Temporary banning of Lord Hillyer and Prince_James

If you look at the treatment of race in science in the old days you will notice that you are not white. White never existed as a race. Germans, fins, swedes etc all belong to a difference race according to the extensive old literature. Within the population of Fins there are subdivisions even.

You are merely a product of 20th century American racism where races were divided into black and white for political purposes.

And hence you are just an ignorant racist, the product of American style racism that is not even based on old scientific literature.

Needless to say science grew up and abandoned race in favour of more fruitful scientific classifications. Unfortunately parts of society haven't.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Webcam.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

your tooth is starting to look like panties. uh, er, nevermind.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Spuriousmonkey:

I am well aware of the Nordic, Mediterrenean, and Alpine classifications of some early theories of race in regards to the Europeans.

 

Leopold99:

I don't have black DNA, my good man. Melanin is hardly the factor here being discussed.

Crime scene DNA can even tell you what your grandparents were likely:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-08-16-dna_x.htm

Large-scale differences in DNA by population groups:

http://hum-molgen.org/NewsGen/08-2004/000001.html

 

Then get lost with your white obsession. And get lost with your racist shit.

And if you are going to turn this thread in a racist propaganda shit thread I am going to infraction you. Because it seems you didn't quite get the message when you got banned the last time.

 

really?
you never did describe what "white only" means.

the fact is PJ that "white only" doesn't exist. there is no such animal.

edit:
and cunts do get cranky when they are pregnant.

 

PJ
here's your black:
http://www.nothingtoxic.com/media/1172126563/Monster_of_a_Man_Lifts_a_Refridgerator

 

spuriousmonkey:

Racist propoganda shit?

It's a SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE.

Do you see "Adolf Hilter" in the citations?

Do you see "David Duke" in the citations?

No.

Last I checked, this was supposedly a "science forum". If you don't like my data, show me where it is wrong scientifically.

Moreover: I will not stop this "white obsession". Modern science verifies it through these and other studies. I have more obligation to the truth than to you.

 

That's not a scientific article microcephalon!

 

Bells:

How is it narrow minded to enjoy the company of very remote kin?

Yes. And they can participate in. But we'll simply ignore them.

Post as much as you want in the White Sciforums Member Club. It doesn't matter. But as you are not a member, your opinion won't matter.

Considering it didn't violate what it was claimed to...

No thank you.

I'm afraid I prefer "nananana poo-poo".

I think your blatant abuse of the word is apparent enough to go without further elaboration?

Would you prefer I use the more wordy "Western Indo-European of the Phenotype R1A1 or R1B with exclusive or near-exclusive ancestry in these phenotypes, as expressed by people in the continent of Europe and her seed nations"?

Insults go both ways, darling.

Why don't you give yourself an infraction for calling me a racist and a bigot unwarrantedly?

There is nothing at all in the rules that says "no clubs that segregate based on _____".

That there hasn't been is testament to Lord Hillyer and I not being here. That's all.

By the way: A slip of the finger there. I had meant to say " we are restricting it to a race" not "racist".

Anyway: What malice have I brought here? Besides calling some people out that are spreading filth against myself, Lord Hillyer, and others?

Also, to quote the dictionary on the term racist:

1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

None of that was at all apparent in the thread.

Again: How is it racist? None of the definitions above were met.

Or how about this:

We make a club again, say nothing about segregation, but just ignore non-white participants?

Refused and banned outside the legitimacy of power. James R. is using this as an excuse to go on a crusade and abusing his powers.

Moreover, I calls them as I sees them. Take that as you want.

 

Leopold99:

See my post to Bells for a wordy definition of "white". As apparently, you are completely ignorant of terms used in the vernacular.

 

Spuriousmonkey:

Rectal postule, apparently you have failed to read any of my posts where articles were presented that speak of scientific findings. If you would like to debate them, please publish a study that refutes their claims in a peer-reviewed journal, like they have done and which was reported on.

 

Post a peer-reviewed article showing the existence of biological races. I will read it. And if I find the article itself does not state that there are biological races I will undertake action.

And no funny business of posting some old article. Anyone can find a racist article in the past.

 

you don't need to cop a shitty attitude PJ.
the fact is that i haven't read your posts to bells, K?

in the meantime here's a little something for your sock:
The Only Race Is Human Race
No Biological Basis for Race
New data from the mapping of the human genome reveal that all humans are incredibly similar-in fact, we are 99.9% genetically identical. We are all members of one species, Homo sapiens. Scientists have confirmed, as they long suspected, that there is no genetic or biological basis for race.
http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/genomics/1_identity/ninety_nine.html

 

I don't know who Prince James is trying to kid, he's blatantly racist.

 

Looks like whites are treated badly when they can't even form a whites only forum here without being called nazis. Just another example of the double standard in this society.

 

Spuriousmonkey:

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/search?src=hw&site_area=sci&fulltext=Race

The scientific journal Science. All are paid for, but if you are interested, pursue several of them, all relating to new findings that imply race is indeed a genetic reality.

Specifically consider these:

HUMAN GENETICS: In Asians and Whites, Gene Expression Varies by Race
Jennifer Couzin

CANCER RESEARCH: Probing the Roots of Race and Cancer
Jennifer Couzin
Science 2 February 2007 315: 592-594 [DOI: 10.1126/science.315.5812.592]

Race and Immunity

Science 17 December 2004 306: 2036 [DOI: 10.1126/science.306.5704.2036c]

Specifically, this journal article (not on that list) affirms the usefulness and reality of race:

1 Risch N, Burchard E, Ziv E, Tang H. Categorization of humans in biomedical research: genes, race and disease. Genome Biol 2002;3/7/ comment2007.1–2007.12.

http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1438.html

Affirms the reality of race:

The emerging picture is that populations do, generally, cluster by broad geographic regions that correspond with common racial classification (Africa, Europe, Asia, Oceania, Americas).