UFO; Friend or Foe?

Discussion in 'UFOs, Ghosts and Monsters' started by HawkI, Oct 12, 2020.

?

UFO; Friend or Foe?

  1. Friend

    1 vote(s)
    50.0%
  2. Foe

    1 vote(s)
    50.0%
  1. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    Because they are real but unknown. They are unexplained UFO's.
    Is this what they all said? Are they scientists? Are they familiar with all sorts of atmospheric disturbances, and phenomena?

    Again, as I have said many times, there is absolutely no sense, rhyme nor reason, as to why Aliens continue to flitter in and flitter out again, with making some official contact, or landing on the Sydney Opera House forecourt, or Westminster, or the White House lawns. This isn't a case or a comparison of us to ants on an ant hill. To any advanced civilisation, it would be obvious that we are "somewhat" intelligent...afterall, we have mastered heavier then air flight, and NEO, and trips to the Moon.

    And again while I firmly and positively believe we are not alone, as yet we do not have the required evidence to support any thought of life off this fart arse little blue orb.
    Oh, yes, and I have seen my own UFO, and that's what it remains, a UFO, unidentified.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    And claiming that Aliens have conducted a atomic war on Mars is not nonsense? Or claiming that the Moon does not rotate is not also nonsense? Or that water is poisonous is not nonsense?
    Would it be fair then for me to remark that your comment on others spouting nonsense is a case of the Pot calling the Kettle black? You do understand what that means river?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river

    Messages:
    15,706
    Prove that it is not nonsense .

    I retracted that mistake pad . You are acting more like a politician than one of science .

    Water is poisonous ? If it is polluted with dangerous chemicals .
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    You prove that what was said is nonsense...afterall you made the first claim in post 98.
    It wasn't a mistake. It was an example of your totally illogical reasoning and anti mainstream science stance. To even contemplate such nonsense is crazy.
    Stop being so dishonestly obtuse river...No one drinks water that is polluted. Water is not poisonous...you were wrong again in claiming it is.
     
  8. river

    Messages:
    15,706
    True Gibberish .
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    And why you are confined to the fringes.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Are you so gullible as to believe anyone on this forum accepts any of your nonsense? The answer obviously is yes.
     
  10. river

    Messages:
    15,706
    Such as whom ?
     
  11. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,120
    There you go pad. Even river can't imagine who might believe his nonsense.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    paddoboy likes this.
  12. river

    Messages:
    15,706
    None think that they are gullible , and nor do I .
     
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2020
  13. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,028
    Not a single occurrence of the word alien in the lengthy Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event
    From the beginning it was thought to be either a comet or asteroid/meteoroid air burst event. Wild speculation of exploding alien spacecraft e.g.
    https://www.ufoinsight.com/conspiracy/historical/the-tunguska-incident
    bears zero relevance to the naval multiple UAP encounters of 2004 and 2014-2015, the latter happening on a daily basis according to fighter pilots involved. 'cubes inside of spheres' buzzing the super hornets in near collisions. Oh yeah, that sounds so ordinary. Not.
    And how long did that stunt fool the authorities? A day at most? Again, no comparison at all to the 2004, 2014-2015 naval multiple encounters that after careful scrutiny remain xlassified as unexplained by navy and Pentagon spokespersons. Synchronized state-of-the-art radar and FLIR and trained observers visual confirmations of objects having completely inappropriate aerodynamic design undergoing at times hypersonic motions without any associated sonic booms. Similarly with the 2004 tic tac encounters. So very mundane. Not.
    I enjoyed watching those MIB movies too. So?
     
  14. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,028
    You keep thinking these 'flitter in and flitter out' UAP encounters are to be treated as supposed nuts and bolts spacecraft piloted by flesh and blood humanoid aliens. How many times have I explained that is far from my conception of what is going on? In one ear, out the other. Sigh.
     
  15. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    My point is that they are simply unexplained...not anything in particular, and far less likely to be Alien controlled or Alien robotically controlled.
    If I have missed something my apologies, blame MR and/or river, with the total overall nonsense claimed by this pair over many posts.
     
  16. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,037
    I think you use the term "gibberish" to replace what most people would consider "logic." Which is fine, if somewhat sad.
     
  17. river

    Messages:
    15,706
    No , gibberish is gibberish ,( non-sense ) .
     
  18. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    He has a problem with logic and knowledge and science and the mainstream.
     
  19. HawkI Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    301
    After having watched the last Episode of 'Dakota's Destination Fear' yesterday on Television. (A real life documentary Ghost Show.) I have been assured that I'm not gullible. They mentioned they were filming in an American State known for UFO activity, bobbing in an'out the Sea.
     
  20. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,133
    I think you meant to post this in the humor section.
     
  21. HawkI Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    301
    When Albert Einstien had the chance to be the first to publish the expansion of the Universe is accelerating, but bottled out of doing so, he felt really silly when someone published it after him.

    I wonder how silly you will feel when the Para-Normal (UFOs proved to be true etc) becomes Normal?

    Edit:-
    Behaviour that may get you banned
    • Personal attacks on another member, including name-calling.
    I think we're ok here because Origin underestimates my sincerity on my not feeling Gullible comment.
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2020
  22. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,037
    That has happened hundreds of times. A sighting that someone is 100% convinced is a UFO turns out to be a normal aircraft.
     
  23. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,133
    He didn't feel silly, since he had been dead for over 40 years before the discovery of the acceleration!
    I didn't call you a name, however you certainly are extremely gullible to think a silly tv program is true.
    I think you are sincere, which is rather sad.
     
    HawkI likes this.

Share This Page