Science thought, a journey back in time.

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by theorist-constant12345, Jan 30, 2015.

  1. Russ_Watters Not a Trump supporter... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,051
    Um....so you have the definition correct, but still applied it incorrectly. You mean to ask him to prove your idea "false": it is your responsibility to construct it in a way that it is "falsifiable".
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

    A few points....
    [1] The onus is on you to falsify the incumbent model, or show that your alternative model matches reality better than the incumbent model.
    [2]You have nothing to falsify, just a conglomeration of pseudoscience.
    [3]You already are in pseudoscience.
    [4]You fail the scientific method.
    [5]You fail peer review.

    Here, I'll help you. This is from an old thread for any alternative theorist pusher to align with to be able to claim their "hypothesis" have any substance.

    [1] Don't present the theory as fact...don't present it as something that is "faite accompli" It most certainly isn't:

    [2] Gather all the experimental and Observational evidence to support your claims...

    [3] Whatever you have at the very least, must be able to explain and predict better then the incumbent model:

    [4] Your theory almost certainly is going to be challenged, and will need to run the gauntlet:

    [5] You will be told you are incorrect and your theory is wrong in most cases:

    [6] Throwing a tantrum will not win you any support:

    [7] You’re going to be asked tough questions. When someone asks you a question answer it.

    [8] When someone demonstrates a point you made is wrong, acknowledge that it is wrong and accept it:

    [9] Peer review may not be perfect, but it is absolutely necessary. The participants of any forum one sets out his alternative theory on, are your peers. Accept that:

    [10] If you think you have accomplished a theory over riding Evolution, SR, GR the BB QM or Newton, you most certainly have not: 100 years and more of past giants, and the 100's of books and papers since, means that you will not invalidate such overwhelmingly supported ideas in a few words or posts: Accept that from the word go:

    [11] In all likelyhood you are not Einstein, Newton, Hawking Bohr or Feynman: Don't pretend to be.

    [12] And finally always be prepared to modify your ideas/model/theories:

    [A Grumpy addiditive:]
    [13] Make damn sure that you understand current theory as it is presented by the "main stream" before you embark on your exploration of new frontiers. That is the starting point. Our recent troubles are caused by the fact that our would-be Hawkings don't even understand the first postulate(Relativity) and flat out deny the second postulate(constant, invariant c)yet still claim to understand the theory based only on those two postulates. This is not rationality, it is delusion.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Thank you for the explanation.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Russ_Watters Not a Trump supporter... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,051
    The problem with letting guys like T-C stay on a site like this to get kicked-around is that if indeed he's mentall ill instead of just being a trolling teenager (do adults do that?), then it becomes a bit like making fun of a cancer patient for being bald. So yeah, I hope he's just a trolling kid and not an old person succombing to dementia or a schizophrenic.
     
    Seattle likes this.
  8. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    Agreed. I often wonder how many of these people that seem crazy actually are crazy. It gives one pause...
     
    Seattle likes this.
  9. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,849
    That's why I try to ask those kinds of questions. If I find out there actually are crazy obviously I would then just stay away from that thread.
     
  10. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

    Pure solid unadulterated gibberish!
    Time is that which evolved at the BB along with space.
    Time is what separates you by 13.83 billion years from the BB.
    Time is what stops everything from happening together, just as space stops everything from being together.
    Without space, without time, [henceforth known as spacetime] there would be nothing. Space is real, time is real, spacetime is real.


    https://einstein.stanford.edu/content/relativity/a11332.html
    Experiments continue to show that there is no 'space' that stands apart from space-time itself...no arena in which matter, energy and gravity operate which is not affected by matter, energy and gravity. General relativity tells us that what we call space is just another feature of the gravitational field of the universe, so space and space-time do not exist apart from the matter and energy that creates the gravitational field. This is not speculation, but sound observation.
    Sten Odenwald:
    https://einstein.stanford.edu/content/relativity/a11332.html
     
  11. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    The first discussion would not be how did we get here .......common
     
  12. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    What would your first question be?
     
  13. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Who are we Humans before the Ancients ?

    The ancients didn't create us , We Humans were already here , we already existed

    The ancients fiddle around with our genetic make up
     
  14. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    We are just Humans pre-science really, no time era, just before discovery really, it does not matter when as much has why.
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    The why maybe important

    But what concerns me right now , is that Humanity is being confused by the past , the Ancient past , we were Humans long before the Ancients

    And thats whats important to think about

    river
     

Share This Page