J.B. every single one of your posts paints one or more of the following subliminal messages: ' "race" exists ' ' sympathize with the "white" person, as they are suffering from "brown" or "black" people' ' "racial" integration does not work' ' the more "black", the more inferior, look at these stats of their violent behavior' ' "blacks" are inferior, and therefore should return to Africa or be exterminated' ' the Nazis hated the "blacks," but not the "Jews" ' ' it's not "black"; it's "Negro" '
Of course, Facial, there is an even larger, subliminal message contained within J.B.s posts. And it is one with which I can totally agree: I, J.B., am an unthinking, uncaring, uneducated, racist asshole.
YES YES, suffering from the burdon or brown or black people. YES, point out one place in America where it does.. NO, not inferior. When it comes to violent behaviour blacks are superiour. NO, Blacks are not inferior, blacks should not be exterminated, blacks should want to return to Africa. ' Learn history, the nazi's hated the Jews to. (I like how you capitialized the word nazi) Yes it is Negro http://www.uncf.org/
Having trouble on spelling and grammar, as usual (I like how you included one 'o' in your 'too') So the Nazis hated the "Jews" as well. Wow! I never knew that!
And after they return to Africa, you will want to kill them all, out of fear that they exist in the first place.
Sounds like your giving us insight within your own feeling's. You keep using me to bring forth thoughts, that I myself don't think.
Chomsky has taken a larger view on what manipulates things like public opinion and restricting research grants on human race. There is a pretty good essay on his view. Getting you to accept the Orwellian erasure of your ancient culture and biological heritage benefits our nature killing large industries. http://es.geocities.com/sucellus23/781.htm
You are not aware of your own feelings. However, I clearly don't advocate genocide on the highest mental levels. I suppose you transgress across the lines of racism much like any African American would advocate a return to slavery or "white supremacy." If you have trouble living on the same continent, you will have trouble living on the same earth. This statement as such applies for all racists like you.
You assessed incorrectly, and because the term "racist" is used to exclude many from participation in debates, you're not attempting to debate: you're attempting to shut me down. Not logical, not scientific, not smart. :m:
Witness the culture of "if it feels good do it" and "to hell with logic" at sciforums no less. We're much closer to a dogmatic utopian religious group fantasy community than philosophical truth or scientific fact by going in this direction. This smacks of borderline psychosis and egomania.
Let's make a point clear here: Between the real biologists on sciforums there has never been a disagreement on the subject of race as a biological concept. So basically my message is: fuck off if you claim to be on the side of science.
So all biologists dissent from the views of the following researchers: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/08...ef=sr_1_15/102-7817056-5576101?_encoding=UTF8
1. You cannot read: I said all biologists on sciforums. 2. I know biologists who do not believe in evolution. 3. you will probably fail now to put 1 and 2 together. 4. Race is still not used in biology as a valid subclass of species. 5. Subspecies is. 6. Subspecies is defined. 7. The only other human subspecies we know off than homo sapiens sapiens is extinct. 8. anthropology is certainly using race as a basis of classification. 9. In this respect there are certainly differences between human races. 10. that doesn't make them into subspecies. Because why are all resident racists pushing race? Not because there are differences between races. It is because they want to push that there are INTRINSICAL differences between races that qualifies them as biological entities. Which they are not in modern biology. Start with the basics.
Here's your logical error, explained: http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html#numerum You also make an additional error, which is conflating "real biologists on sciforums" with an accurate representation of biologists or biology. The word "real" there sounds something a five-year-old would say to prove its point, don't you think? Basic logic helps you argue without looking like a fool, no matter how big the point size of your illogical rebuttal.