The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by George E Hammond, Jan 16, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    The first paper on the website !

    – it is IDENTICAL to the OP
    (original first post) of this thread.

    And is entitled: –

    The first experimental measurement
    of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

    Which also has the alternate title: –

    The Psychometric
    Measurement of God


    It is 1300 words long

    George
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Baldeee Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,123
    Being identical to the OP, it is garbage, as your OP has been shown to be over the past 64 pages.
    Do you not have anything that, you know, addresses the multitude of challenges, the shortfalls, the logically fallacious reasoning, the inconsistencies, the factual errors, that your OP is littered with?
    Or is this really all you've managed to put together?

    I can summarise it with the following title:-
    It is garbage.

    Which also has the alternate title:-
    It is pseudo-scientific nonsense.

    Including the title, a more-than-adequate summary of your "proof" is either 3 or 4 words long.
    You can re-read this thread for explanations of why, and maybe this time you'll have the decency to address the issues/challenges raised.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,635
    Poor George, he's got nothing and that means 65 pages of his tripe will be locked, or better yet tossed into the cesspool. I hope he doesn't call the FBI...
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    I did a Google search for "pseudo-scientific garbage" and got 4.6 million hits.
     
    origin likes this.
  8. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    When Gustav Eiffel erected his famous tower
    in 1889 in Paris there was an engineering
    Assistant nicknamed "Luckeee" who was very
    critical of Eiffel.

    He published his own critique listing
    hundreds of "so-called" important FLAWS
    in Eiffel's design and construction, including:

    Rusty rivets
    dented trusses
    cracks in concrete
    rust stains from rain
    nesting pigeons
    tourist graffiti
    snarled kites and balloons
    blowing newspapers
    etc. etc.

    In fact he claimed there were "thousands
    of flaws" in the Eiffel tower
    , and that Eiffel
    was delinquent in not addressing them.

    On Sciforums a character named "Baldeee"
    has claimed the same thing about Hammond's
    Scientific Proof of God (SPOG). Of course, truth
    be known, Baldeee's criticisms are just as
    inconsequential and meaningless as Luckeee's
    in the opinion of any competent scientist.

    Meanwhile, it is becoming clearer and clearer
    that Hammond's SPOG is in fact a genuine
    (and indeed miraculous)

    ACCIDENTAL SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY.

    Which reminds me that 2000 years ago a
    kid was born in a barn in Israel and was
    believed by the locals to be "the son of God".
    Many of the locals insisted that the infant
    was actually a devil – and urged the Inn
    owner to drown the baby in the Inn's
    cesspool.

    Not much unlike the present situation with
    Hammond's SPOG – where several of the
    Sciforums participants are chanting the
    forum's administrators to cast the SPOG
    into the Sciforums "cesspool".

    Hammond would only point out what a
    devastating historical turn of events it
    would have been had the Inn owner
    drowned the "son of God" in the Inn's
    cesspool –

    And I would only suggest to the administrators
    of Sciforums – that casting the world's first
    SPOG into their cesspool could turn out to be
    a devastating publicity debacle somewhere
    down the road, in the near future.

    Just a friendly piece of cautionary scientific
    advice.

    George
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2022
  9. Baldeee Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,123
    Ah, the Galileo Gambit is played once again.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Guess which part of the diagram you fit into, Mr. Hammond?



    (Credit to Rationalwiki.org for the diagram)
     
    Michael 345 likes this.
  10. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Na Baldeee – you're 2 centuries off –
    this is the "FARADAY gambit" not the
    "GALILEO gambit".

    Hammond ACCIDENTALLY discovered the world's
    first Scientific Proof of God (SPOG) just like Faraday
    accidentally discovered the electromagnetic field.

    Hammond noticed that the psychometrists had
    noticed that the 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 Factor
    Personality Models were CUBICALLY
    intercorrelated in 3-D space.

