Not at the moment; the bit where it's evidence of how men are the real victims of sexism is out of vogue at present.
As long as you recognize that you have absolutely no idea what they are. No idea whatsoever. And neither does Damore. That depends on the number of women needed, from the applicant pool, and the size of the pool. And it's irrelevant - the strawman of perfect outcome is not at issue. Or not, perhaps. Maybe it's all sociological. There is no evidence whatsoever that "innate" factors are involved. No, it isn't. He was making another point entirely, beginning by misrepresenting the "issue". Or the partial achievement would benefit Google, and be not at all counter productive but instead intelligent management, and that you have assigned the label "heresy" to the wrong agents.