that is used to express infinity. I also added in the o8o on each side of the 8 to infer "oo".

Apparrently it is confusing to you and at least one other poster that the teh o8o that followed "...mathematical infinity..." were meant as symbols of infinity. The oo also or sort of comes in to play in Pi^3 becasue of the two zeros( 00 ) on the irrational side of 31.00 62 7.

Some people, and some times myself will think of a single zer( 0 ) as meaning infinite, tho technically, or in it most strict sense it may not, or does not. So a double zero( 00 ) on the irrational side, may appear to myself and others as a double dose of infinity that further seperates the rational side 31 from the irrational in infinite side of Pi^3.

First of all, Pi and Pi^3 is an infinite number ergo technically or in the most strict sense, it does not terminate. Humans have will continue to terminate Pi or my case Pi^3 at any place they so choose to do so. You do not seem to understand that, I'm giving explanations of why I believe that our mathematical metaphysical Universe, contains numbers that specifically try to tell us that to go futher on this infinite trajectory/pathway leads to may even lead to madness or is fruitless or meaningless or fun but is unesccesary to grasping our finite physical Universe, etc.....

Now this is fair enough assessment that I had not considered i.e. that you limit Pi to seven integer places to begin with. I all cases, all I've ever done is punch in the Pi symbol on my calculator---- and that gives many integer places ---and then I hit the X^3 symbol and again I get many more interger places.

So that is arbitrary in that I've used whatever the specific calculator did, not what I choose.

I choose to say that a mathematically metaphysical Universe is telling us to STOP at 7, and gave various numerically linear and 3D reasoning explanations why I think there exists a cosmic STOP sign( 7 ).

.00 is the first waring of isolating the 31 from the irrational side.

62 is like a repeating of 31 or incorporates a cosmic left and right bilateral set ex 31 left right spinal nerves of the most complex organism we know to exist in Universe.

And again number 7 and some of the cosmic linear and 3D reaonsing explanations. I believe there are more that I can not recall by have a file on my old not used any more, mac laptop somewhere.

Hope that explains why, where, how etc.....and thx for taking the time to ask for clarification instead of the troll-like attitude we find around sci-forume where a troll will only shoot from the hip at anything they dont understand and not ask questions anytime, becasue macho trolls do not ask questions

.

Like the 50's movies trolls shoot anything they dont understand.:shrug:

r6

17. Pi^4 = Pi-time?

Pi^3 = 31.00 62 7.....

The above 3D Pi.

Pi^4 = 97.40 90 91 03 40 02 43 72 36 44 03 32 68 87 05

The above here is Pi-time.

If we divide pi-time into 4 equal parts/vectors we get 24.35 22 7 27 58 50 0609309110083172176.

H,mm interesting that here again we observe a #7 occurring at the 7th integer place/position as we do in Pi^3.

31.00 62 7 STOP...i.e go no further into irrational infinity

24.35 22 7 STOP.."" ""

I now take notice of the FSConstant( below ) having a #7 at the third integer place/position and 6th place/position.

0 .00 7 29 735 2569 8

If gave merit to one place or poistion on the rational side, even tho it is zero, that 2nd #7 would be in the 7th integer place/position also.

31.00 6 27 668 0299 8..

a(alpha/FSC) is 0 . 0 0 7 29 735 2569 8..
..........Pi^3 = 31 . 0 0 6 27 668 0299 8..

This 31 may be associated with the primary set of 31 Great Circle-like Polygonal Planes( GrCPP's ) of the ultra-high frequency geodesic spherical, 5-fold Icosahedron( Phi--1.618 )-- spacetime gravitational membrane{2D?} --- as the rational aspect of consciousness( 31 spinal nerves )

And the left over, irrational side of Pi^3 may associate with the irrational side of consciousness and this irrational side{0 0 6 27 668 0299 8 } is very close to the Fine-Structure-Constant aka alpha/FSC---0 . 0 0 7 29 735 2569 8.. ---.

So linear Pi is a one or 2D(?) ratio of circumference-to-diameter.
...{ Bekenstiens black hole mathematics led to his holographic scenarios and his conclusion, that,.... "we appear to be 2D creatures having an illusion of 3D".....[/FONT]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant

..."Therefore 1/137.036 is the value of the fine structure constant at zero energy."...

r6

18. ### RJBeeryNatural PhilosopherValued Senior Member

Messages:
4,222
8008135. Most important number.

