SPLIT FROM - Testing gravitational Casimir attraction

Despite thousands of years of thought and study, scientists still cannot explain gravity. Really?

An atoms force field does not end at atom radius, but extend to infinity. In whole, an atom or planet maybe electrically neutral, but Every charge within has its own force field beyond distance, those forces overlapped to produce chemical bonding, magnetism and gravity. Ever wonder why is Fe=q1q2/r^2, Fg=m1m2/r^2, and mass proportional to proton numbers within it?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Isn't this why you got banned the last time?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

if so, isn't this place sucks?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Science does not suck. If it wasn't for science and knowledge you and I would still be swinging in the trees.
What does suck though are the stupid anti science types and Idiotic religious fundamentalists and Creationists, that literally go out of their way to disrupt scientific discussion.....

 

that's what you are doing now.

 

Where's your evidence to back up your claim?

Speculation doesn't count as evidence.

 

If atom's force field ended at atom radius, no matter able to form. The universe will be all single atoms floating around.

 

Where's your evidence to back up your claim?

Speculation doesn't count as evidence.

 

Leaving out your bullshit and commenting on the above....
Science certainly can describe gravity. It is explained in two excellent models, Newtonian mechanics and GR.
One describes gravity as varying inversely proportional to the square of the distance between two masses, and the other by the curvature of spacetime in the presence of mass.
What is true is that we do not actually know why gravity presents itself as it does.
But the models we use have enabled us to go into geosynchronous orbits, get to the Moon and land, send probes to Mars, and meet up with four gaseous and icy giants of planets in the one journey....that of course was the Voyager probes.

 

What is true is that we do not actually know why gravity presents itself as it does.

Then please debunk my theory.

 

No.

YOU need to debunk the currently accepted theory first before anyone needs to bother debunking yours.

I'm pretty sure this has also been explained to you before.

 

reported.
You are in the wrong section.

 

good science spirit!

 

No, you are in the wrong section. We have an alternative hypothesis section. You know that. You are being dishonest to salvage some respectability as well as deride science. You have failed.
Telling lies makes little baby Jesus cry.