Sponging off the Halloween Excuse: Sexy Women

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by gendanken, Nov 1, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. scheherazade Northern Horse Whisperer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,798
    Good link, Signal.

    While I support the concept that a woman has the right to dress in a manner that pleases herself, there is no doubt that certain attire sends an overt message of availability in the minds of many. We have places where you can run around scantily clad and be appropriate.....I believe they are called beaches. Shortage of beaches in these parts, lol....

    Years ago, I refused to go to the bar with a good friend of mine, because she was dressed in a manner that went beyond attractive, unto wanton. As I had the transportation, she conceded the discussion and changed her attire to something a shade more appropriate. Some may call me a prude, but I have ventured many paths alone as a woman and not come to harm by paying attention to a few such details.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Candy isn't enough for adults.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. clusteringflux Version 1. OH! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,766
    Beautiful women are the exception to every rule.They transcend feminism and culture.
    This is the law.
    Men just want them.
    Women want them, want to be them or want them dead.

    Put them in a group and you will witness behavior that would land the rest of us in a cell.

    (That's as poetic as I get, Gendergarten)
     
  8. nietzschefan Thread Killer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,721
    Ahh ..yes they do Clustering - you are correct about that - in any time...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phryne
     
  9. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    And it may be that you cannot comprehend that some people do not really care about their performance relative to other people - yet we do exist. It is possible for a janitor to take pride in his work, and it is possible for a Nobel laureate to be disgusted by his most recent research because he considers it superficial. You may disagree with their feelings about their own work, but your opinion does not invalidate their feelings.

    I imagine you post to please yourself, since you're certainly not getting paid for it. Are you indulging in autoerotic behavior? What about posting gets you aroused?

    What about my answer did you not understand?
     
  10. gendanken Ruler of All the Lands Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,779
    Bells:
    A bald joke from Bells: Priceless

    *grin*

    Seconded.

    Her complete inability to see past the harem, the little fishmouth can turn particle physics into a cat fight.
    The mewing, the clawing, the digging, she'll hack her way through an argument and cling to the trash her ego was born to devour.

    Because Madamme Bells, like all parlor Fascists, cannot process information outside of forum politics or the personal.

    All she needed to realize, to her schizoid chagrin and delight, was that Signal was female as this gave her talking points.

    I hear her illness does the same thing.

    So instead of addressing my need for her input on consumerism and its pathologies, she points out how allll these women in here are sucking my cock.

    Do you swallow, Chimpy? Are you going to let Bells humiliate your Empress like that?

    Who else is a female in here?

    Nietzche:
    Exactly.

    Think its the pornographers and the pimps double crossing our women?
    Feminism gave us Title X, a federal grant program that actually forces low income women to get pap smears in exchange for birth control.
    Imagine what the world would be like if males were forced to the doctor to get condoms.

    We'd be crawling with Bellsies.


    Gustav:
    Here's another: Lhaso Apso
     
  11. gendanken Ruler of All the Lands Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,779
    Actually, our little friend Bells, has just given my derailed thread its mascot.

    Like, wooot.

    Not even acknowledging the self-pwnage of her assuming Signal was male.
    Muahhahahahaha.....women.

    Edit:

    Thread's dead-- lest someone shows up with meat on their teleological bones to gnaw on.
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2011
  12. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    I'm proud of my baldness. See, it means I'm still a survivor and still alive.

    You have a fan who believes that women are at fault if they are raped. There are also other issues she has expressed which yes, are quite disturbing. That's your fan base my dear.

    Your talking point is to bitch and whine. Oh women show cleavage.. the horror.. how dare they. While you flout your proverbial cleavage for attention here. You are also an attention whore. Which is what makes this whinefest from you so ironic and amusing. This is a pathological need for you. It's why the other meglomaniac used to call you the Queen. Because you need them to fall all over you.

    You are so self involved that you cannot wrap your mind about what real life entails. Like when you commented on why I'd want to keep my children for example. It is who you are. So don't bitch and whine that women flaunt their wares. You are just the same. Only instead of flashing your tits and vag, you're exposing yourself in different ways. You are a very bright girl Gendanken. But you are also very American in your need to be popular and to be the centre of attention. Like when you queried why the men on this forum were so obsessed with Sam. You are like the quintessential cheerleader bitch that your media portrays. You feed on the attention. When you don't get enough of it, you make yourself as crass as you possibly can be.

    So not caring that Signal was male or female is "pwnage"? What does it matter? What? Do you think the women here hunt out other women to rub each other's nipples? Here is some advice from someone who has lived life and is quite a bit older than you. Grow up.
     
  13. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    gendanken:

    Good for you. I'm not quite sure how that response addresses the point I made, though.

    Are you saying that Midge should have her pay docked if she should happen to become pregnant?

    Or are you saying that women shouldn't get any maternity leave?

    Either way, it would be good if you could explain the reasons for your beliefs on this matter.
     
  14. chimpkin C'mon, get happy! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,416
    Making fun of someone for having cancer???

    Sorry, I'm not amused.

    You think someone going to a club in pasties and brown-stained buttfloss is nasty? You just topped that, lady.
     