    Being a physicist, he set about finding out WHY.
    He soon discovered that it was caused by the
    embryological cubic cleavage of the brain –
    and over the years discovered that there was
    a (cubic) decussation in Jeffrey Gray's
    septo-hippocampal system thus confirming
    the existence of "13 cubic symmetry axis
    Factors" in the long sought for
    Structural Model of Personality (SMOP).

    Since it was known by then that there were
    exactly 4 orders Of Personality Eigenvectors,
    it was clear that only the 2nd orders were the
    Personality Types and according to Cattell
    there were 12 of them – and quite obviously
    were the "12 Olympian gods" of antiquity.

    This indicates directly that the single 4th
    order eigenvector is obviously the
    "God of the Bible" – since the "age of the gods"
    directly proceeded the "age of God" – which
    immediately superseded it.

    Simply using evidence from the "Movie
    Projector Picture Fusion Frequency"
    (Edison) for "mental speed" and
    simple size measurement for growth
    shows that the psychology metric
    (ENPg) is a "space-time metric"
    of "subjective space-time" just like
    the ordinary metric (XYZt) is the
    metric of "objective space-time".

    And since the higher order factor
    (square root of) the (ENPg) metric
    is the "GFP" (single 4th order factor)
    the GFP (the God of the Bible) is
    obviously a: –

    God is a (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE
    of SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME


    Which shows that I ACCIDENTALLY
    discovered the world's first
    Scientific Proof of God just like
    Faraday ACCIDENTALLY discovered
    the electromagnetic field !

    George
    PS – please excuse typos
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2022
  11. Baldeee Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,123
    Once again you seem to fail to grasp things.
    Ah, well.
    Only to be expected.

    I'll now reply to anything new you have to offer in the rest of your bloated post...
    Oh, look at that: nothing new.
    Why don't you go back and actually start addressing the issues and challenges, Mr. Hammond, rather than just vomiting up the same garbage again and again.
    That's all we ask of you.
    Or continue to be the delusional dishonest crank that you clearly want us to believe you to be.
     
  12. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    I'm not to spend my time explaining why
    there are a few loose rivets in the Eiffel tower,
    as I said in post #1285

    You're way in over your head Baldeee
    with no scientific credentials, to the
    point of sounding ludicrous.

    Head for shore before you drown yourself !

    George
     
  13. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    Clearer to whom?
    So the lesson for today, kids, is: It's a good idea to have insurance to minimize the bad effects of accidents.
    SOMEBODY has to look for loose rivets or the Eiffel Tower would fall down.
     
  14. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Message to – James R, moderator
    Sciforums:

    James, the "shortest complete proof of God"
    is now contained in my post #1287 on
    page 65


    George
     
  15. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,635
    I'm kinda surprised this thread is still here. Post 1287 has no proof of God, as a matter of fact there is not even any evidence of God in that post.
     
  16. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    The discovery of the world's first
    scientific proof of God (SPOG) will
    ecumenically spearhead world
    Religion for a millennium.

    Will probably be instrumental in
    solving the problem of
    Global Warming.

    It's over your head because you
    wouldn't know a Christoffel
    symbol from Christopher
    Columbus.

    George
     
  17. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,635
    There's no proof, so no world wide fame is coming your way. Sorry.
     
  18. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    "Origin" – your post has been
    reported to the moderator.
    – No scientific content
    ad hominem heckling
    further abuse ditto.

    George
     
  19. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    June 12, 2022
    BOWDEN –
    MY GOD ! HOW DID YOU FIND ME ?
    .

