Splinter: Conservative Political Priorities re: Domestic, Intimate, and Sexual Violence

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by wellwisher, Mar 8, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. wellwisher Banned Banned

    Messages:
    5,160
    I think most men learn that nagging, witching and complaining is part of being a woman and wife. If men divorced based on that form of abuse, there would be no marriage that would last. Men, are bring quietly told to deal with it, like your dad did, since this is part of the package, but not the whole package. Man up and don't be a child, since their may be children who depend on you.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    . . . said the misogynist.

    Wow! I can't believe you made that grossly false sweeping statement. You really ARE an a-hole.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    21,855
    Maybe you should stop expecting women who are mentally ill enough to allow you near them, to be your work and fuck horse...

    "Witching"?

    Do you throw her in the water to see if she floats or sinks?

    Have you ever considered that it isn't them? That it might just be you?

    I mean, if the reaction you get from women is "nagging", "witching" and complaining, then perhaps it isn't them and the underlying problem stems from you.

    You whine more than any woman I know......

    Wow.. How you are single, I will never know....
     
    Xelasnave.1947 likes this.
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    wellwisher can't be serious. He's just trolling here. This forum has several resident trolls.
     
  8. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,623
    He's really not. He is this way on other forums as well.

    Ever wonder how Trump won? People like Wellwisher. "Grab women by the crotch when you can get away with it?" Wellwisher will come up with a reason why that's not that bad. Increase funding for science and math education? Wellwisher will have a reason why only gay welfare bums could support anything like that.
     
  9. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    This forum must have very forgiving and tolerant admins and moderators.
     
  10. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,623
    Honestly there is some value in knowing people like him exist. It's easy to say "no one is that partisan/gullible/misogynistic" but clearly that isn't true.
     
  11. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    While true, I sure wouldn't want to be around them in real life. Can you imagine a close family member with those thoughts?
     
  12. Tiassa Let us not launch the boat ... Staff Member

    Messages:
    34,449
    It's a long history. Certain ranges of crackpottery have traditionally received extraordinary protection under a pretense near to affirmative action; the idea was that if we set firm standards, large blocs of discussion would fail muster, and thus we would be too exclusive.

    That is, we've been cutting special breaks for what Americans call "conservative" or "right wing" for years, under the pretense of being "fair".
     
  13. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    I salute you! <thumbs up>
     
  14. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,623
    You may have them. People often say things on the Internet they wouldn't say in a family setting. I have a family member or two that I know to avoid political discussions with.
     
  15. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    I tend to avoid all political and religious discussions with relatives. It never ends well.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  16. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,919
    Did not surprise me at all in fact I thought it somewhat consistent with his approach. I am surprised he did not point to the scriptures to justify the statement.
    Alex
     
  17. wellwisher Banned Banned

    Messages:
    5,160
    Trump won because he had the best ideas, drive and talent to make it all work. Trump was not biased or incapacitated by PC. He was able to take it on and therefore he was able to exceed its dysfunction. Lack of dysfunction, appears abnormal to the left.

    Proof of this occurred in the theater district off Broadway. There is a new play, that is based on the transcripts of the Presidential debates between Hillary and Trump. The twist of the play is Trump is played by a woman, and Hillary is played by a man. The original liberal intent of this play was to demonstrate how if Hillary had been a man, she would have won. This is the leftist narrative or a male conspiracy.

    It turned out the opposite happened, based on the responses of the mostly liberal audience. The woman playing Trump was the more reasonable and likable character, based her using Trump's ideas and opinions. The man playing Hillary was not as likable, but was felt to be too wishy washy.

    When I post a countering argument and opinions, to leftist sexism, I do this do help the one-sided leftist brain look at both sides. It is usually taboo to present the other side, such that this is often censored, groups attacked and even grounds for suspension, less liberal mind be opened up and learning critical thinking skills. The left position is so fragile, that censor is needed to prevent falling over the edge.

    Relative to the play, although the audience like the she-Trump character the best, based on Trump's style and words, the audience still hate the male version of Trump, even though they could relate to his words and intend, via a woman. The Trump bias, is based on very shallow sexist criteria. When the substance of Trump was isolated via a woman, it could stand on its own. This was not the expected result, but it was very informative. Swamps are composed of shallow water.

    The violence and abuse of women has gone up as the impact of atheism and the left has increased in culture. The left employs a constant shake down scam under the guise of equal rights and justifiable rage. When religion was more dominant, women were protected and placed on a pedestal; 1950's, with even neighbors willing and able to step in to act as protectors. The left blames the right for the continued abuse, while being the matrix entitlement via the abuse of power.

    You can't have violent leftist demonstrations to settle arguments, and then expect that to translate to mutual respect between two sides like men and women.The peaceful leaning right, demonstrations, show how you respect each other. Calmness allows one to control rage that can escalate to abuse of each other.

    In America were have equal protection under the law. The concept of woman's rights means the left does not wish to have equal protection under law, rather one sex has extra laws just for itself. It is one thing for behavior to be a social fad, that has no backing by law. If you wish to buy a pet rock that is your choice. This does not violate equal protection under the law. It is another thing to alter the law, to add extra laws of some, to void the idea of equal protection under law. This behavior has noting to do with equal rights, which is a deliberate word game. This is based on entitlements. An entitlement is where you use and misuse law to give extras, to some groups, beyond equal legal protection by law for all. The slave owners were entitled beyond the slaves by laws the left created. It is about power grab.

