The Site itself is the evidence, and I already know it is not enough to convice many and I already know it needs to be studied more by qualified people. The Traditional location for Mt. Sinai is false and has always been false. If you think it is real then I guess you would agree that the Exodus was real on that very basis. If not, then it is a very poor argument. You are basically saying that the location of one thing, that doesn't exist, falsifies something that does. Go look up the history of that site and you will see how bogus it is. The Real Mt Sinai is located in Saudi Arabia and always has been. The Site is self evident, regardless of Ron Wyatt or anyone else. Ron Wyatt did not create the mountain that exists in Saudi Arabia or any of the sites there. It was all there before any of us were ever born. Your arguments are very poor Bells. I really think you need a time out!
Just to remind everyone of the purpose of the thread: If you want to believe, based on the Bible account, do that. The rest of us. Lets talk about the evidence.
It is actually quite simple.. People will ask for you to provide evidence of it. Archaeological evidence, for example. 600,000 men, plus women, children, the elderly and their livestock would have left a veritable mountain of evidence. They have left nothing at all. There is also no evidence of them in Egypt and no evidence they built the pyramids. Mention of the chariots, etc, as stated in the bible when chariots had not even been invited yet. Providing images of rock carvings that a known fraud has apparently decided must represent the golden calf is not proof.
Here is a Bible quote for you: "When Pharaoh let the people go, God did not lead them by way of the land of the Philistines, although that was near. For God said, “Lest the people change their minds when they see war and return to Egypt...Hence God led the people around by the way of the wilderness to the Red Sea..."
Attilla the Hun perhaps. Other than him, I don't know. Everyone wears masks. People who try to prove the Bible account are often very duplicitous. I prefer people who just say they believe. That is more honest.
How many times have you been to a given place for which no evidence exists of your having been there?
People who believe the bible account know they are duplicitous. It is what leads them to their Savior.
That is a remark you should think about more deeply. Does God insist that we believe what we know to be false?
Think about it. Thousands of people setting up camps for 40 years. But no evidence of it. Why not? Where are the places where they cooked? Where are the shards of pottery? Where are the places they dumped their waste? Where are the remains of food? There should be hundreds of encampment sites showing evidence of habitation.
Perhaps, because they are looking in the wrong place? Just an idea. Of course there is no evidence at all at the Traditional location for Mt Sinai. Simply because it is not the real Site.
