Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by adhams, Dec 12, 2014.
I'd like to read it -meh I'm a gambler.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
Pls ask anything about the theory of everything pls note that it's under development and don't tell me how is it the theory of everything when u are developing it coz it's simply is
It simply is bullshit and trolling.
Utter crap! Instead of psyco analysing anyone else, you should do an honest self diagnosis and then take an aspro and have a good lie down. Because you are really impressing no one.
Sorry but it's underdevelopment
Ask ask ask my theory explains gravity electricity and nuclear energy with one punch and iam hoping to develop the theory to include relativity
We have a poster on this forum called Farsight.
You and him are kindred souls.
Crap it is, and crap your claims remain.
That's great! Discussing physics I mean. Does that mean then you will stop and delusional false unsupported claim of having a TOE?
Do you know what a scientific theory is?
You do not have a scientific theory......all you have at best, is an unsupported hypothesis, that will eventually fade into oblivion.
No no no.
Iam lurking at the bottom so ask ask ask
Why not I'll bite. Explain nuclear energy.
Alrighty! I just found that this also need development
When u shoot a neutron at an atom the atom absorbs it more specifically the proton or another neutron when this happens the proton or neutron have more capacity to absorb more space leading to decrease in the space between the neutrons and protons so they demand more space and they go away from the neutron or proton that absorbed the initial neutron(one fired at the neutron or proton) leading to spread out of materials from the stuff that went away now here is the tricky part that I wanted to develop why does when the neutron go away from the space absorbing neutron it releases material? Because when a material has more space it simply explodes to smaller particles or more accurately lose a piece of it a photon there is a hidden question here in which iam developing an answer to
What evidence do you have that a neutron can be absorbed by a neutron or a proton. Based on all known physics this is impossible. If a proton could absorb a neutron then there should be some protons that are twice the mass of a normal proton. Same with the neutron. So without compelling evidence this can be disgarded as completely wrong.
Why does U235 undergo fission when a neutron is added and U238 does not undergo fission with the addition of a neutron?
Why does adding a neutron to certain atoms cause no effect, cause beta minus decay, cause beta plus decay or simply the release of a gamma ray?
Pls note that all these are hard questions that I fear may be hard to answer but since there is no way of escaping smart scientists I will surely try to answer
Hello I was afraid of being rejected needed to change my whole mind ok so I believe we will be able to discuss freely no all questions answers prepared this is better was afraid from ppl being aggressive towards it and so here we go
Now the first question how do u know that a neutron won't be absorbed by a proton? As far as I have searched I found that no one was able to see the atoms
And now the second question good question
Separate names with a comma.