Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by garbonzo, Mar 9, 2015.
You're calling me stupid?
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
Are you admitting that you're willfully ignorant?
Are you saying I'm willfully ignorant? Why? Based on what evidence?
Certainly its paranoia! and stupid as well. You have claimed anyone that objects to the nonsense you post as not seeing the situation as it should be seen...you have derided all of science over many threads.....you claim all that oppose you are out to get you......
You most certainly are presenting good reasons as to why people may infer you are stupid and paranoid.
I would claim you are being totally intellectually dishonest, but I cannot find anything worthy of calling intellect in your rantings and ravings.
And more insults. You should probably quit while you're ahead. You're not helping your position at all here.
As opposed to what you do, which is ignore factual evidence and put people on ignore...
What factual evidence have I ignored? And where is ignoring people a rules violation?
Come on guys. MR has created a magical world, perhaps only in his head, and it's beautiful, and who are we to be the ultimate judge of what's real? Maybe death isn't real. I can conceive of a future where our consciousness can exist as pure language or code, to be installed in any number of alternate media. Paranormal research must at least be given the benefit of the doubt. There is evidence in this case, a recorded sound. I agree it sounds like human speech. It could be that, in the future, the saved baby uses a time machine to go backwards and encourage those guys in their rescue attempt. Or maybe in the future there will be time phones.
Yep..I created this whole incident. Made up the 6 rescuers who heard the voice coming from the car, and made up the audio clip of the voice. It's all in my head. Afterall, we all know it was REALLY just a talking river dolphin. lol!
What do you think of my theory?
Which one? The talking dolphin? The talking water? Or the time phone? You change your theory every day it seems.
Well, for starters, you have ignored the plethora of evidence that has been provided showing how easily the rescue workers could be mistaken with where the voice came from and what it was (including the fact that it is heard MULTIPLE times in your own video evidence outside of the supposed plea for help), you've ignored the fact that the recording in question doesn't give any indication of WHERE the sound came from, much less any indication that it came from inside the car, and you have ignored the fact that there were other people around the scene.
As for where putting people on ignore is a rules violation - that alone isn't... what makes it a violation is this:
Essentially, the spirit of why you are doing so is what makes it against the rules; you are doing it because you are incapable of defeating the arguments being presented in a logical manner backed with actual facts. So, you choose to ignore bits and pieces, or whole posts, where it suits you. You then continue to post your extraordinary claims without the required extraordinary evidence to back them, and posting, in essence, false and fallacious statements. This is, in essence, trolling and intellectual dishonesty.
No..you have only speculated that the voice came from the bridge. You have provided no evidence of this, and cannot explain why a bystander would shout "Why doesn't somebody help" as heard by the rescue workers.
I have provided evidence for my claims. 6 eyewitnesses and an audio clip. You have provided nothing but speculation and BS. Then for the last 3 pages you accuse me of saying things I never said, and attack my character based on these lies. This is what gets you ignored. You flame and insult and threaten when you can't make your case. As a moderator you should be setting a good example. But you don't. Because you don't know how to calmly and effectively debate an issue.
I'll wait for tomorrow's theory. They seem to be getting more and more imaginative.
I never said it came from the bridge. I also explained how it is unclear what, exactly, the voice was saying. The fact remains - we hear the voice several other times in that same video.
And it has been explained to you, time and again, why the "eye witnesses" are unreliable and why the audio clip does NOTHING to ascertain direction or location of the voice. And yet you STILL continue to ignore it.
Per the rules, nothing I have said about you constitutes flaming - they are simple observations, based on YOUR behavior.
The issue was "calmly and effectively" debated to death - you then decided to beat a dead horse repeatedly because you cannot accept the truth.
At this point, you are trolling, nothing more and nothing less.
No more imaginative than "voices from a corpse" Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Why are you so desperately dishonest?
The inference as any one can see is with regards to your beliefs, as soon as something happens that cannot at that instant, be immediately explained.
Oooooh, it must be a ghost! Ooooh, It must be some sort of supernatural event.
Jumping to the conclusions that you do, without investigating, as scientists do, convicts you of all the insinuations that you have thrown your way, and even those that you perceive to be thrown your way.
Like I said, If the cap fits, wear it.
Now you're accusing me of trolling. Is this another attempt to ban me?
I've already PM'd James R about this. We'll see what HE has to say, eh?
You have provided nothing but insults here. You have yet to offer one plausible explanation for how 6 rescue workers hear the same voice coming from inside a car they are all standing around nor why we in fact hear that voice on the audio clip. The evidence is strong and hasn't been refuted yet. Speculations of skeptics who weren't there will never trump eyewitness accounts or actual audio evidence.
"Ghosts" is not a plausible explanation either.
There is no evidence, only hearsay and wishful thinking.
Separate names with a comma.