Yes the science is what matters and also the person: In the latter your's qualifications are questionable at best and your citations, references supporting your hypothetical, non existent. Plus of course your rather silly rhetoric again changes nothing and the fact remains that what you point out [re the H/T system] and what you ignore, is totally unscientific and invalid, and changes nothing in the greater [or lesser] scheme of things. The H/T system and gravitational waves have been researched for 40 years by expert professionals, and the results and methodology beyond question. That's the way it is at this time, and I'll bet my short n curlies, that's the way it will be tomorrow. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! The H/T papers discussed magnetic fields and other factors: The overwhelming result and interpretation stands as is, not withstanding your own fabricated version on a remote public science forum that means exactly SFA! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Well at least you have withdrawn some of your previous outright claims! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! But as an unknown amateur in this field, you need to now bow to the superior knowledge of the recognised professionals, instead of cling forlornly to your dreams of invalidating accepted mainstream science, which will never be done from public forums...agreed? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Calm down, your overly pretentious excitement is impressing no one, least of all me. At best your own expertise and credentials are unknown.....at worst taking into account the many other denials by yourself of mainstream cosmology, and requests re support for your claims by others, that have all been ignored, you appear to be conducting some sort of evangelistic mission: Which from the realms of a public forum means SFA as I have just said. There are proper avenues for you to take if you genuinly have evidence to invalidate any of those many mainstream theories and claims. But that also like other requests will be ignored, and consequently an unfavourable light thrown on whatever credibility you have. Cosmological redshift is a recognised fact: spacetime curvature in the preence of mass is a recognised prediction of GR: gravitational lensing is also accepted and observed as such: gravitational waves are recently confirmed in line with GR and any reasonable definition of a scientific theory: likewise BH's: likewise DM. Those entities and effects are not fairy tales and to argue or even suggest that they are is to show ignorance of 21st century cosmology, and possibly reveal an agenda of sorts. To hide behind the fabricated nonsense that all you are doing is "questioning" the results and interpretations, considering all requests to support your "questionings" or whatever you are implying, have all strangely gone unanswered, which again suggests an agenda of sorts. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Who cares what some agenda driven, unqualified lay person, who is unable to support anything he ever says, despite requests from many, including James, thinks or pretends he knows? No conflation necessary and that is recognised by your "so called questioning" which others also, including James seems to have interpreted as denial. At this stage, I see your excitement is building, and the usual lengthy rhetoric continues unabated. So we'll just bypass the nonsensical approach reflected in your posts and say that again, "No physicist has ever said that wormholes categorically do not exist"