    Directeur de Rcherche Émérite au CNRS
    Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique /
    French National Centre for Scientific Research

    .
    WE ARE THE SAME AGE BTW–
    You replied to me on sci.physics.relativity
    and then I saw the director of CNRS Marseille
    had hit my website – and I figured out it was
    you !
    I have posted 2 new messages to you on
    sci.physics.relativity
    they are copied below
    please reply on sci.physics.relativity
    since I prefer talking in public.
    .
    George E Hammond MS physics Cape Cod Massachusetts
    .
    .
    George Hammond
    Jun 11, 2022, 7:41:01 PM (5 hours ago)
    to
    .
    > And this is published where? Web of
    Science doesn't seem to know about it.
    > > –
    >
    >
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Dear Prof. Bowden –
    I know you are the author of –
    FUNDAMENTALS OF ENZYME KINETICS 4th edition
    so I have a couple of questions for you: –
    1. Why are you reading sci.physics.relativity ?
    2. Do you have any idea what "Personality Psychometry" is ?
    3. What on earth is your interest in the fact that some Physicist
    has discovered that: –
    .
    GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE
    OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
    .
    With best professional regards,
    George E Hammond MS physics Cape Cod
    Massachusetts
    .
    George Hammond
    Jun 11, 2022, 9:06:47 PM (4 hours ago)
    to
    [POSTSCRIPT GE Hammond MS physics]
    June 11, 2022
    We are the same age – I turned 80 last month
    so – time is of the essence.
    .
    While the scientific explanation of "God" has
    been signed sealed and delivered: –
    .
    GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE
    OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME

    .
    there still remains the question of "life after death"
    (LAD). My research shows that there is better than
    1 chance in 3 that there IS such a thing.
    SEE:
    https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_simple_airbag_theory_of_Life_After_Death
    .
    Your expertise in Quantum Mechanical Chemistry
    would be extremely useful in evaluating this
    microtubule phenomenon.
    .
    GE Hammond MS physics Cape Cod Massachusetts
     
  20. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics Hyannis Massachusetts]
    June 12, 2022
    Dear Prof.Bowden –
    Look, you're a bigshot chemist, Oxford graduate,
    emeritus director of research at CNRS, have
    published 200 papers and books, some of them in
    the 4th edition.
    I'm a nobody MS physicist, who has made an
    ACCIDENTAL scientific discovery.
    .
    The situation has a well known PRECEDENT in
    history. Michael Faraday threw a switch on an electric circuit and noticed a nearby Compass jump.
    He realized the electric current was causing a
    magnetic field.
    Faraday's boss was Sir Humphrey Davy, and Davy
    had nothing but contempt for Faraday, in fact he
    tried to publicly crucify him professionally for
    becoming famous.
    .
    YOU ARE DAVY AND I AM FARADAY]
    – ALL OVER AGAIN !
    .
    Chemists answer to the Nobel committee – but
    physicists answer to God – don't forget it !
    .
    .
    You have made the following comments to me on
    sci.physics.relativity: –

