Possibility of star formation around black holes

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by Beaconator, Jan 27, 2014.

  1. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    Anybody else reading these posts in this voice:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    river,

    it's massively obvious that your comments are nothing more than purposely argumentative causing nonsense.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Beaconator Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    872
    Why do you add to the nauseam ?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    the " nauseam " is this topic and it's useless incorrect spewing.
     
  8. Beaconator Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    872
    I did that on porpoise...

    View attachment 7243
     
  9. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    so now it has be resorted to petty shenanigans.
    i see.
     
  10. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    this topic makes my brain hurt...
     
  11. Beaconator Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    872
    It's pretty simple really. Think of a black hole like an atomic nucleus, a quasar representing the path of an electron in a circuit, and a star appearing or going supernova like a chemical reaction observed from the positive end or negative end of a circuit respectively.
     
  12. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    ... why would I do that?
     
  13. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,630
    Why think of anything other than what is simply is?
    A BH need not reside in a QUASAR or AGN....
     
  14. river

    Messages:
    13,284
    Or a galaxy core
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    13,284
    If............reason and logic is attacked , unreasonably , and accepted . Then we are in trouble
     
  16. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,630
    Yep, correct, but all galactic cores do have BH's

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2014
  17. river

    Messages:
    13,284
    Based on what evidence ?

    So far there is no sound theory that explains the galactic jets coming from , any galactic core

    As well , since a , BH , is a singularity , how is it that these , galactic jets , have , this energy spewing out from two opposite poles of the galaxy
     
  18. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Let some time go by, and then back to the same trolling.
     
  19. river

    Messages:
    13,284
    So hard reasoning and the following logic is " trolling "

    I then also find the weak reasoning and the following logic , is " trolling "

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    river
     
  20. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,630
    river's asked:
    based on what evidence?
    _________________________________________

    You have been informed of the myriads of evidence for SMBH's many time.
    Being in denial is sad.
    ___________________________________________
    rivers said:
    So far there is no sound theory that explains the galactic jets coming from , any galactic core
    _________________________________________________________

    Your denial problem has reared its ugly head again.
    Again the polar jets have been explained to you.

    _____________________________________________________________________
    rivers said
    As well , since a , BH , is a singularity , how is it that these , galactic jets , have , this energy spewing out from two opposite poles of the galaxy
    __________________________________________________________________

    More denial....more Ignorance of valid explanations already put to you.


    _____________________________________________________
    AlexG:
    Arguing with a crank - useless
    __________________________________________________________________

    It seems to me they get some orgasmic pleasure out of being able to tell themselves, they can think for themselves, Ignoring all that has gone before them.
    No harm actually done though, as the established mainstream and society in general, ignore such rantings.
    The status quo remains as is.
     
  21. river

    Messages:
    13,284
    As I said

    So hard reasoning and the following logic is " trolling "

    I then also find the weak reasoning and the following logic , is " trolling "

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  22. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,630
    rivers said:
    So hard reasoning and the following logic is " trolling "
    I then also find the weak reasoning and the following logic , is " trolling "
    ________________________________________________________

    Ignoring the giants that have gone before you is certainly not logical.
    Being fooled by self Gratuitous thoughts and delusions, and not being able to recognise when one is wrong is dumb.
     
  23. river

    Messages:
    13,284
    ________________________________________________________

    Thing is that " giants " restrict your reasoning and logic

    And None of these " giants " have said or implied they " know it all "

    You have though pad , and thats your obvious mistake
     

Share This Page