That's not fair, the "so worm holes must exist" conclusion I have not seen from paddoboy. If he has made such a claim, link please.
No, I have not said worm holes do exist.
Wow! and you were going OK there for a while.Of course, to cry "No scientist worth his salt has categorically denied existence of Worm Holes" is quite meaningless, given that the variant "No scientist worth his salt has categorically claimed existence of Worm Holes" has not been rejected too. So, it makes sense to ask what would be the point of this claim, if it is not to suggest that wormholes exist. But this is another question.
The point of the claim is that we cannot be at this stage, 100% sure either way.
So let me rephrase my little sentence.
No physicist will ever say categorically, that worm holes do or do not exist.
But that has been obvious since the OP and paper.