Nor did I intend the use of 'wrong'. You can safely assume that I'm not trying to say things I don't say. And you really should knock off the ego stroking. I get where Dr_Toad is coming from. Indeed! You made my point. If one wanted the public to believe something other than the facts immediately present, one would have had to state the narrative. We'd be getting the reporter's rhetoric and analysis. However, without the added rhetoric, examining just question and answer, the narrative doesn't need to be manipulated. It stands on its own. It seems we have a difference in tastes. You like your news filtered through someone's opinion. I like to go to the raw data so I can decide for myself.