The Weak Force's Problem

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Willem, Apr 30, 2019.

  1. NotEinstein Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,986
    exchemist: ^This is for you.

    Good, I'm glad we cleared that up.

    What is an "LHC mass"? And what is a "W program"?

    This is nonsense: the PDF isn't used to build a collider. Also, all protons are interchangeable in the Standard Model, so please provide an explanation about these "special protons" and evidence for them existing.

    Protons don't read: they are illiterate.

    Please provide evidence that protons are conscious entities.

    ...and why is this thread in the science section?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Willem Banned Banned

    Messages:
    283
    Large Hadron Collider's program to get the mass of the W+- boson.

    There was experiments that confirmed particles are conscious of being observed, for example the double slit experiment and variants.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. NotEinstein Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,986
    Why single out the LHC specifically? Here are some more measurements: http://pdglive.lbl.gov/DataBlock.action?node=S043M
    Notice that ALL of them are quite compatible with what the LHC is measuring. Please provide evidence that ALL of these experiments are faulty too.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,570
    I see I have already asked that this idiotic garbage be moved to pseudoscience or the toilet, I feel like asking again after that moronic statement.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    edit: oops, I forgot for a second that he is just trolling to annoy. still belongs in the cesspool!
     
  8. NotEinstein Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,986
    Then he's doing a bad job at trolling, because I'm entertained instead of annoyed.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. Willem Banned Banned

    Messages:
    283
    They sate: "sample consists of 7.8×10^6 candidates in the W→μν channel and 5.9×10^6 candidates in the W→eν channel."

    So they didn't actually detect a W, just it's theoretically predicted products - so the theory did go into their results. I must still read if they distinguished it form pi-minus decay events. They didn't mention this in the Abstract.

    It is going to take time to go through all the experiments.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2019
  10. NotEinstein Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,986
    Please tell us then: how would you go about detecting a particle that's so unstable it decays before it can touch a detector? Also, indirect evidence is still evidence. On top of that, there is currently only one hypothesis that explains the measured data: the Standard Model of particle physics.

    You are invited to come up with something better. After all, that's the goal of science.

    Please let us know the outcome of your investigations.

    Well, that's the work that you created for yourself, so have fun!

    And please respond to the parts of post #21 that you skipped.
     
  11. Willem Banned Banned

    Messages:
    283
    I need time so I'm not going to post for a time.
     
  12. NotEinstein Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,986
    OK. Good luck on your quest to learn the basics of particle physics, and have fun!
     

Share This Page