quantum , electromagnetic or magnetic field

Discussion in 'Chemistry' started by river, Nov 11, 2011.

  1. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Wrong again.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion

    Why must you post absolute nonsense without bothering to check first?
    Why do you feel it is necessary to make claims on a subject about which you apparently know nothing?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Don't you know when to stop arguing!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Actually I'm not arguing, I'm pointing out that an ignorant post is an ignorant post.
    I only wish River knew when to stop making stupid claims.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    all based on matter

    not quantum energy
     
  8. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    What?
    Are you claiming that the Wiki article is incorrect?
    And thus physics is incorrect?
    What evidence do you (think you) have for this?
    (Other than, of course, your own ignorance on the subject).
     
  9. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    none of the explanations talk of quantum energy world though

    all the ingredients are there , but what is happening inside each and every ingredient is what I'm after
     
  10. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Have you ever considered the possibility that they don't because it's nothing to do with quantum energy?

    WTF do you mean "inside each and every ingredient"?
     
  11. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    its not about having to with that

    because they didn't include it ( quantum energy ) , in there explaination doesn't mean quantum energy doesn't exist

    its just means they never thought of it
     
  12. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Actually, it is.

    No has said it doesn't exist.

    Er, no. It's just that it doesn't apply.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    so where have they though , thought upon quantum energy , as I do , whom and what thinking
     
  14. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    I don't know what you mean.
    Have actually tried Googling for "quantum energy"?
    (On second thoughts, it's probably best if you didn't: there's too many crank sites using that term. I wouldn't want you to get even further off track).

    Re your edit:
    Possibly no-one, nowhere, at any time has "thought" about this the way you do.
    But that's because you seem to have no clue whatsoever what "quantum energy" is, and appear to think it's some sort of all-pervasive panacea and explanation for everything.

    Start here.
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    so lets get back on track , then , I'll follow your advise here about google

    every atom has the quantum world inside it

    heck even an electron does ( that I googled )
     
  16. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    I'm not sure what you mean by "the quantum world".
     
  17. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    the space in which the quantum resides
     
  18. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Here we go. Doesn't "the quantum reside" (whatever that means) in space as we know it? Isn't that why, for example, photoelectric cells works?
     
  19. river

    Messages:
    17,307

    yes and no

    this quantum space is not seperate from our space , yet what happens within it , is different from our macro world

    space could be divided in some way

    but still be connected with the macroworld



    don't know about that
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2011
  20. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    In other words you are, once again, speculating from ignorance.

    Exactly.
    What makes you think your unsupported speculations are worth anything, given the depth of your ignorance?
    You seem to think that not knowing (and what's worse, not being arsed to actually find out) is some sort of valid foundation for making specious claims and expecting them to be given serious consideration.
     
  21. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    what am I ignorant of , specifically , what specifically , what form of knowledge
     
  22. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    so then explain how photoelectric cells work , since this is the bases of your last statement above

    with quantum energy as being part of the explanation
     
  23. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Physics (at the very least), judging by your posts.
    You have made numerous claims which were completely wrong.
    You have made numerous claims extrapolated from lack of knowledge.
    You continue to speculate without seemingly having any idea as to what you're talking about.

    This being a perfect example:
    Are you telling me you don't know how the photoelectric effect works?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect
    Next you'll be telling me you didn't know that's why Einstein got his Nobel prize...
     

Share This Page