Fermer05
Registered Senior Member
I read your posts again, but they are difficult to answer.Fermer05:
Are you going to reply to my objections to your ideas? Or are you to planning on ignoring what I posted?
I read your posts again, but they are difficult to answer.Fermer05:
Are you going to reply to my objections to your ideas? Or are you to planning on ignoring what I posted?
The Moon is not in resonance (resonance with what?)In addition to the Coriolis force, resonance also acts on the Moon:
Rotating around the Earth, the Moon approaches and moves away from the Earth, due to which the Moon periodically falls into resonance, and as a result, a supermoon and a micromoon occur. The reason for the Moon's resonance is the Earth's elliptical orbit. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermoon
So so far, your conclusions have been proven false. Does that lead you to reconsider your claims?In addition to the Coriolis force, resonance also acts on the Moon:
I think every single conjecture you have written is wrong. There are mountains of evidence disproving all of your conjectures. You are wasting every ones time.1. The solar system is an autonomous object of the Universe and is in a stationary state in space and does not rotate around the center of the galaxy.
I know. And you still haven't addressed that.I promote the "Stationary Model of the Solar System" hypothesis.
The movement of the moon is not the main topic but a secondary one.
You keep asserting these things without even checking them yourself.Planets and comets revolve around the Sun in highly elongated orbits, since the Sun does not revolve around the center of the Galaxy.
And the satellites of the planets will not be able to revolve around the planets in highly elongated orbits, since the planets revolve around the Sun.
Are you saying that planetary orbits would all be circular, rather than elliptical, if the Sun revolved around the centre of the galaxy?Planets and comets revolve around the Sun in highly elongated orbits, since the Sun does not revolve around the center of the Galaxy.
Objects in the Solar System cannot endlessly rotate around numerous centers.Comet Galya orbits the Sun every 75 years, in a highly elongated orbit with an eccentricity of about -0.9, due to the fact that the Sun does not revolve around the center of the Galaxy.
Will satellites be able to orbit the planets, the Sun and the center of the Galaxy in highly elongated orbits and with a long orbital period?
More unsubstantiated assertions.Objects in the Solar System cannot endlessly rotate around numerous centers.
The laws of celestial mechanics are not omnipotent and they are limited to the problem of three bodies, the Earth revolves around the Sun, the Moon revolves around the Earth, and nothing revolves around the Moon.
Not a single natural satellite of the planets has a permanent or temporary satellite, because... this will already be the task of four bodies, which contradicts the laws of existence.
I think you're probably misunderstanding what the three body problem is.The laws of celestial mechanics are not omnipotent and they are limited to the problem of three bodies...
That's plainly in contradiction to easily accessible facts.Not a single natural satellite of the planets has a permanent or temporary satellite...
Every object in the Solar System rotates around numerous centers. The satellites orbiting the Moon rotate around a center inside the Moon. The moon rotates around a center inside the Earth, close to the Earth's surface. The Earth rotates around a point near the center of the Sun. And so on.Objects in the Solar System cannot endlessly rotate around numerous centers.
As I have told you the Moon has several satellites in orbit around it.The laws of celestial mechanics are not omnipotent and they are limited to the problem of three bodies, the Earth revolves around the Sun, the Moon revolves around the Earth, and nothing revolves around the Moon.
Denying reality is generally not a good approach to science.Not a single natural satellite of the planets has a permanent or temporary satellite, because . . . .
Do your homework, Fermer05. As several people have pointed out to you, there are artificial satellites currently in orbit around Earth's Moon. An artificial satellite was even in orbit around a comet for quite a long time, just recently. Apart from that, numerous moons in our solar system have natural satellites in orbit around them - typically smallish captured rocks.Not a single natural satellite of the planets has a permanent or temporary satellite...
Did you read my post on the three body problem and decide that you might have better luck with four bodies than with three? No, Fermer. The laws of existence allow gravity to work on 3 bodies, or 4, or 20, or 278, or 9724, or 1 billion. There are no problems.... because... this will already be the task of four bodies, which contradicts the laws of existence.
Are you talking about the orbital period of the satellite around the Earth, or rotation of the satellite itself?By inertia, the artificial satellite of the Earth will rotate much longer than the artificial satellite of the Moon.
Not a single natural satellite of the planets has a permanent or temporary satellite, because... this will already be the task of four bodies, which contradicts the laws of existence.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SubsatelliteNot a single natural satellite of the planets has a permanent or temporary satellite, because... this will already be the task of four bodies, which contradicts the laws of existence.
By inertia, the artificial satellite of the Earth will rotate much longer than the artificial satellite of the Moon.