samcdkey on Islam

Discussion in 'Religion Archives' started by superluminal, Aug 15, 2006.

  1. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    Note how she danced around the question without answering it.

    And, the term 'infidels' refers to who?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    And they should be taught as such alongside the other myths and legends of our history, nothing more.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    We actually learned religion as a part of history, so I would say you are partially right.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    I did answer the question only it was directed at someone with better comprehension than you.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Use a dictionary:

    Infidel
    Noun

    1. A person who does not acknowledge your God.
     
  8. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    Yes, religion is a part of history, as is the myths of Zeus and Hercules.

    Islam and Christianity, amongst many other religions, should be treated and taught as such, myths.
     
  9. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Apparently the opinion of other people is as usual with you, equivalent to nothing.
     
  10. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    No, you didn't.

    Therefore, the infidel is them in your 'us vs them' non-acknowledgement.
     
  11. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    And you are perfectly able to demonstrate your religious opinions as something? That would be a first, for any theist.
     
  12. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Your comprehension defies comprehension.

    The us vs them only exists where consideration is necessary.

    e.g. I have several friends who are Hindus and several more who are Catholic.

    If I invited them over, I would have to be careful to have different foods and drinks so that no one would feel discriminated against.

    I would also need to keep in mind if it was the time for puja or Lent, so that I would not inadvertently offend someone by offering a food or drink that they are avoiding.

    There are differences between people but tolerance and consideration can bridge these differences and bring people to a better understanding of each other.
    To insist that all must be the same is selfish and only drives people further apart.
     

Share This Page