Theory of gravity

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by jcc, Jul 2, 2015.

  1. jcc Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    412
    my theory is electrostatic induction force between atoms/masses/bodies causes gravity.

    neutral atoms/matters has no net charge, but electrostatic induction between charges within atoms will end up a net attraction force, which is proportional to total charges within matters.

    the fact that two separate magnets in free space will end up attract each other no matter pole directions is due to similar em induction.

    from Fg=G x m1m2/r^2 and Fe=Ke x q1q2/r^2, we see the similarity.

    all we need to prove is m1=q1=total charges within, m1=q2=total charges within.

    as i said earlier in my theory, 3 building blocks make up atoms.

    proton carries 900 positive charges, electron carries 1 negative charge, enertron carries tiny negative charge, but it has more charge to volume ratio than electron.

    a proton can never be observed by itself, proton is deep hidden within a dense enertron ball. atom is like earth, proton is the core, enertron is the dirt, electron is giant beach ball.

    electron can never get inside of atom radius, that's why atoms are not compressible, no discharge within atom.

    proton attracts -899 energtron and 1 electron to become neutral charged atom.

    we can not detect enertron because it is too small and attracted by proton more strongly than electron.

    when proton beams impact, in fact is proton/enertron balls impact, enertron balls explode, produce all kinds of em phenomena.

    without charges, there is no force, there is no mass. cus you cannot measure mass without using force.

    1 atomic mass equals to 1800 total charges, no matter the sign of the charge, that's why proton weight 1800 times electron weight but only carries 1 positive charge, the rest 899 positive charge is used up to balance -899 enertron ball.

    a hydrogen atom is made of +900 charged proton surrounded by -899 charged enertron ball, add 1 electron on the outer sphere.

    the atom has 2 force fields, positive field fp=ke x 900/r^2, negative field fe=ke x -900/r^2.

    those positive and negative fields between atoms/matters interact/induction becomes bounding/gravitation.

    now let's prove mass=total charge

    1 neutron contains 1 proton and 1 electron, total charge 1800. equal to hydrogen atom total charge/mass.

    all we need is an induction constant C* to convert Fg=G x m1m2/r^2 into Fe=Ke x q1q2/r^2.

    C* x m=q, where m is mass, q is its equivalent induction charge carried.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. jcc Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    412
    without gravity, we'll be float like blooms.

    without gravity, we can't even make love.

    solute to gravity!
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    What's enertron?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. jcc Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    412
    a tiny negative charged particle, something maybe like 1/10-23 of an electron charge.

    think it is like elastic fluid. condensed around proton. proton's force field strength f=ke x proton charge/r^2, therefore the fluid density d=1/r^3.
     
  8. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Isn't that one of the Tranformers©?
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    You do not have a theory. You have nothing more than an unsupported hypothesis.
    That's total word salad.
    Protons are observed as ions and anode rays and are observed in particle accelerators.
    Protons were first discovered by Rutherford and shown to be made up of other particles called quarks in experiments in the SLA.
    Atoms are compressible and you have been told this many times. Are you trolling again?

    In essence, what you are claiming is Impossible, as we have undeniable evidence of other facts.
     
  10. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    And why do you think your negatively charged elastic fluid exists?

    Because you want it to? That's not good enough.
     
  11. jcc Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    412
    fair enough. just an assumption.
     

Share This Page