Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by Paul W. Dixon, Feb 28, 2001.

  1. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIEMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    All friends, family, colleagues and efans. Many, many thanks for your kind support.

    A URL of the ZoechlingNew - News Gateway - sciphysics relativity - SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    http://news.zoechling.net/sci.physics.relativity/200112180051590685200000589mbmjaolcom.html

    This provides an excellent summary of this most tragic concern and provides a news release that may be referred to all interested members of the government(s), officials and other concerned citizens.

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf now and for all eternity. May I express my profound gratitude to everyone for their kind help as well !!!

    All Best Wishes,

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIEMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    All friends, family, colleagues and efans. Many, many thanks for your kind support.

    A URL of the ZoechlingNew - News Gateway - sciphysics relativity - SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    <http://news.zoechling.net/sci.physics.relativity/200112180051590685200000589mbmjaolcom.html>

    "Where a potentially infinite number of universes can form in de Sitter space in the dominant theory of modern cosmology, it may be possible to form a transition in the large potential barrier between de Sitter space and the continuum with sufficient energy. The current energies at Fermilab may be derived from the luminosity now at 7E30 with the energy per collisional interaction 2E12 eV per cm squared per second. This yields an energy level of some E42 eV per cm squared per second. The combined effect in the beam at Fermilab is far greater than the largest cosmic ray energies observed in the solitary infrequent cosmic rays at E19 eV. Thus the proability of forming a transition towards de Sitter space at Fermilab is very great. Please comment on http://www.sciforums/ or http://www.sciforums.com.showthread.php?threadidid=2607
    regarding this possibility in the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now termed."

    We were able to access this thread via, google.com, with the above website entered or (supernova paul w. dixon) and then via cached websites.

    This provides an excellent summary of this most tragic concern and provides a news release that may be referred to all interested members of the government(s), officials and other concerned citizens.

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf now and for all eternity. May I express my profound gratitude to everyone for their kind help as well !!!

    All Best Wishes,

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2002
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    All friends, colleagues and efans: Many thanks for your most kind support and consideration in this most tragic concern.

    According to the text, Transpersonal Psychology, by Professor C. Tart it should be possible to express these concepts as outlined in this thread via other media.

    A live performance of free extemporaneous composition on piano, synthesizer with emulated voice is herewith posted for your possible interest. It is entitled:

    Angels Here and Now: Part III Gaia Forever

    You can download your free music at
    http:/www.coolgoose.com/go/music
    click classical
    click piano

    or

    http://www.coolgoose.com/sites/pauldixon/

    Copyright 2001 Paul W. Dixon

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Every Best Wish,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    This is getting more bizarre by the post.
     
  8. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    All friends, colleagues and efans: many, many thanks for your kind encouragement in this most tragic concern.

    May we consider the generation of Type Ia supernova from high-energy physics experimentation from a statistical perspective. These supernovae have been observed out to the limits of modern observational astronomy and are sufficiently identical as to be considered standard candles for distance estimates in modern astronomy. These supernovae are some 2.4 times larger than Type II supernovae and yet have origin in solar objects of one solar mass or less. There is also no trace of hydrogen in these objects when they achieve maximum light.

    Historically we note, "innumerable Suns exist: innumerable earths revolve around these Suns in a manner similar to the way seven planets revolve around our sun. Living beings inhabit these worlds ..."
    Giordano Bruno (1548-1600)

    As predicted, the staff at the Fermi National Observatory Laboratory have, despite many warnings, again increased the collisional rate further to 11.83E30 while maintaining the energy level at around 2 TeV. This is far greater energy than anything observed in nature, except perhaps, in the imploding stellar envelope of a Type II supernovae.

    "If they existed they would be here." Enrico Fermi (1901-1954) Are we too moving inevitably towards a final immolation of everything we hold dear for no better reason than to encode another decimal in the standard model in physics?

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Every Best Wish,

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
  9. TruthSeeker Fancy Virtual Reality Monkey Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,162
    Little question...

    Paul,
    Do you have any idea of how many projects of this kind... "suicide"... there are in the world now? If you know... give me some examples... I would like to know, but I don't know how to find it out...

    Blessings,
    Nelson
     
  10. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    Many, many thanks for everyone's very kind assistance and support in this most critical concern.

    May I indicate my willingness to engage in public discussion with Professor Michael Witherell, Director of Fermilab as well as Dr. Ellis, Head of the Theoretical Division at Fermilab at any time on national televison to forestall this tragic plunge into universal catastrophe.

