Discussion in 'Politics' started by Beaconator, May 15, 2019.
She wasn't a predator she was a drunk. Asserting your own experience into mine is a simple mistake.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
a jury must be of peers
not of innocents
this case has been tested.
bias is defined not by lack of innocence , but by pre-assumptive conclusion of moral directive.
Because Germans are not free and contracts "though legally binding" are the very thing used by powerful people in order to escape good conduct and conscious and allow evil to pervade in today's time.
The saying, "be careful who you get in bed with" comes from somewhere and is often used before signing contracts.
Pardon my lack of remorse at the disturbing grammar.
re-valuing the nature of the terms of informed consent...(no... NO... No....nO.... saying no to everything doesnt change the nature of the subject being discussed & doesnt offer any further concept of definition, it is an emotional reaction to not being able to clarify something that your unable to emotionally come to terms with)
have you discussed predatory groping behaviours with groups of only women before ?
are you wanting to discuss developmental human behaviour or social culture regulation ?
the 2 are quite different
the women who rroped you was late 50s alcoholic and just divorced from her wife ? (you seem to wish to break everything down into black & white to prevent discussion of the nature rather than offer nature for the discussion, you may think your subtle in that but your not)
that is a philisophical political debate which you have not outlined instead your applying dog-whistle politics to it.
that doesn't advance the discussion it derails it.
how many co-ed LGBTQ+inclusive adult only sexual themed social events have you been to(roughly) ?
This is so wrong I don't know where to begin.
Bias is an inescapable fact of the very nature of linguistic conclusions. Prejudice is the type of bias you expressed in an elegant format I might add. A misunderstanding that I believe lies at the very heart between emotions and our ability to express them. Words use other words to define them in an endless cycle of jargon and "intent" of the word itself. But there is no substitution for feeling and far too many either incapable of empathy or with grievous misuse of their words.
Um... None. But I find all "sex" parties gross. I would never go to a sex club just because of the compliance with baser instincts is just too predatory a suggestion. The need to please oneself through others is vile.
Butigieg wants to abolish the electoral college.
autistic asexual ...
you have 0 experience to discuss the complexities of predatory social behaviours when it comes to sex & social culture.
some people go through phases like that in their lifes for varying reasons.
there is a VAST difference between "sexually themed social events" and a "sex club"
inside the nature of "sex club" there is yet again an even vaster difference in types.
you are around 16 years old. pushed into an adults political world.
politics is about morality and culture and commerce.
though most have interactions of all 3
it does not mean that you have any legitimate wisdom or knowledge just because you define yourself as having to be self justified in having an opinion about a commerce financial transaction natured inside a political frame work.
But you can't even tell us the name of the news, it seems.
I can. You just simply did not ask in a manner I would be able to understand. (=
You see I do have one simple vice. Yet that is not so much to win arguments or even express "truth above all else".
"We have art in not dying for the truth"-Nietzsche
This means not becoming angry at the sight of truth.
I withheld that I watch many news sources including One America News.
It makes me smile to withhold for good intent.
"Declassification is right around the corner"-Mark Meadows
CNN says some unnamed judge issued a subpoena for Trumps financial records.
How bizarre. Beaconators Message count does not increase. It's been stuck on 665 since page 1 of this thread alone.
Now that I'm checking, my count is also stuck.
CNN named the judge.
The subpoena was for specific records relevant to the particular legal case - not "Trump's financial records".
Why do you post obvious and easily checked falsehoods?
Again - if you restrict your news to liars, such as whoever told you the Mueller report had been released to Congress without redactions, you will eventually lose track of reality.
It might not have been congress. Probably went to the corrupt "second chance report". Whoever is in charge of that.
Apparently it wasn't relevant to anything and will not pass go or collect 200$.
What's the case about?
Key testimony was overlooked that could have acquitted Popadopolis.
How would you know? You don't even know the name of the judge, which CNN handed you.
That's the judge who determined its relevance.
No testimony was overlooked.
When you have figured out what you are trying to talk about, don't forget to include it in your posts.
If you're looking at the post count under the name/pic of the poster, this will always show their total post count at the time you read the post, not when the post was made.
But the number is not increasing at all.
edit; maybe there is a delay in the addition.
Separate names with a comma.