Not at all. I'm interested in discussing it - as I always have been. Discussion is why you posted it, right? We've got an opportunity here to examine an uncommon facet of eyewitness reports: a claim about an observation that is directly verifiable via the witness' own video footage. This is useful data in studying the larger picture of accuracy in eyewitness reports. I assume you are interested in objectively analyzing the report you posted - warts and all. This is your chance to show that you're not just here to cheerlead for alien-piloted craft.