Scientific Retards

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by OilIsMastery, Jun 6, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    He edited the wikipedia article using the link I showed him. The link shows idiots who actually believe diamonds and diamondoids are formed from Jurassic and Cretaceous algae using isoptopic "analysis."
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Omg.. new level huh.. ? lol
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    It just goes to show you how biogenic "theorists" have to twist and warp reality and rewrite all the literature in order to convince people that their religion is true.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    What is your proof ?

    That said, someone has changed it.. then someone else changed it back.

    I'm not going to be a part of this.

    I suggest the both of you find new sources.
     
  8. synthesizer-patel Sweep the leg Johnny! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,267
    Do you think he might actually be a chatbot instead of a real person?

    At the best of times he's only barely coherent - his comprehension is akin to that of a 7 year old - and occasionally - like in that last post he just spews out a string of garbled nonsense - like he's just taken snippets of what I've posted - stiched them back together in no particular order and then hit post.

    Its my new hypothesis - how do we test it?
     
  9. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    I have no way of verifying who changed what..
    I am interested in that reference that got deleted though.
     
  10. synthesizer-patel Sweep the leg Johnny! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,267
    The paper I referenced is valid and unrefuted. It should therefore be left to stand in wiki until it is refuted
    In contrast the statement that diamondoids are formed in the mantle has no reference as to its authenticity.

    you tell me - on that basis which is more valid?

    If someone edited the wiki article then it wasn't me - but clearly someone on these boards is paying attention

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    I agree with you. I'm just interested in the referenced article. Do you have a link to it ?
     
  12. synthesizer-patel Sweep the leg Johnny! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,267
  13. synthesizer-patel Sweep the leg Johnny! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,267
    It is very telling that you describe wikipedia as "The Literature"

    It is equally telling that you have no problem with doing it yourself:

    http://oilismastery.blogspot.com/2008/06/to-anaconda-since-youre-only-one.html

    so its fine for you to edit wiki to favour your whacky propaganda - but not for someone else to update an article with genuine peer-reviewed science - oh no when that happens you cry foul.

    You are showing your true colours - and you're yella

    Loser!
     
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2008
  14. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Know something?
    You're right.
    I glanced at this thread a day or two ago and took a different message from it. I was more interested in the list of scientists in the opening post and pretty much overlooked the oil and helium thing.

    Sorry.
    It seemed like the topic had shifted from scientists to OilIsMastery (who is obviously not a scientist.)

    I suppose the topic was in my blind spot.

    Carry on.
     
  15. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
  16. OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2008
  17. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    No prob. lol
    I was just wondering how you thought is was off-topic

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  18. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    To be honest, I always thought that. Now I'm not sure.
    However, I fail to see what it has to do with the origin of oil..
     
  19. OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    Biogenic "theorists" like synthesizer-patel believe that the diamondoids in crude oil were only formed twice in the history of the universe, only on the Earth in sedimentary rock less than 15,000 feet TVD, and only in the Jurassic and Cretaceous, by algae.
     
  20. synthesizer-patel Sweep the leg Johnny! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,267
    It does not refute the extremely close match between the carbon isotope ratios of carbon in diamondoids and other forms of biogenic carbon

    It does not refute the difference in carbon isotope ratios of carbon in diamondoids and carbon in abiotic diamonds

    The paper itself has been refuted - Kenney's assertion ignores the fact all of life relies on being in thermodynamic disequilibrium with its environment - in order to prove his paper he needs to prove that life does not exist.

    http://chentserver.uwaterloo.ca/cou...refinery/chapter2-the-origin-of-petroleum.pdf

    It fails

    You fail

    Again
     
  21. OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    See link above.

     
  22. synthesizer-patel Sweep the leg Johnny! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,267
    I've read it - kenney merely asserts that - never proves it

    I can see where you got your style of scientific enquiry and presentation from.

    It goes like this:

    Pull something out of your arse

    Claim its true

    Claim its true louder

    Ignore refuting evidence

    Claim its true even louder

    Cry foul when all is lost

    Pull something out of your arse

    ad infinitum
     
  23. synthesizer-patel Sweep the leg Johnny! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,267
    This is so appropriate for OIM:

    http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/feb02.html
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page