Q-reeus's feedback (original title "Intellectual humility")

Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by wegs, Feb 7, 2021.

  1. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    35,615
    Moderator note: This thread has been moved to the Site Feedback forum, because it mostly deals with some personal issues that Q-reeus wanted to get off his chest. None of the posts above this point have been edited (apart from a moderator note inserted into the opening post), in order to preserve the existing post numbering, references etc. However, this thread is now dedicated to discussion of Q-reeus's various issues, for those who are interested.

    For those who would prefer to discuss the original topic of "Intellectual humility", a separate Q-reeus-free version of the discussion can be found in the Human Science subforum. Here is the link to that thread:

    http://www.sciforums.com/threads/intellectual-humility.164034
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,102
    Mind games continued.
    True as quoted there. But then you add:
    No ranting and raving and nothing about a chip on my shoulder. That thread a perfect example of your true character - totally at odds with your lofty words in #16.
    Ha ha ha ha. Now - don't forget to accuse me of 'nervous laughter'. That apparently god-like ability of yours to peer into my mind and read my every thought. Ha ha ha ha.
    Pointing out your hypocrisy in #16 was 'derailing the thread'? Umm...no. See above.
    PS: So nice of you to ban me and remove every post of mine from the original thread, and shunt this 'unedited' re-named version to a backwater. That response speaks for itself, whatever spin you want to put on it.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. wegs Matter & Pixie Dust Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,313
    The original thread derailed so much, it mutated into an entirely new thread.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,641
    Go figure

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    35,615
    No problem. It's a smart solution to the problem of your derailing of the original thread, isn't it?

    You can't accuse me of censoring your concerns. I've provided you with a dedicated venue to blather on with your pointless personal snipes, while leaving the original discussion free for others to discuss without your toxic input.

    I think I'm done with you, unless you have anything new to add?

    Also, please note for future reference that you have the opportunity to make amends and start acting like a decent human being at any time. You can still apologise to me and to your readers if it ever hits you that you've acted very poorly here. Your reputation has suffered, but it's not too late to try to do better.
     
  9. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,102
    Only that your ugly tactic of heaping baseless accusation upon baseless accusation, typically by reactively recycling my appropriate charges against you, has evidently worked its magic on the cowards and sycophants here at SF. Which is perpetually in groundhog day mode in the Orwellian year 1984. Now - don't forget to label me paranoid. Icing on the cake so to speak.
    That later addition needs no specific response. Just more of the James R same.
     
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2021
  10. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    23,682
    I'm seeing something else..

     
    RainbowSingularity, James R and wegs like this.
  11. wegs Matter & Pixie Dust Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,313
    Bells! That’s hilarious!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    RainbowSingularity likes this.
  12. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    35,615
    Don't tell lies, Q-reeus. As you know, I have made no baseless accusations. If I had done so, you would be able to quote me on at least one of them. You, on the other hand ... well, that was the only reason you started posting in this thread in the first place, was it not?

    You have only yourself to blame for how you appear to your readers. Take responsibility for your own behaviour. You ought to do the decent thing and apologise to me.
     
  13. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,561
    Decency
    common practice
    rules
    3 separate issues that have no business sharing the same table
     
  14. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    35,615
    Why not?
     
  15. foghorn Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    585
    What's happened here is that JamesR has disagreed with the clear thinking of Q-reeus, and so is now open to Q-reeus's hostility.
    It was all there in Q-reeus's first ever post to this site..
    My bold.
    ''Only claim to fame is to think clearly.'' and it seems arrogance.
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2021
    James R likes this.

Share This Page