    In the same league as supernova generation from high-energy physics experimentation, would be the dedicated work of all the major world powers, including Russia, Germany, Great Britain, France and the United States in creating more and more potent forms of anthrax to be used in Biological Warfare. A recent seminar for Public Health authorities at Johns Hopkins University, stated that the release of biological agents for terroistic effects heralded the end of civilization. They thus perceived that once this threshold of release for these agents had been passed, within twenty years or so, the mutant German anthrax possessed by Saddam Hussein, for example, would be used as a method of mass destruction. This virulent form of the anthrax spore could not be controlled by those vaccines currently being produced here and in Great Britain.

    Perhaps also the great mass of radioactive material at Chernobyl may still burn throught the concrete pad on which it rests whereupon the effects would according to the news reports make the original release of radioactive material be considered as, " only air freshener."

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf
    now and for all future time.

    All Best Wishes,

    Yours sincerely.

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
  11. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    Kind regards and many, many thanks for everyone's efforts in this most tragic concern

    Current events from the Fermi National Accelerator Webpage, Accelerator Update, indicate that the energies are being gradually increased over time from some 4E30, to 7E30 now to 11.02E30 luminosity at approximately 2 TeV. Thus these vast energies are being ramped up with increased likelihood of forming a transition toward de Sitter space with every increment in energy. This progression can have only one logical outcome in terms of modern physics and that is to release the force of a supernova on our planet, solar sytem and a host of nearby stars. We are thus doomed to immediate vaporization by these vast energies and extinction as a species. It is not certain at what energies this will occur; it is however certain, that with each increment in energy there is an increased probability of forming a transition to de Sitter space, thus releasing the force of supernova upon us.

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Every Best Wish,

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
  12. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    May we thank everyone for their most kind assistance in this tragic concern.

    A recent telephone converstation with a Senior Editor of a newswire service, indicated that a careful review of these considerations revealed that this material concerning supernova generation from high-energy physics experimentation was hard news. Unfortunately, they were unable to bring this news forward since their news service was for lighter and more popular material.

    To quote from the Accelerator Update of Fermilab, "Luminosity is a measure of particle interaction. The higher the luminosity, the greater the chance of quark production." It may also be concluded that the higher the luminosity the greater the danger - owing to increased probability of supernova generation with approximately 2 TeV (trillions of electron volts) level of energetics.

    The measure of luminosity is now at some 11.5E30.

    This work of bringing this news to the attention of the general public and to the scientific community been continuing since 1975 without pause or letup.

    Every child now and for all time will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    All Best Wishes,

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2002
  13. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    <i>This work of bringing this news to the attention of the general public and to the scientific community been continuing since 1975 without pause or letup.</i>

    Hmm... well, top marks for persistence, PWD.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    All friends and colleagues, many, many thanks for your kind assistance in this most tragic concern.

    From the perspective of modern cosmology, de Sitter space is the primordial ylem from which all of the universes are derived. In this false vacuum of de Sitter space, it may be postulated that great variations in energetics are likely to occur . It would, therefore, be predicted that high-energy physics experimentation would be safe at time A, yet at a latter time B, the same level of energetics for high-energy physics experimentation would not be safe due to the variation in the energetics of the de Sitter space substratum.

    Let us halt this reckless plunge into the unknown before it is too late!!!

    All the children will thank you for your most kind efforts on their behalf.

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2002
  15. John Devers (AVATAR) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    120
    Paul, your link at the top of this page A URL of the ZoechlingNew - News Gateway - sciphysics relativity - SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    is a wild goose chase nobody will find any of your arguements or physics there.

    At least give me the rough date of when you posted the information.

    I have been trying to get some facts and figures off you for months as to when you predict this event will occure at what energy levels and the physical process or theory by which this will occure.

    As usual you have side stepped any real facts, theories or links to them.

    Please try posting your facts and figures and theories of how, here.

    Maybe if you could debate some of the physicists here or on the SSSF, the firmilab boys might take you seriously and give you air time.

    Debate the physics, we dare you, put your physics where your mouth is.
     
  16. wet1 Wanderer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,616
    John, as you well know, Paul has a running history in this thread of not answering. That is his gopher hole, if you will. He babbles but he is not going to answer, hence it wll remain babbling.

    When he first started I thought he might have something. That he might be worth listening to. That quickly ended when I found out he was not willing to answer anything. The forums are idea for this kind of blathering. That is why he is here.
     
  17. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    All friends, colleagues and efans: may we thank you for your kind interest and efforts in this most tragic concern.

    As indicated previously, the current work at Fermilab is at some 11.5E30 luminosity with around 2TeV energetics. Where these energies are greater than anything every seen on earth at this highest-energy Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory facility, the risk of a transition towards de Sitter space is very great at all times. This is especially true if we posit that de Sitter space as a primordial false vacuum may show great variation. We are thus faced with the imminent possibility of Type Ia supernova at any moment.

    It may be recommnded that those intersted in these matters review those fundamental works of Albert Einstein concerning the special and generalized theories of relativity. Also in this connection, the brief text entitled, Topology from a Differentiable Viewpoint by John W. Milnor may also be recommended. All of these works are models of clarity and precision and will help to clarify these important issues.

