Wrong as usual, when ranting on that pet subject. Getting Cheney under oath would be a reasonable first step toward acquiring that proof, if there is any. It's already not the first step - so it's long overdue, then, in such obviously dubious and apparently incriminating circumstances. ? ? I've been saying for years that it's long past time to put Cheney under oath, in investigating half a dozen matters. I think the failure to do that is a severe mark against the credibility and apparent integrity of the Congressional oversight committees. What false motivation did you have in mind ? There is no evidence of that, and plenty against it. Why do you insist on something that appears to be contradicted by every fact and circumstance and event in front of you ?