The Universe is in a Blackhole?

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by DavidG, Dec 15, 2018.

  1. DavidG Registered Member

    Messages:
    1
    It may seem a bit odd to believe that a universe could be contained inside a blackhole but it makes a lot of sense. The universal background is entirely black and the universe is growing pretty fast. So I come to the conclusion that what we think of as the Big Bang is like a blackhole that burped firing jets of energy and since time and space completely break down inside a blackhole, it would explain why we won’t see an event like that again. Also, maybe the stuff that a blackhole eats gets funneled into the universe it connects to like a drain filling that universe making it expand at a fast rate.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,601
    Perhaps define your black hole.
    My impression a black hole is a lot of empty space with something in the center that is very dense.
    Alex
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 69 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,470
    and inside that very dense object is more dense stuff, and it ain't us

    PS you ain't updated your profile following your minor change operation

    Have you kept the beard?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,601
    Keeping the beard seems there are very few bearded lady acts these days so I could clean up.

    Feeling better today and stopped the pain killers.

    Its still hard to walk but I guess it always has been...just a little tight ...was on the shin so closing the wound meant a bit a a stretch.

    If the sky is clear up your way tonight have a look around the 7 sisters there is a commmet that should be visable if you are naked...well at least your eyes...cloudy here and disappointing not being able to see it and get a photo.

    I have read something along the lines of the op years ago and I cant understand how one could think that way...unless folk view it as a gateway ... its not but folk get some funny ideas sometimes.
    And how can black holes be called black? They dont give out anything...they should be called stingey holes☺

    Alex
     
  8. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 69 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,470
    Think Hawkins changed his mind about Black Holes not giving off anything

    To lazy to look for a reference to give you and / or DavidG but do suggest (like yourself) DavidG give his definition of a Black Hole, perhaps after reading up a bit more about them

    Welcome to you DavidG

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    RainbowSingularity likes this.
  9. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,768
    = no burp ?

    no not really because by your own words ...
    however...
    if you roll up all of what you have implied...
    then mash it together...
    then squish it about a bit
    then hammer it out flat on a table...

    you may wish to read about bubble universe theory
    https://www.space.com/32728-parallel-universes.html
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

    there are some technical complications in your suggestion based on light and matter being able to be projected out from in the centre of a black hole while all other light and matter is sucked in.
    however... putting that to one side.
    if you suggest the black hole IS the universe, or the black hole is inside a bubble universe, then your idea has a little more traction.

    the fundermental hiccup is the concept of light and matter defying its own laws of gravity of the black hole.

    keeping in mind black holes are still unknown phenomina to science.
    kinda like dark energy
    it seems they are there, they are kinda detectable, but humans dont really understand them yet.
     
  10. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,768
    wasnt that one of his last adaptations to his last most substantial theory ?
    regarding hawkings radiation ?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

    if i remember his adaptation and/or find it i will post a link
    something something dark energy we dont know something something... quite likely pissible something something... we have no proof it cant come from inside something something big bang waves might be doing it something something ...
    it goes something like that

    there must be a physicist who knows it verbatum
     
  11. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,812
    No you've got it exactly. It's known as the "quite likely pissible something something theory".
     
    Xelasnave.1947 and Michael 345 like this.
  12. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,902
    And that was not a typo.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 69 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,470
    I love the concept

    Even if it sounds like it is taking the piss out of the French accent trying to say possible

    But I know it is not

    Will use "pissible theory" from now onwards to describe theories full of Cowpat

    The first poster should put it in New Sayings

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,768
    https://www.theguardian.com/science...gs-final-theory-sheds-light-on-the-multiverse


     

Share This Page