What did Einstein mean by space-time being interwoven?

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Tyler Shaw, Nov 12, 2021.

Not open for further replies.
1. originHeading towards oblivionValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,777
Incorrect. If you google misconceptions about the expansion of space, your assertion is number 1 or 2.

3. originHeading towards oblivionValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,777
Please supply a citation that supports this assertion, you could do that when you are looking up the other citation I asked for, bro.

5. Tyler ShawBannedBanned

Messages:
76

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime

''In physics, spacetime is any mathematical model which fuses the three dimensions of space and the one dimension of time into a single four-dimensional manifold. ''

There you go bro , there is one of them .

Here is another link and quote :

''The expansion of the universe is the increase in distance between any two given gravitationally unbound parts of the observable universe with time.[1] It is an intrinsic expansion whereby the scale of space itself changes. The universe does not expand "into" anything and does not require space to exist "outside" it.'' '

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe

That is false , a metric expansion is a physical motion and physical motion requires physical space !

Last edited: Nov 13, 2021

7. foghornValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,285
Sean Carroll recommended this Arxiv paper (Tamara M. Davis Charles H. Lineweaver ) to help with confusion over expansion.
''Expanding Confusion: common misconceptions of cosmological horizons and the superluminal expansion of the universe''
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310808

8. Tyler ShawBannedBanned

Messages:
76
Anyone who writes a paper that contests the expansion of space knows that paper would not be accepted . The paper link you provided is a ..''to keep the peace'' paper but also contradictory . A velocity is a motion , a speed and direction . The red-shift observed is of visual bodies , not of space . There is no evidence that space is red-shifting .
There is no reason the red-shift can't be related to the Doppler shift because the red-shift is surface emissions !

9. originHeading towards oblivionValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,777
Sorry dude, we all know what space-time is, the question I asked is what is this "space-time energy" that you used in this statement:
Maybe you just misspoke?
So you are saying that this mainstream physics is wrong?

10. originHeading towards oblivionValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,777
Actually there are many reasons that show space is expanding. Here are a few; the farther an object is from us the faster it's recession velocity, all distant objects (beyond our gravity bound galactic cluster) are moving away from us and the most distant objects have a recession velocity exceeding c.

11. Tyler ShawBannedBanned

Messages:
76
I have read somewhere before bro the term space-time energy unless I dreamt I did bu anyhow bro space-time energy is the energy that is between bodies that is indistinguishable from space . Between you and the moon is space-time energy and this energy can curve bro towards masses , in fact bro I'd bet that bodies in motion are in motion because space-time energy curves towards the bodies direction and pulls the object along by space-time energy warping . Newton and Einstein laws of motion bro , a body in motion will remain in motion because of space-time energy curvature . Far fetched maybe bu sounds rather cool .

12. exchemistValued Senior Member

Messages:
12,078
What happened to "pal", Jimmy?

13. Tyler ShawBannedBanned

Messages:
76
Well pal you are wrecking this thread with your religious links and snooping of my personal details , go harass someone whom is lost in life .

14. originHeading towards oblivionValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,777
That is just word salad. Are you a sock puppet of a banned former member, per chance??

15. Tyler ShawBannedBanned

Messages:
76
wa you talking about dude ? That isn't what you call word salad at all , perhaps it is beyond your comprehension ? Bro , between you and any object do you observe a metric measure of space ? If you live on Earth in that metric volume exists space-time energy (quantum fields) . You can not see this space-time energy because it is transparent and does not affect light .

OK now bro , you got that ?

16. KristofferGiant HyraxValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,362
He does the same weird space at the end of his sentences as the last sock we saw here.
You know ?! That.

exchemist likes this.
17. Tyler ShawBannedBanned

Messages:
76
The wa and you wa ?

Spoiling a good thread ma dear can you kindly move on , rather chat than be in love .

18. KristofferGiant HyraxValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,362
Good thread? Nah, but I'll leave you to ramble on until you get booted.

19. originHeading towards oblivionValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,777
This a horrible thread. You say silly stuff, you get correct, you ignore the correction and say more silly stuff.

Just like the last time you were here as a sock puppet...

Kristoffer likes this.
20. Tyler ShawBannedBanned

Messages:
76
We'd hardly warmed up in this thread ma dear , why not stick around and you might learn something that you misunderstood from your education .

Do you know that your own neurological reference frame is corrupted by trying to improve that what was presented before our time in the incorrect context ?

The big bang theory based on Einsteins space-time and so on which has lead to Chinese whispers and misunderstandings by the populous .
Space is not expanding , that is a misconception of the populous , proper scientists know this .

21. KristofferGiant HyraxValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,362
Jerimiah! That was the previous iteration of this guy.
Same nutty style.

22. Tyler ShawBannedBanned

Messages:
76
Your own misconceptions is misguiding you bro ,

23. Tyler ShawBannedBanned

Messages:
76
So you failed your education in reality and believe in quack science ?