This History Will Be

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by JJM, Mar 28, 2014.

  1. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    Since compressed compression pressure density as gravity density is composed of collision, friction and motion, an interesting event would be for someone to compute the collision, and friction force energy by subtracting the motion. Which is 2,855,000 miles per hour, at 800 miles per second. Translate the velocity to ke force compression density.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. reverse square (r^2). square root 1-(r^2/E) @ {[1'/1] (^2)}. what does that do for the observable universe? (reverse ^2)(forward^2) = 1
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2017
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. StrangerInAStrangeLand SubQuantum Mechanic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,695
    ^^^
    You cannot know that.
    It is not inevitable.

    <>
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. TheFrogger Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    752
    But I can know that. If it is possible then it will be realised (if not already.)
     
  8. StrangerInAStrangeLand SubQuantum Mechanic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,695
    ^^^
    How can you think you know that?

    <>
     
  9. TheFrogger Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    752
    It is inevitable...
     
  10. StrangerInAStrangeLand SubQuantum Mechanic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,695
    ^^^
    No.

    <>
     
  11. TheFrogger Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    752
    Yes! ☺
     
  12. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    M/M Counter, thank you for your concern, and consideration. M/M Stranger in A Strange Land, and M/M Kristoffer.....Non exhaust thrust faster than light is very simply shown in the 'garden analogy' where AE and IN were playing with apples and each added their own Lawful Observations technically to the apples and when combined the apples became something new, and reached different places when thrown in the air, while some landed on earth, others landed at other place's.That is the first two acts, the third is the most necessary of all, and it is the basic of both.......Some fun.....Force Reverse ^2 + Force Forward ^2 =1 KE Force ^4 @ compressed compression pressure density, easier said Force mass is m when accelerating with Reverse and Forward force as ke inertia. Enough of that. Think in terms of what happens to an object in motion when either of it's 1^2 energy is interfered with. Reverse or Forward. Reducing or eliminating either one increases the other! Increasing either one or the other varies it's 'mass acceleration', ie it's motion velocity weight! Change one, the other at the same time changes. Stop an object in flight, increase R^2. Increase the velocity of an object in flight decrease R^2.....so M/M Kristoffer doe this make sense to you?
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2017
  13. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    Learn to mechanically create and manipulate the R^2 and the F^2. There is a lot of 'newness' there that can and will be useful. New tools, using a new force.
     
  14. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    As f increases r increases, as f decreases r decreases. FORCE(r^2 + f^2)=1^4 KE inertia Force mass @ Force is the mass @ f=ma. since r^2 =f^2, then each is 1/2 of the kinetic mass inertia ^4, so ke = 1/2 m v^2. ,,,,,,so as f approaches zero, r also approaches zero......can any of that be mechanically influenced as/for a stylistically induced variation? Do you think any 'work' can come from that? From the inside of the ma, change mechanically the r to f ratio. since only one order of expression is the ma as linear momentum, what about angular momentum with its own ke inertia ma, and curvi-linear momentum with its own ke inertia ma. not only in a three dimension frame but as a four dimensional multiple spiral curvi-linear trajectory all at the same time. Since each momentum is its own 1^4, and not counting the spiral, then 1^12 ke inertia is for the three orders of magnitudes but only in the fraction of 1/ 3(1^4)......force action forward and opposite and equal reaction is force action reverse. what does that say for the formation of dm......a note to Dennis 616 .....astute. I have an affinity for the USA and it is there that it shall be. You will never know one way or the other. Not anyone will ever never know. Even nasa is backwards when it comes to secrets, and for the treasures which is American. All they can do is to destroy it and give everything away.....There is only one country that espouses Life, Liberty. Freedom, Independence applied and only one ism, that is American Capitalism. The rest of the world may try and say it but they don't practice it. Can you picture a democrat saying that you are an independent entity and have the right of Being for you to be that what you want, without any violence or government being involved. Actually American Values contradict every government on the earth.
     
  15. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    The drought of summer is over and today I tasted the sweetness of fresh water. School is back up and running and today I had my first seminar. It was on massive stars and their properties. Most interesting. The only thing wrong that I saw, from my perspective is the absence of dm as morphological source. Classicalist must employ classicalism. The work was done with computer animation given the observed data that they had. The program was excellent, only they don't know about compressed compression pressure density geometrically stylistically, but they will and it will be employed.....They have confusions in the development of the states.
     
