UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

LOL No it isn't. She corroborates what Fravor saw. That is 100 % corroboration of his account. It doesn't get any better than this.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Not if she's agreeing with his account.That means she knows what his account is, tainting her own.

It has to be HER experience in HER words, isolated from his and not contaminated. Then it is up to analysts to determine if the two accounts corroborate each other.

Otherwise her corroboration is effectively worthless.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

No it doesn't. The account is both her's and Fravors, as spoken by Fravor. It's ridiculous to repeat the same account when it has already been given.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yup. As you say: It's ridiculous to repeat the same account when it has already been given.

That's a single data point. Not two. There are not two accounts here, there is only one.

 

A single account corroborated by TWO eyewitnesses. Remember that..

 

The problem is, one person cannot say what another person saw. Not and have it count as an eyewitness statement.

 

Yep. HE said HE saw is a duplicate NOT a NEW account

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Another can say they saw the same thing someone else said they saw. That's called corroboration.

 

That works when it comes to explicable things, like "I saw a red car speeding away", but it actually hurts when applied to trying to divine the nature of a mystery, such as "It appeared to be approximately 10 miles away and made no sound." The whole point of solving such a mystery is to seek out independent encounters.

And without independent accounts, it only counts once.

 

No it doesn't. Two eyewitnesses to an event are two eyewitnesses to an event. When they agree on the same account, they are said to corroborate each other. That's basic common sense. The sighting of the ufo was corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses and radar. How many more times must this be said?

 

And where, exactly, can we find her eyewitness statement? If we don't get her eyewitness account then we only have one.

 

https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/s...y-pilot-recalls-tic-tac-encounter-2021-06-25/

Dietrich's account of the "tic tac" or "white blob" is given in the video...

 

Wow. That's even more useless then I thought.

Was she told the whole thing had to fit on the back of a stamp?
Not a single value, number, angle, distance estimation anywhere to be found.
What kind of pilot gives an account like that?

She'd be more credible if she described her cousin's friend's balls in Trinidad.

 

Well what books have you read on the topic of UFO's ?

 

I never claimed that. I said her account collaborates Fravor's account, which it does. Multiple eyewitnesses backed up by video and radar.