Theism vs. Atheism - Experience or Interpretation?

Discussion in 'Religion Archives' started by Diogenes' Dog, Aug 20, 2006.

?

Is theism vs. atheism primarily a difference of interpretation or experience?

  1. Theism and atheism are primarily different interpretations of similar experiences.

    21 vote(s)
    51.2%
  2. Theism and atheism lead to very different experiences.

    12 vote(s)
    29.3%
  3. Some other view.

    8 vote(s)
    19.5%
  1. Enterprise-D I'm back! Warp 8 Mr. Worf! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,898
    Thank you Sarkus, quite correct, indeed and good show. Roman simply ascribed traits of biology onto an invention because biological beings created it. Which is what I should have simply said in the first place.

    Roman, your style led me to believe you were theist actually. Apologies

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    ...but religion is still a lifeless invention.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Enterprise-D I'm back! Warp 8 Mr. Worf! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,898
    Dyslexia is a brain shortcoming preventing the acquisition of an invented language, not a language in and of itself.


    Correct, I said that. All languages are inventions hence not biological. The ability to invent language is an evolutionary trait.

    Who is Bora Lee anyway?


    Cute Sam, very cute

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.

Share This Page