    Every child now and forevermore will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    All Best Wishes,

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2002
  18. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    May we thank everyone for your complete support and cooperation in this most tragic concern.

    In large measure, as it is well known in the world of physics that these high-energy physics experiments consititute a public endangerment via breaching the potential barrier towards a preexistent de Sitter space, the essential theory for Type Ia supernova generation must rest on some sciological basis.

    The impetus for accelerator construction and continued experimentation may begin in a matrix of historical causation. Thus in the case of Fermilab, we are working in the area of "Big Science." Many are employed at the accelerator facility which for many also implies the possibility of socio-economic advancement, i.e., Noble Prizes in Physics with attendant increases in prestige. Thus, the advance in energetics within the ring continues relentlessly to the point of a vast deflagration marking the tragic destruction of yet another world's flower of learning and knowledge. Even the sure knowledge of
    total and complete destruction cannot, it would seem, halt this reckless plunge into final immolation of everything we hold dear.

    All the children now and for all time will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Every best wish,

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
  19. John Devers (AVATAR) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    120

    Paul Dixon, If this is your definition of a theory and figures on the generation of a type 1A SN then I think I can understand why nobody is taking you seriously.

    You really should try learning some physics and math because scientists look at theories based on these not sociology.

    When you have a theory instead of a belief you should really post some of it and some figures.

    Do you know much about de-sitter space and the energy levels predicted to achieve this?

    There are some interesting pdfs with theories and energy levels predicted for de-sitter space and gravatons, would you like me to link to some for you and you can start to learn about what you obviously know nothing about?

    Would you also like me to link to something on energy levels and density? you seem to not be able to talk about these either. Would you like to learn about this before you talk about it?

    yours,

    John Devers, still waiting for just one theory, idea or figure on how this could happen.
     
  20. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

    All friends, colleagues and efans: many, many thanks for your kind thoughts and actions in this most grave matter.

    The luminosity at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory has again been increased to 11.75E30 which places us at yet again a higher risk level for supernova generation. Those very large values for the energetics of de Sitter space are given about midway on page 1 of this thread. We may quote from the works of Galileo Galilei in the year 1622 from his text, Assayer:
    "Philosophy is written in this grand book, the universe which stands continually open to our gaze. But the book cannot be understood unless one first learns to comprehend the language and read the letters in which it is composed. It is written in the language of mathematics, and its characters are triangles, circles, and other geometic figures. Without a knowledge of them, it is humanly impossible to understand a single word of it. Without these, one wanders in a dark and obscure labyrinth."

    In large measure, the essentially geometric works of Einstein and de Sitter are among the most well-established in modern physics, yet the final confirmation of their work will, alas, be in the generation of a Type Ia supernova. The motivation for this reckless plunge into the unknown, it is here posited, comes from the socio-psychologically defined drives and desires of the physicists who would sacrifice everyone for their personal advancement and/or enlightenment.

    All the children will thank you for your most kind actions on their behalf.

    Every best wish,

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2002
  21. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    Paul Dixon,

    You do realise that nothing you've said here over the last few months has advanced your argument at all, don't you?
     
  22. thed IT Gopher Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,105
    You know, I'm deeply confused

    Or at least clueless.

    De Sitter space is one of the classic solutions of the Einstein field equations. It predicted a dynamic universe with some curvature. Now know as &omega;<sub>0</sub>

    Dr. Dixon keeps referring to tunnelling into a De Sitter Space and it releasing energy from a false vacuum. For some reason I can't help but think Dr. Dixon is referring to the Scalar Higgs Field thought to be responsible for Inflation. As per Guth and Albrecht.

    Last I saw De Sitter space had no relation to Inflation, per se. The relation is more like a Model T ford to a modern formula 1 racing car.

    If I have this right, and Paul is right, then Fermi Lab will create a false vacuum that will cause a local mini-Inflation when the false vacuum undergoes spontaneous symmetry breaking, due to a negative pressure density between it and the real vacuum.

    But then ALL Type Ia supernova should have zones of mini-Inflation, shouldn't they?

    Please tell me I am being stupid or totally mis-understanding this.
     
  23. thed IT Gopher Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,105
    Now I understand

    This is a very quick overview of the relation of De Sitter space to the Inflation models. Unfortunately Guths work was brand, spanking new when I was a student and I only learned of it after college.

    As I thought, if Paul is right and the Fermi Labs create a false vacuum by accident an Inflationary event will occur. So if Paul is right all type Ia supernovas are mini-inflation events. Seems to me this is wrong, the signatures of Type Ia supernova are consistent with material falling onto an accretion disk and not expanding regions of spacetime.
     

Share This Page