Update: Christian woman sentenced to death for blasphemy

I've found that rhetoric employing the word "peace" generally tends to make a lot more sense if you bear in mind that 95% of the human population confuses "peace" with "victory."

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

SAM we as a world we should learn from history especially because of what Chistianity wrought. I mean their prophet is Jesus and he did not promote violence according to written accounts, and we see how that turned out!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Exactly, which is why we must focus on obscure villages where vague sentences are not carried out rather than entire states targeting civilians with advanced weaponry for no comprehensible reasons.

 

Now lets take a look at Islams' prophet Mohammed, who does promote violence against non-muslims and then by knowing the history of violence in the name of religion, we should all be vigilant . Nothing is chickenfeed here.

 

No disagreement here!

 

Exactly, so go back to the obscure village and rant against the sentence that was not carried out.

 

I would give a nasty bum (not just a homeless person, an nasty bum-there's levels to homelessness) water and food.
However, since I have chronic sinusitis of heroic proportions, I'm not sure anyone should be drinking after me in an unwashed glass.
I also kiss my dogs a lot, even the old one who raids the cat litter box for tootsie rolls as soon as we're not looking.

I'm not just unclean for religious reasons

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

uke:

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

But...um, I kind of don't like to see people who don't use their religion as an excuse to abuse people blamed for their co-religionists' behavior? It bothers me.
I don't like bigotry, y'all. I get the receiving end of it too often.

I hadn't heard about this whole topic, btw, and I think it's really very interesting, the fact that these religious laws are starting to be objected to by the people who have the religion and live in the culture.

Being the heathen I am, I generally think that the unpopularity of these laws is a good thing and needs to continue.

Ironic we seem to be going in the other direction here in the US, no?

 

I have read many of Chis' threads on other forms and have not seen him/her behave in the same manner as he/she behaved in this partcular thread. I personally found his/her posts offensive and I behaved in like manner. Mea culpa.

 

Ooops...I think I must have hit der button twice by mistake...carry on...

 

Good call,


I read most of the convosation about me that somehow didn;t include me and I dont wish to comment on it other than maybe stress 1 minor miss-conception.


I am heading out to Mount Sinai on a peacefull Pilgrimage to renew a covenant with God, I will not be going anywhere near those people who are fighting I want no part in violent protests, It just happens to be all kicking off at the time I already planned to go.


Peace.



Peace.

 

Oh, I'm sure you would depending on the person. Sure, if a random person asked you for your water, you'd probably not drink after them because you'd worry about communicable diseases (and it is an unusual request). Dying of thirst is a sign of certain diseases. Bigotry of 3000 years ago probably made good sense in terms of not spreading disease. Sadly, what was initially a simple idea to keep the more moronic of society from bringing disease into the village (Jimmy! Stop doing THAT to that goat right now! It's unclean). Has turned into outright Religious Bigotry.

This goes to the fundamental flaw in the theology itself. It's what happens when you base your entire religion around the "Appeal to the Sky Daddy" fallacy. Logic goes bye bye.

I've been at many sporing events where I've shared water with strangers. I've shared sips of drinks with strangers. Gee I've even swapped spit with, what one could conciser, a relative strange woman, now and again

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Anyone who things God is talking to them, has issues.

 

Thats all very well, but thats not the main issue here. The main issue is that people are justifiably offended that whatshername underwent due process in whatchamacallit village for allegedly breaking the law and was released by the judge when he determined that the prosecution had not made a valid case and the lower court was wrong.

Just listen to the unreasonable demands of the sharia oppressed country:

How dare they?:bugeye:


This clearly proves that Muslims are barbaric villains who are behind the times. Everyone knows that due process is no longer followed and people of other religions are usually killed for no reason at all or put into communication management units for indefinite periods if they are not otherwise outsourced for rendition or torture. That's the modern secular democratic way of doing this stuff.

When will the Pakistanis catch up?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Serving up red herring are we?

You may want to remember, in the Last Crusade, it was the Christians who sided with and protected Muslims from Russia. If it weren't for Christians dyeing to protect Muslims, Istanbul would be a part of Russia today.

All societies fought wars. Even tribes on Easter Island fought wars with one another. What's important is that we reconcile with one another and are able to move forward. To do that we need to recognize the families of ideas that promote Bigotry. Such ideas form the bases of superstitions such as Christianity, Judaism and Islam. Islam being the worse of the three.

 

That is a disgusting judgement upon "Asia", how diss-honourable now they have blood on their hands, for every drop of blood you spill you will be compensated.


Peace.

 

So the fact that Asia bibi is the first person since US supported dictator Zia ul Haq imposed the Hudood laws to be sentenced by a lower court for blasphemy - said sentence most likely to be turned over by high court or pardoned by President, is evidence of the role of Islamic superstition in promoting bigotry?

Tsk tsk. Maybe they should just aim a drone at her house and kill her along with her children. That kind of stuff is more rational and easy to accept considering how the last 900 people killed in Pakistan by that method seem to have no one to stand up for them.

 

blah blah blah

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Not swapping half eaten food is cultural and has nothing to do with perceived "religion" or "race". For example, in the far East, China, Korea and Japan, they use chopsticks to "handle food" such that it's a part of their culture you don't "share" food directly from person to person, but, from table to person. Whether it's a Hong Kong rotatory table or individual yum cha/dim sim, or sushi - food is packed and served in a way that is not shared person to person. Can you see the difference with THAT and not sharing water with someone because they are black? Or a Christian?

I'm sure you can, even as it conflicts with your need to be an Islamic Apologist.

 

communal eating thread here:
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=2687079#post2687079