they were on their way there. before they had arrived it was already looted. Which goes to show that the US didn't have enough men to do the job. Of all the sites in Iraq to be secured first and foremost it should fmr. nuclear installations, hmm...? Wouldn't that make sense taking into consideration that the whole purpose of this idiotically wasteful war was over those same installations? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! The fact that the US secured the oil ministry before any other is an indication that this war was a farce. and nico, the man did not say a thing about Iraq or Saddam, except that the Americans are being very brutal in Fallujah Either you are lying, or you have a early stage of Alzheimer's I will quote: So which am I to believe othhy? -or- I am at a loss for words honestly. and he did not "regurgitate Zionist propaganda". he's a historian and he presented some very interesting things. Well since I wasn't there I cannot pass much judgement but I wouldn't put to much into a man who was sponsered to come to the university by Halhal or whatever that Zionist organization calls itself. saddam was not sparking the whole thing, he was using a flamethrower. And now you revert to this statement wow, where is your head at? Saddam was a threat...back in the 80's when we supported him by taking him off the terrorist supporting list, giving him Anthrax, nuclear weapons technology, reactors, advanced radars, missiles, satellite photo's of Iranian positions, etc. The only thing here that is using a flamethrower is hypocrisy. Saddam was a grave threat to everyone's interests, not just the US, by being sparky. anyway, that's a whole different debate. How was Saddam of 2003 a threat to anyone? I know Zionists love to equate threat to Israel with the world. But I would love to hear how this works. i didn't rank the armies in order of strength, but in order of amount of weapons. please read carefully. such assumptions and bad reading skills will get you D's in university. You were implying that, and you even said: In your infintile sarcasm implying that there was a order of strength otherwise knowing that Saddam's military was a shit box. I don't understand you would state the sarcasm. Sorry what get's ppl D's is not owning up to his own assertions when confronted. the weapons were there, available for just about anyone to grab, including those who Saddam gave the weapons to. You're going to have to prove that, you have to show me when, where, to whom, etc. Saddam gave these weapons to? Merely saying it does not mean it happened. if u don't agree that's fine. that's all i'm gonna say about that You are a misguided child, do you even get the difference btwn belief and informed opinion until you get to the cognitive stage of the latter there is no hope.