  16. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    Hello.......M. StrangerinAStrangeLand, beware of the hall effect, its' electrifying, literally. M. Dennis616, The majority of 'scientists' do not accept as true that dm can collide, or even have any inkling of that which is the formal event of dm. There are many forms of it. Since it is momentum, invisible, geometrical not only spherical, stylistically formed by its larger events. In many instances it 'acts' like a geometrical vacuum. It is not composed by 'particles' but by momentum force . Were one interested in observing it, one would have to created a vacuum within the center of a material that can register any vacuum resonance along its atomic boundary. The boundary of the vacuum must be at the internal surface registering material without any interference by any inter spacial boundary, like an ice. The material will have to show the change in surface continuity as state variation. i.e. expansion, resonance, slight ionization, bond releases by vacuum strengths versus states bonding, changes in territorial lock step resonance should show direction of source. In nature when applied, dm is in a state of periodicity. It will give change to everything that it has formed. as an example, within the bases at the center of jets the particles forming volume metrically. The pulses of the dm create variation in the tpmv per area per 'atomic-bunch'. Remember clapping your hands? Internal resonances. .......While on the subject lets get something straight. Compressed compression pressure density geometrically stylistically create most of the atoms of the universe, as well as planets, stars, galaxies, galaxy clusters. I personally have difficulty with 'filaments' since they are based on zeta and objects may have inherent styles that portray an event even if the event is not really an active 'red-shift' but may act like it.
     
  17. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    for within all mass in motion (acceleration)@ forward momentum ^2 +reverse momentum^2 = 1^4 inertia kinetic energy pressure density @ energy of force @ compressed compression pressure density @ ma + Fa=-Fb (every action has (is) an equal and opposite reaction)......How many ways can you produce a vacuum?.....
     
  18. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,247
    I'm a teapot.
     
  19. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    4 Newtonian Laws + "Big Bang" = ? ----"CMB" ? Law 1 + bb, How? Law 2 when combined with Law 3 F bar, which means a reverse. Law 4 means 'expansion particles' attracted each other and should not have stopped. There was something else to stop the total gravitational attraction of all the particles.......Are you Lipton? take tea and see?
     
  20. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,009
    That's a meaningless statement. You might as well say, "If pigs can fly, the world will end next Tuesday at 2:56 PM GMT." Without a verified premise, there's no point in drawing a conclusion.
     
  21. TheFrogger Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    752
    Not really. If something is possible, it inevitably will happen. Eventually.
     
  22. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    1+1 bar... 1, at rest(+- 0 velocity) unless imposed upon or internal/external agitation. 1 bar, bar not being anti, but opposite and/or in addition too) ie. motion, linear, angular, curvi-linear. However as a recent observation attests, gravity is mass. and according to me mass is Inertia^4 as produced by the Laws of collision, friction, and motion, so that 'thing' that was the bb singularity must have a formation process. Since it is geometrical/stylistically, with density, then 'something' of a larger size collided. frictionalized and was in motion to implant I^4.+++, whereas every interaction added to the 'mass' density its' own I^4. ,,,,,,,,,as for 'expansion', 'explosion', ' release of 'bond' ?????,,,,,,,a mechanical geometrical energy duration variation from within its' creation, an external coupling outside of itself similar to an energetic vacuum density ????......should 2+2 bar be alone or is it critically interspersed by necessity with 3+3 bar?
     
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2017
  23. JJM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    329
    Howdy, Hello,,,,,,It's been awhile. Newton is music, his laws are intertwined such that each predicts the rest. #2 states f=ma, (1)simply the amount of acceleration of a mass is proportional to the mass density resistance to motion as potential energy and the amount of force pressure density to move the mass. Ke=1/2 mv^2 is that which states that 1/2 of the motion is a forward force, only there is not only a forward, there is a backwards within the mass as the forward accelerates.; forward force ^2 and reverse force^2 equals ke^2=mv^4 which is inertia to the fourth. Which is formed as compressed compression pressure density, which is mass, which is gravity. However one must not think that is the totality of g, because it is also formed as I^4 within and by collision, and friction laws, not just the motion laws. They all form I^4. Each style of action produces gravity. (2) The force in F=ma, also radiates off of the mass in front of the mass, aside of the mass, atop of the mass, behind the mass. For every motion the mass has an opposite and equal and opposite motion-force exists.(#3 f+=f-) (3) Which makes this interesting in the form of, from, bb. The opposite of expansion is the return of acceleration force to the position from whence it began in the first place. All of the 'outward' expansion motion in reverse returns to its place of origin. So what happens to that amount of force? By definition it must become and be aligned geometrically stylistically, with an amount of mechanical duration with geometrical evolution......I seem to enjoy that the bb mass is a simple collision. The collision is comprised of fields, some thick, some thin, some short, some long. compression strengths of varying amounts with some areas between fields void of compression forces. Like normal collisions. With 'jets' on each side. So there is a question. Did bb expand on both sides, geometrically. Since there is this beautiful layering in a collision within its each territory, a simple analogy would be a skipping stone on water. With the stone being flat and others being more bottom rounded. Each bounce is a layering territory. The stones producing a collision, and friction mass geometrically stylistically.
     

Share This Page