Of course it is. And it's a bad one, with insertions to fix the parts you don't like. They don't seem to comprehend that "him" in Genesis 1 is singular. But I'm not a Christian, and neither are most of the posters in this thread. We have no vested interest in agreeing with the Christians. We just happen to agree on what Genesis plainly says. Of course it does, in Genesis 1 and Genesis 2. And also: 1 Corinthians 15:45 - And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam [was made] a quickening spirit.And also: Isaiah 43:27 - Thy first father hath sinned, and thy teachers have transgressed against me.(relating the "first father" - i.e. the original human - with the sin of Adam in Genesis 3. Indeed, the Bible is wrong about the biology and the history. But that doesn't change what the story actually says. You can't change the story to shoehorn it into biology and history. For the same reason that I'm convinced that Goldilocks and the Three Bears has talking bears in it - because that's what the story says. And that's how we know the story is fiction.