    [PROF. BOWDEN EMERITUS RESEARCH
    DIRECTOR EMERITUS CNRS-MARSEILLE
    FRANCE ].
    .
    1. – What have you published in the physics
    literature?
    I haven't been able to find anything.
    I've only been able to find this (psychology, not
    physics):
    George E. Hammond: New Ideas in Psychology
    "The Cartesian theory: Unification of Eysenck and
    Gray
    Hmm. A grand total of one citation in 28 years..
    .
    2. – "Scientific Proof of God" – Web of Science
    doesn't seem to know about it..
    .
    3. –Do you have any idea what "Personality
    Psychometry" is ? Yes. So what?
    .
    4. –In what sense are you a physicist. No PhD;
    no published research in physics? Where did
    you get your MS in physics? Bob Jones? Biola?.
    .
    5. –I have no recollection of "hitting" your
    website. When do you think I did this? What is
    its address? I haven't found it.
    Are you calling Academia your website?
    .
    >> And this is published where? Web of Science
    doesn't seem to know about it.
    No answer to this simple question, but I'm not
    holding my breath..
    .
    [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS
    HYANNIS MASSACHUSETTS]
    .
    Okay – let me answer your questions: –
    .
    My CV is publicly posted here: –
    https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae
    .
    I published my only peer-reviewed paper in 1994
    – but then in 1997 – I realized that led to the
    World's first scientific proof of God.
    It took me 28 years to PROVE IT – now I've got
    the proof, and here I am, wondering what to
    do with it?
    No reputable journal in the world would published
    a "scientific proof of God" – therefore, my only
    alternative is to post it all over the
    Internet – and that's how you heard about me!
    .
    Yes, academia.edu is my only "website": –
    https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond
    .
    [GE Hammond MS physics Hyannis Massachusetts]
    Okay, so here's where we are: –
    You're probably the most influential scientist I've
    met since I met Hans Eysenck in Montréal in 1996.
    He was a lot more sober and scientifically/politically
    aware than you are. He was also a lot more famous.
    He was of course the world's leading authority on
    "Personality Psychometry" – and frankly I am quite
    surprised to find out that you even know what
    Personality Psychometry is !
    ... A worldwide army of academic Psychometry
    researchers using desktop computers for the last
    50 years have discovered the entire eigenvector
    structure of Personality.
    ... The eigenvector pyramid ends in a SINGLE
    EIGENVECTOR (dubbed the GFP – Gen. factor
    of Psychology) at the top of the pyramid – and they
    don't know what it is – the top factor, the GFP, is a
    COMPLETE SCIENTIFIC MYSTERY.
    .
    ... What I have discovered is that the entire
    eigenvector pyramid is caused by the underlying
    embryological cubic cleavage of the brain – and
    since a cube has 13 rotational symmetry axes –
    there are EXACTLY 13 personality types
    at the 2nd order – which turn out to be the
    12 Olympian godsof antiquity.
    .
    ... This immediately tells us that the mysterious
    top eigenvector (the GFP) can be nothing other
    than "the God of the Bible".
    ... Knowing this – it is easy to show, the top
    eigenvectoris in fact: the God of the Bible and
    that –
    .
    GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE
    OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME

    .
    Of course this will come as no surprise to the
    religious people who have suspected since 1915
    that "Einstein's theory"was probably a scientific
    proof of God – and now we see that in fact it is!
    .
    Finally – some people may wonder "so what"?
    What practical use the scientific proof of God
    have?
    ... Well, let me tell you, it may become very
    important vis-à-vis the ultimate existential
    challenge we face with GLOBAL WARMING.
    ...The scientific proof of God will de facto
    ecumenically unite all 5 of the world's major
    religions – Christianity, Islam, Judaism,
    Hinduism and Buddhism. It is the only scientific
    discovery that can possibly get them all on the
    same page. And this is important because
    ultimately it will probably require a unified global
    human effort to stop global warming, may even
    require social engineering on a global scale – and
    the discovery of the world's first scientific proof of God (SPOG) can do nothing but help matters in
    that regard.
    .
    George E Hammond MS physics
    Hyannis June 12, 2022

     
  21. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    One anecdote about criticism does not demonstrate that everybody who is criticized is right.
     
  22. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Dr. Athel Cornish-Bowden
    Directeur de Rcherche Émérite au CNRS
    (French National Centre for Scientific Research)
    Marseille France

    Has apparently had 2nd thoughts about making
    any further wiseguy comments about my
    post #1297 which was originally posted on
    sci.physics.relativity on June 12, 2022

    After making his preliminary wiseguy
    remarks, my last post apparently has
    scared him off – and apparently he has
    thought better of his wiseguy remarks
    and realized that he was in far deeper
    waters then he assumed.

    I guess I'm still looking for
    Sir Humphrey Davy
    and Prof. Athel Cornish-Bowden
    turned out to be just another useless
    window shopping tourist like the
    rest of you.

    George
     
  23. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    You didn't respond to what I said. Here it is again: One anecdote about criticism does not demonstrate that everybody who is criticized is right.

    I was talking about Davy's criticism of Faraday, not Bowden's criticism of you - my point being that Davy's criticism of Faraday did not make Faraday right and Bowden's criticism of you does not make you right.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page