  15. Captain Kremmen All aboard, me Hearties! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,738
    Not everything is for our amusement, I think.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Two women are accused of soaking a homeless, drug-addicted prostitute with gasoline and burning her to death after she reported that one of them had robbed her.
    Leslie "Jill" May, 49, was forced into a car, driven to a parking lot of the San Francisco 49ers Stadium, doused with gasoline and set ablaze, police said.
    A social worker said ''Jilly'' was a longtime crack and heroin addict who had lived and turned tricks on San Francisco's streets since the mid-1970s.
    ''She was engaging. She was funny. She was a tiny, itty bitty thing,'' he said.



    Read more: http://blogs.kansascity.com/crime_scene/2007/02/homeless_woman_.html#ixzz1cjLS1sTr
     
  16. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
  17. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
    I wonder why the discussions here so often remain shallow - why is it that the moment someone peeks under the carpet, there comes a horde of defenders of PC - and it's all over.

    Why?

    I mean, if they are so right, if they are so morally superior, if they know the objective truth, if they know "how things really are" -
    then why the bitterness? Why the lack of engagement? Why the defensiveness? Why the absence of analysis?
     
  18. chimpkin C'mon, get happy! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,416
    Ah, I remember that poster.
    And, yep.
    There is a vast, vast difference between doing something foolish and being at fault for what a rapist does.

    If a man does something and nothing bad will happen to him, but a woman does the same thing and runs a high risk of personal harm...what is that?
    (Which was Pineal's point... seemed to not be taken...)

    Quite frankly, the sort of places I go to on those rare occasions when I go cater to aging punkers who now have kids and jobs and bills and cars to keep on the road...and there is some cleavage among the women, but certainly not that much.

    I'm not out in the meat market clubs, so I don't see the flesh on parade.

    OTOH I used to go to gay clubs...and I've seen guys out in public wearing nothing but one of these:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Since I bat for both teams, but am now married, my definition of physically hot half-naked people of whatever genital persuasion 15 years younger than me...is...gee, that's annoying, I can't have.
    Of course if I talked to them...I wouldn't want. Intelligence is my biggest turn-on, and...most of the clubbers are pretty vapid.

    An old friend called them twinkies...soft and appealing on the outside, sweet and fluffy on the inside...no nutritional value whatsoever.
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2011
  19. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
    Read the link I provided earlier - "Marked for mayhem."

    From there:

    ...

    In a classic study, researchers Betty Grayson and Morris I. Stein asked convicted criminals to view a video of pedestrians walking down a busy New York City sidewalk, unaware they were being taped. The convicts had been to prison for violent offenses such as armed robbery, rape, and murder.

    Within a few seconds, the convicts identified which pedestrians they would have been likely to target. What startled the researchers was that there was a clear consensus among the criminals about whom they would have picked as victims—and their choices were not based on gender, race, or age. Some petite, physically slight women were not selected as potential victims, while some large men were.

    The researchers realized the criminals were assessing the ease with which they could overpower the targets based on several nonverbal signals—posture, body language, pace of walking, length of stride, and awareness of environment. Neither criminals nor victims were consciously aware of these cues. They are what psychologists call "precipitators," personal attributes that increase a person's likelihood of being criminally victimized.

    ...
    Distraction is another cue criminals look for. Some people think talking on a cell phone enhances their safety because the other person can always summon help if there's trouble—but experts disagree. Talking on a phone or listening to an iPod is a distraction, and armed robbers are casting about for distracted victims. "Not paying attention, looking like a tourist—having the map out, looking confused—absolutely makes people more vulnerable," Burke says.

    Being aware of your surroundings, however, may not help much if you don't know what to pay attention to. James Giannini of Ohio State University discovered something shocking: Women who are the victims of rape tend to be less able than average to interpret nonverbal facial cues—which may render them oblivious to the warning signs of hostile intent and more likely to enter or stay in dangerous situations.

    The same team also found that rapists tend to be more able than average to interpret facial cues, such as a downward gaze or a fearful expression. It's possible this skill makes rapists especially able to spot passive, submissive women. One study even showed that rapists are more empathetic toward women than other criminals—although they have a distinct empathy gap when it comes to their own victims. A highly attuned rapist and a woman who's oblivious to hostile body language make a dangerous combination.

    Even personality plays a role. Conventional wisdom holds that women who dress provocatively draw attention and put themselves at risk of sexual assault. But studies show that it is women with passive, submissive personalities who are most likely to be raped—and that they tend to wear body-concealing clothing, such as high necklines, long pants and sleeves, and multiple layers. Predatory men can accurately identify submissive women just by their style of dress and other aspects of appearance. The hallmarks of submissive body language, such as downward gaze and slumped posture, may even be misinterpreted by rapists as flirtation.

    ...
     
  20. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    || Oookay then.... Thread locked and under 'review' (make of that what you will).
     
  21. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    || I have decided to reopen the thread. There will be no sanctions, but needles to say my patience is running low. I've got several buttons on hair triggers, if you get my drift.
    Tread lightly. Even slight offenses will result in bans, infractions, and/or thread closure.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2011
  22. Pineal Banned Banned

    Messages:
    846
    Oh, I know and my response was irony on irony and confusing.
     
  23. Pineal Banned Banned

    Messages:
    846
    So if I have trouble with one rule, I must have the opposite rule?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page