    If we accept the premise of woman's right, we will need to have the same number of men's rights. This is the only way to approximate equal protection under the law; same number of laws. I brought up nagging because few men enjoy this, in the confines of a relationship. If men wished to be wimps and/or control the women to heir own advantage, this could be part of men's rights. How would women feel about that; shoe on the other foot? Men are more self reliant, since they learn to deal with nagging, in private, without forcing behavior change with law. That would only lead to further problems due to resentment. Hillary and many leftist thought she was entitled to be president just because she was a woman. Equal protection means free and open competition with only one set of laws for all. That is what happened. Tje left thinks rigged system via stacked deck of law is their entitlement.
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2017
  18. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    21,855
    You're full of it.

    Domestic violence in the 1950's was pretty much ignored. The reason is that it was not a crime to beat one's wife. So your golden age was the age when men could bash their wives and it was not a crime. Police rarely interfered, women were shamed if they attempted to leave or get a divorce, and divorce was rare. Religious institutions did not protect. Child sexual abuse was rife in many religious institutions and read the news. Homes for unwed mothers more often than not had the corpses of the babies buried in the back.

    Is that how you think women should be treated, wellwisher?
     
    joepistole likes this.
  19. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    You know, the only group of people who think the 1950s was some kind of "golden age" is old white men. Most women and almost all minorities don't think that at all. In fact, most women and minorities feel that "these are the good ole days".
     
  20. birch Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,509
    and there are plenty way, way worse too if that's not already an eye opener.
     
  21. birch Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,509
    This is so true especially the near to affirmative action part. it's infuriating and offensive because they act like they or their ideas are superior and count and your rights and others are not important enough to be taken seriously. Right wing
     
  22. birch Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,509
    You know all this that you describe such as dysfunction, intolerance, lack of critical thinking etc seems conservatives are more guilty of from observation and life experience.

    Peculiarly and maybe hilarious to some extent is that the conservative right wing tend to be the most closet dysfunctional, perverted, dishonest, insane, anti-family, wild etc etc of people i have ever dealt with. i notice is how they do this is they support these activities through big cold money making enterprises and conglomerates devoid of ethics vicariously while keeping a physical distance or ruse of pillar of society going or in it's place/back pocket. maybe it's because they are so concerned with putting on acts, airs and going through motions, rituals and appearances are at the forefront rather than any other consideration is on the bottom of the list. they also tend to be less sensitive than liberals which is not conducive to critical thinking skills very well either as they miss a lot of considerations like a bull in a china shop, but with conservatives believe so strongly and adamantly they are right. they definitely have an unshakable superiority complex like an immovable steer or a brick wall.


    Im just really curious. You really weren't aware that the conservative right wing is infamous for being the most liberally corrupt (albeit backdoor or covertly) than even liberals? you didn't know that religious institutions actually hamper and keep victims from justice often and as a habit, especially in past generations? you really didn't know they are the most lax and permssive in ethics, having scapegoats and putting on the front or covering up is what is top priority?and this is a system or way of life put in place too, isn't that sick? you really weren't aware that conservative rightwing when you get to know them personally can be the most luridly deranged, offensive, unfair and degraded in ethical logic and values than liberals? The one common and pervasive common denominator or character type that ties/characterizes conservative right-wing is as if they purposely chose to be or act the role of the conservative or polar opposite of what they really are because they lack it it most or are most at fault or what they are not. They have to live up to their high and mighty professed status/identity/persona of being ethical, moral, righteous. oh yeah, righteous is the word. they are trying to prove it to themselves to beat it down!!! and then beat you down and to take power then!!! lmfao
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2017
  23. wellwisher Banned Banned

    Messages:
    5,160
    The problem is your talking points are part of liberal indoctrination. All liberals use the same talking points. If you read my writings.I am come up with ideas, which are all over the place. I don't walk in lock step. I am the opposite of lock step, since I try to add new as often as I can.

    If I am among a gang who all walk in lock step; discussion forums, I will take a counter position based on the majority opinion. If discussion forums where mostly conservative, I would still take a counter point in an attempt to open minds. I also try to defend the minority voice, in forums. In this case, the bully majority is the intolerant left and the minority is from the right and/or has a religious connection. I defend the minorities of this forum land.

    Look at the demonstrations after the election, and tell me, based on actions and not words, which side is the most intolerant? Which sides will not allow speakers with contrary opinions to speak? The left is all about clever word games, whereas the right looks at actions.

    Why is the left so intolerant of other points of view, yet describes itself as the voice of the oppressed? I am a minority in terms of my opinions, since I create new things in all the forums areas. The novelty of my ideas makes me a progressive, yet why am I not defended by the tolerant left? You guys are all words, but your actions are inconsistent.

    If you have noticed, the leftist media has dropped the Russian connection to Trump from the limelight. In fact, the New York Times, just retroactively changed the headlines on one of its recent articles to remove the words "wire tap". Talk about revisionists history. The change of heart started when Trump accused Obama of wire tapping. The leaders you depend on are not as honest as you think. You should take that as a sign that it is OK to look outside the box and double check actions against words.
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2017
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page