Scientists Find More Abiotic Oil

Discussion in 'Earth Science' started by OilIsMastery, Aug 7, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 2 of 10
  1. Enmos

    Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Yea I guess.. they start looking for a way out now that the end of it appears to be in sight.
     
    Enmos, Aug 7, 2008
    #21

  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Enmos

    Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    What's hilarious ?
    I just asked you a question dude, at least have the courtesy to answer it..
     
    Enmos, Aug 7, 2008
    #22

  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    The Soviet Union was an atheist nation, therefore the abiotic theory is associated with atheism. Creationists and biogenic theorists who believe in miracles and magic live in America.
     
    OilIsMastery, Aug 7, 2008
    #23

  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Enmos

    Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    No matter, it still fits.

    Now are you a creationist or not ?
     
    Enmos, Aug 7, 2008
    #24
  8. iceaura

    iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
    iceaura, Aug 7, 2008
    #25
  9. Trippy

    Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    OilIsMastery.

    Your assertions are (partly) based on the logical fallacy that because Carbon is the 4th most abundant element in the Universe, it must be so in the earths crust (Sound skind of like "As above, so below" to me).

    However, I have demonstrated that Carbon in the crust and mantle does not even rank in the top 12.
     
    Trippy, Aug 7, 2008
    #26
  10. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    According to abiotic theory the amount of carbon in the earth's crust is irrelevant. However, if there is no carbon in the earth's crust as you claim, biogenic origin would be impossible.
     
    OilIsMastery, Aug 7, 2008
    #27
  11. Enmos

    Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Tell me how it works then..
     
    Enmos, Aug 7, 2008
    #28
  12. Trippy

    Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890

    Falsehood/Strawman.

    Nowhere did I claim that there was no Carbon in the earths crust (which would preclude the existence of the lump of marble I have sitting in front of me).

    I commented on your claims about the abundance of carbon in the earths crust, and demonstrated, with proof, that it was significantly less abundant than you appeared to be stating or implying.

    This is relevant, because several times you have quipped "Carbon is the 4th most abundant element in the universe" in response to people when discussing Abiogenesis.
     
    Trippy, Aug 7, 2008
    #29
  13. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    OilIsMastery, Aug 7, 2008
    #30
  14. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    As I said, the amount of carbon in the crust is absolutely irrelevant. According to abiotic theory, the source of carbon is the mantle.
     
    OilIsMastery, Aug 7, 2008
    #31
  15. spidergoat

    spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Russia is 70% Russian Orthodox Christians, it never was an atheist nation.
     
    spidergoat, Aug 7, 2008
    #32
  16. Enmos

    Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Enmos, Aug 7, 2008
    #33
  17. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    Ask someone who thinks there's no carbon in the crust of the earth. Oil isn't produced in the crust...

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    OilIsMastery, Aug 7, 2008
    #34
  18. Enmos

    Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Then were ?

    Edit: Ok, sorry. Wasn't paying attention.
     
    Enmos, Aug 7, 2008
    #35
  19. Trippy

    Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    Which contradicts an earlier claim that you've made - that the amount of Carbon in the Universe is somehow relevant to the argument.

    Would you like me to go through and provide links and quotes?

    Either the amount of carbon is relevant to the argument, or it isn't.

    One of your statements must be false, which is it?
     
    Trippy, Aug 7, 2008
    #36
  20. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    It's called the mantle which, if you made any attempt to understand this debate whatsoever, you would know already...

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    OilIsMastery, Aug 7, 2008
    #37
  21. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    No. The amount of carbon in the universe is relevant because, contrary to fundamentalist geologists, earth is not the only astronomical body in the universe.
     
    OilIsMastery, Aug 7, 2008
    #38
  22. Enmos

    Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    I already edited my post..

    So what about my question ? Are you a creationist or not.. ?
     
    Enmos, Aug 7, 2008
    #39
  23. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    Wrong thread. Debate hydrocarbon origin if you are intellectually capable.
     
    OilIsMastery, Aug 7, 2008
    #40
Page 2 of 10
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page