UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

Is that your reply to the idea of '' intelligent life 'out there' that won't mind communicating with us just for purely inquisitive reasons.'' ?
You have been on Earth too long. How does it go... Nature is red in tooth and claw.... You got to have a master, be it overlord aliens or gods....

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Rather than unicorns an rainbows... i thank it more likely to be qurosity killed the cat.!!!

Spoiler

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Maybe all James is saying Q-reeus is that if you believe in alien life without evidence (beyond the stories of claimants), that’s your choice but don’t be angry if scientists don’t take it seriously. Not sure the science community is completely closed minded to the possibility that alien life may exist, it just doesn’t feel that what has been so far presented is enough to be certain of it.

You don’t need the “blessing” of the science community to believe that the photos and stories of alien UFO’s are credible...to you.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Looks like it's up to me again to do the right thing and alert viewers here to the fact James R has snipped a number of posts continuing on from #5183 , to a thread in Site Feedback here:
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/q-reeus-complains-about-being-moderated.164794

 

Well James R as righteous overlord has passed semi-divine judgement on me yet again. Who am I as mere mortal to contend with that! Case closed!

 

Detail and background can be all important in forming a truly informed, objective viewpoint re reality of nonmundane UFO/UAP etc. phenomena and reliability of reported/recorded encounters.
Here is a two-part recorded interview with David Fravor that imo well fulfills those criteria:


There are of course other such interviews, and ones that include corroborative testimony from other aircrew (and shipborne radar operators etc.) intimately involved with the encounter(s) back in 2004.

 

Well well well. Link to detailed testimony from a confirmed top gun veteran, with reliably corroborated, first-hand experience of a well recorded/observed UFO/UAP encounter, and deafening silence from the SF debunker crew results.
Oh yeah, it does get harder and harder for the debunker/skeptics brigade to keep pushing their 'but you haven't PROVED it!' stupid-as narrative. And I note the absence of any support from former allies here. Not hard to guess why - 'hate speech' accusations trigger automatic programmed revulsion reactions. Neat. PC correctness is very, very deeply embedded in far too many 'liberty loving' citizens who actually aren't but can't recognize that. Well better add - imo.

 

From what I’ve been reading about the “tic tac” UFO sighting, it’s not that the government or science community is dismissing the sightings completely as being imagined/hallucinations or whatever ...it’s that they’re not convinced it’s alien technology.

I’m not scared really of the idea of alien life existing (many people assume if they do, that they’re dangerous and hateful - maybe they’re nothing like that), but if this technology is a glimpse of perhaps another country’s advanced technology, that would be more concerning, don’t you think?

 

Thanks for responding wegs. I'll assume you watched at least Part 1 of those two vids linked to last post (annoyingly Part 2 is interspersed with repeat chunks from Part 1). Where David Fravor recounted in particular his prior training and experience as a marine and naval airman. And the detail of his (and three other aircrew) engagement with the tic tac on the fateful day. The as he put it 'physics defying' antics, ability to jam their sophisticated anti-jamming capable radars, and bewildering pre-knowledge that had it back at their prearranged CAP point way in advance of Fravor and fellow pilot(s), left them in awe. Oh I left out hypersonic speeds without any sonic boom generated. Fravor himself is cautious and believes such 'advanced tech' is way beyond any human capabilities. Thus 'not of this world' in his words.

Some other 'UFO celebs' publicly at least push the notion the tic tacs may have been leap-frog advanced tech drones by Russia or China. Fravor's detailed account sinks that totally imo.

 

Appalling of you to cast Fravor in such a demeaning light. Without any justifiable basis for doing so.
Another testimony, written in 'digital stone', to your hypocrisy and double standards. That provocative invite to engage in a desired continual back-and-forth grind, is best imo declined.

 

Typical skeptic strategy to poison the well by attacking the honesty and character of Fravor. Free lunches? lol!

 

You insinuated Fravor was motivated by attention seeking, and money. Disgusting.
Instead of engaging in attempted smearing, make a first attempt ever at actually dealing with the details of what he recounted. Show convincingly how it could all be rationally put down to some bizarre combination of equipment malfunction and human misperception. Good luck!

 

Do some searching. There have been quite a few others interviewed, including with respect the numerous East Coast Eisenhower carrier group UFO/UAP encounters.

 

Forget what? You are fantasizing or simply outright lying as usual. Point to your supposed 'in depth' review. Bluffing.