19. GrCP's Chart/List/Layout

In following chart/layout/list I've repositioned the 4-fold, 3 GrCP's that define the octahedron and recall that those 3 are doubled when constructed with paper circles i.e. it takes 6 paper circles to create the octahedron. Similar thing happens with VE/jitterbug when it transforms to the octahedral phase, it is doubled ergo 6 is added to the other numerical 6 line and column, as I had also done with 4 GrCP's.

Green andfour red, 4-fold set...three, blue 5/phi-fold set in next line.
3....4........6......6.....10...12.....15......
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

.....(4).......................10............15......

........................................12...............

(6)............6.....6...................................

.....4.......................(4)......................

3.............(6)..................................

20. ### dumbest man on earthReal Eyes Realize Real LiesValued Senior Member

Messages:
3,523
r = 18th letter of alphabet
r + r + 6 = 42
rr6 = 42
reciprocal of 31 = 13
13 = 7 + 6
7 x 6 = 42
Even really Dumb, insignificant, bandwidth wasting Trolls can manipulate simple numbers. Zero (0), in most numbers, is a placeholder indicating no value.
m = 13th letter of alphabet
r = 18th letter of alphabet
m + r = mr.
13 + 18 = 31 !
mr. + rr6 = Mr. rr6
m + r + r + r + 6 == 73 ( prime # ?!!)
reciprocal of 73 = 37 ( prime # ?!!)
73 + 37 = 110
1 1 0 = 11 and place holder
remove placeholder from 110 = 11
11 + 31 = 42 ?!!
ERGO - even an insignificant bandwidth wasting troll, with a confirmed, ( by Mr. rr6 ) value of EVEN LESS than 0 can Mathematically Prove in a few equations that MR. rr6 is an example of a Prime _________. Would fail to matter 1 iota what is placed in blank area, Mr. rr6, are you ready to handle THAT?

just moving along

21. For The Heck of It I Did the Following;

3, 4, 6, 6, 10, 13, 15 = 7 axis sets ergo 87 minus 14 redundantly congruent GrCP's

I got to thinking how much that #7 is involved/related and associated to Pi and its powers etc, that I've laid out, so, just for the of the heck of it, I did the following;

7 * 73 = 511 and I thought, that seems to be familiar looking a number, so I did the following;

511 / 1000 = .511 and realized that is the mass of the electron, if I recall correctly.

r6

22. ### dumbest man on earthReal Eyes Realize Real LiesValued Senior Member

Messages:
3,523
Doh! mass or charge ?

In physics :
A stable elementary particle which is the negatively charged constituent of ordinary matter, having a mass of about 9.11 × 10-28gram (equivalent to 0.511 MeV), a charge of about -1.602 × 10-19coulomb, and a spin of ½. Also known as negative electron; negatron.

How does that weigh into your......uhh......theory ?
And speaking of weight - what is the weight of said electron?

Last edited: Aug 14, 2013
23. Mass of Protonic Quarks = 11

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton

...."A proton has a mass of approximately 938 MeV/c2, of which the rest mass of its three valence quarks contributes only about 11 MeV/c2; much of the remainder can be attributed to the gluons' QCBE.".....

So it appears the actual mass of quarks in proton is 11 as the 3 quarks( fermionic matter ). Wow that is huge differrence from 938. which is mostly bosonic force mass. Go figure.

So, since like so many of these numerical associations, I stumble across, I had to see where 11 fits into this 7 or 73 or 87 set of primary GrCP's.

77 / 11 = 7 and 77 GrCP's is 4 more than 73 and 10 less than 87, which 87 has the 7 + 7 redundantly congruent GrCP's.

Again, these are just quick and easy to stumble across associations and not part of rigorous do the same thing for every number type of correlation.

I.e. first time was 7 * 73 = 511 and then 511 / 1000 = .511

Here it is 7 * 11 = 77.

But we have to start somewhere, and as cosmic explorer--- lacking greater/higher education --- I begin with the easiest possible explorations available to me. As I recall, Einstein and/or some other greats, suggested that any final solution to GUTOE would be simple, not complex.

Well simple is certainly my neck of the woods.