The Best Intrest of Your Country

Then the rest is totally irrelevant is it not?

Now if you can show how Saddam Hussein made the US a better country?

What was worth having him gas the Kurds, throw people in acid vats and torture the Iraqis at his pleasure?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

samcdkey,

But it is relevant, you use him to justify your diatribes, and to try top make points, which makes you a hypocrite, because you don't practice his preaching, and impartiality, you always come up with a moral relativism, to make excuses for the Moslem terrorist and their killing of innocent women and children, and then attack the U.S., if your were true to Gandhi and his teachings, you would as he denounce all in clear and uncertain terms, and the interesting thing to ponder is the fact that is way would have only worked against the western world, what would the Islamic republics have done in response to his movement?


He tied down the Iranians at a time when we need them neutralized, and he was in the best interest of our country, He Then went his own way and added to the instability of the middle east, and became not in the best interest of our country, a choice that he made, something like Gandhi and India, when they needed him to achieve independence they revered him and used him and his ways, why they didn't need him any longer they assassinated him, and move away from him, to 15 kilo tons, best interest of the country, Gandhi dead, India moves ahead.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

So you needed Saddam to think for you, not for himself or for his country (oil in euros) and you needed Iran neutralised because you removed Mossadegh for thinking about his country (nationalise oil).

So basically the best interest of the US is to make sure no one thinks about their own country and to torture/kill/remove them if they do.

Thanks. Got it. So basically the US is willing to barter other people's lives for profit.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

samcdkey, you still haven't addressed Gandhi, would you have his blessings? would he condone your attitude? you talk of wanting peace but you condone Islam's use of murder, by making a moral revivalism, you would be far more believable if you attacked your Islamic terrorist brethren with the same vigor as you do the U.S.

 

Considering that all the Islamic brethren so far have been trained either by the US or their allies Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, I'm surprised you haven't embraced them. Bartering people's lives, raping 14 year old girls and shooting 5 year olds in the heads appears to be an American pastime after all. You should be in bed with al-Qaeda. For the best intrest of your country, that is. You're already kissing Saud's ass anyway, why not pimp for OBL too? Its not like there are any principles involved.

 

samcdkey, your to predictable, you have become boring,

And your proof of this, the war in Afghanistan? that was 20 years ago, you want to claim that these are the same people from a war 20 years ago?

Bartering peoples lives?

And the troops that were involved in the rape of one 14 year old girl were tried and prosecuted, found guilty and sent to prison, when have your buddies your Islamic brothers, ever, tried and convicted their own butchering , raping, murdering, bastards, please tell me? or do they get accolades from the Moslems like you, and excused their minor indiscretions because they did it for Allah, and the Prophet?

And your the one whoring for OBL, with ever post that makes a moral relativism between the murderous, raping, using children to get their bombs through security, and then blowing them up, Islamic bastard that you defend, yes, I might be a pimp in your eyes but you have full qualifications as a whore for OBL.

 

Whoops!

Looks like the US is way ahead of me in this too!

Supporting Shia militia in Iraq and Sunni militia in Lebanon and Iran.

In bed with everyone, aren't you!

As for rape!

http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/1813/Female_Troops_Fear_Sexual_Assault_by_Comrades

 

samcdkey, and you practice the same thing in your personnel life, were did you go to get your vaunted education?, India?, China?, Russia?, a Madras?, a Islamic university?, no you came to the United States, transacted with the government for a visa, to get your education from our public universities, so in your own best interest, you concluded a treaty with a government that you hate to advance your own best interest, very Hypocritical, and 4 faced.

 

More BS. Working for your best interest is capitalism. But torturing and killing people for your best interest is just sick.

By the way, just who is the US fighting with in their warrrrr on terorrrrr, since they are supporting all the militants themselves?

 

samcdkey,

but isn't that what your Islamic brethren are working against?, and it seems that it is also against the Quran. There are many thing that you have done in violation of the tenants of your religion, do you wee the burka? are you accompanied by male relatives when you leave your house, are you divorced? do you flirt with men? do you drink alcohol? yes there are many thing that you do in your own personnel interest that make you as much a hypocrite as the government that you love to criticize.

samcdkey,

And isn't that exactly the method of attack that your Islamic heroes, that you defend with your moral relativism's, use to spread their terrorism?

 

So then you support your government supporting the militants?

Seems like there is no argument here. Everyone is working in their best interest, which in the US involves attacking countries that threaten the dollar and funding dictators and terrorists to ensure it does not happen.

So if the militants are working for the US, why is there a war on terror? Should it not be the war for terror?


btw, you live as much in the dark ages as your asskissed Sauds. Only republicans and fundamentalist Muslims have those ideas about Muslims anymore.

 

samcdkey,

But those are the tenants of your religion, and that is exactly what the terrorist of your religion, that you defend with your moral relativisms want to bring to the world, the pure Islamic slavery of the Quran, as interpreted by them, and you defend their actions, their torturing and killing people for their best interest, that is just sick, with ever moral relativism that you post you subscribe to the Terrorist goal of enslaving the world and your self under the strict interpretation of the Terrorist Quran.

 

So you ARE comfortable with the US supporting terrorism, in their best interest, as your complete avoidance of the issue shows. And you prefer them to especially support fundamentalists to keep them in power and prevent democracy in the ME.

Thanks. Done here.

 

samcdkey, no sam your are trying to put words in my mouth, I am just showing how much of a hypocrite that you are in your personnel life, and political beliefs, I don't have a way of knowing how accurate your sources are and I don't have the whole story of what took place, but if it was in the best interest of the country at the time, I support it, and in the end lets look at the different visions for the world as put forth by your Heroes the Islamic Terrorist that you defend with your moral relativism.

A Pan Islamic World, under their strict interpretation of the Quarn and Sharia' Laws, the subjugation of women back the harem, and the destruction of all other religions, a world of the Afghan Taliban, you do remember them, no schooling for women? the Religious Police? the killing of rape victims?, the execution of homosexuals, the Blowing up of historic art works?, yes sam what vision of the world are you defending?

The western cultures, that practice freedom of religion, the rights of women, cherish cultural works of art, all arts, music, sculpture, paintings, stage, protect the right of minorities, advance the education of all, and give more in charity to the rest of the world than all of Islam, makes for their own pockets, Yes sam what vision are you attacking?

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

samcdkey, and is this not the custom of your religion? and it's polite etiquette? as a sign of friendship and respect?

 

:yawn:

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Buffalo Roam: "this not the custom of [Islam]?"

No it is not. The image is a roughly-edited satire.

"and it's polite etiquette?"

That would be an embrace, and a kiss on alternate cheeks, generally two pecks, and more for effusive greetings. Such customs are independent of Islam, and probably pre-date it.

" as a sign of friendship and respect?"

You consistently show that you have much to learn about Islam, Mideast customs, and Mideast politicsBR. Yet you stubbornly refuse to acknowledge your lack of basic knowledge and understanding.

There is no shame in gaps in your knowledge- we all have those. But it is shameful to display your lack of knowledge, while consistently dismissing the efforts of those who are trying to help you make important discoveries about cultures and issues you are confused about.

 

samcdkey, after some reflection I get what your meaning for post 655#, that when the men of Islam greet each other this way they are kissing ass, so that means in your opinion, that they are speaking out their ass? Is this not the way that Mohammed greeted his visitors?