Mod commit i warned you about turning this thread into a moderator critique. This is the last warning. It's none of your business why a thread was send to the cesspool. And if you think it is your business there are two threads in the Open Government subforum where you can discuss the matter and you have your own blog Obviously you did demonstrate bias, since you didn't post any link showing HIV is the sole cause of AIDS. Show that this in any way disproves that HIV causes AIDS. The jury is not out in the scientific community. It is rather in agreement. Please show that there is a controversy. A website does not constitute a scientific controversy. You are merely showing a figment of your imagination. Search the literature and you will find out the debate pretty much ended in 1995 in the scientific community with some spasms till 1998. If you had bothered to actually look at the scientific debate you would see it started off soon after the first HIV/AIDS papers and died after 1995. That's because the consensus is nowadays that HIV is the direct cause of AIDS because the debate turned out to be unfruitful for the doubters. But feel free to show there is a controversy in the scientific community. May I remind you that you basically in the position of a creationist who claims the entire scientific community is wrong because there are 2 or 3 scientists who believe in the AIDS conspiracy. I have a simple question for you though. Would you let yourself be injected with HIV? After all, it is innocent according to you.