What do girls want?

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by spidergoat, Jul 1, 2017.

  1. Yazata Valued Senior Member

    Didn't Freud ask that question?

    I'm inclined to say that many are confused about that. Oftentimes what they say they want isn't what their behavior suggests they really want.

    And I think that it's pretty clear that they don't all want the same thing.
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  3. billvon Valued Senior Member

    In other words - they are a lot like men.
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  5. gmilam Valued Senior Member

    But yet, they still get girls. Go figure...
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  7. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    My guess is... most of those girls didnt get enuff good positive attenton from care givers.!!!
  8. pluto2 Banned Valued Senior Member

    These days girls are only after looks and money.

    This is why it's so hard to get a girlfriend or any kind of affection from girls.

    Seriously American women have ridicously high standards when it comes to men.

    Take Elliot Rodger for example: I think he was a gentleman and also not ugly by any standards but American women still rejected him left and right until he became severely depressed.
  9. billvon Valued Senior Member

    You must know all the wrong women.
  10. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Maybe your goofy misogynistic attitude shown in the first sentence leads to the out come of the second sentence.

    I find that girls are pretty much like regular people...

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    sideshowbob likes this.
  11. gamelord Registered Senior Member

    Elliot Rodger was batshit insane and this is coming from someone who usually looks up to villians in movies.

    Elliot Rodger was a man who wanted to ban sex and put all women in concentration camps and have a man's only society, which he didn't realize would obviously would be the equivalent of a giant gay bathhouse. Still your hero? Because he's not mine.
  12. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Really, your example is a piece of shit, psycho murderer? Are you nutz by any chance?????
  13. gamelord Registered Senior Member

    Your comment loosely implicates that all murderers are to be viewed as piece of shit, psycho murderers.

    This I resent, as there are nobles among us, men driven to the edge, there is a certain glory to the lawless vigilante who takes justice into his own hands, dealing the final blow to the wicked and injust. As I said before I often root for villians of movies.

    That being said, Eliot Rodgers really was a piece of shit, psycho murderer, and I doubt pluto2 would idolize him if he really knew what he was about (banning sex, creating a man only society, torture, etc.) Further the people he killed were mostly nerdy virgin asians, and nerdy unpopular girls, many of whom were in the same boat as himself, so he was both a failure and a traitor towards his own cause.
  14. billvon Valued Senior Member

    No it doesn't. There are ordinary murderers; people who rob a liquor store and shoot someone although they didn't intend to when they started the robbery. There are also piece of shit psycho murderers like Rogers.
    And even more glory for the cop that shoots him dead and ends his threat to others.
  15. gamelord Registered Senior Member

    So you are a cop sympathizer, someone who obediently enforces laws and rules? Dogma?

    Need I remind you of the atrocities of the ancient catholic church, and their obedient knights and enforcers... A society which obediently respects the laws of the land is not not a society I respect.

    For me morality is always more important than law, and "It is the law" is a non-argument.
  16. billvon Valued Senior Member

    If it comes to cops vs. murderers, I am firmly on the side of the cops.
    OK. Good luck in finding a lawless society. I hear Syria, Somalia and Honduras are pretty good in that respect.
  17. gamelord Registered Senior Member

    I am not for full lawlessness or savagery. I am just for a society which is above the dogma and rote enforcement.
  18. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Agreed. I am generally for obeying laws unless there's a good moral reason to not do so.
  19. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

  20. river

    naturallygorg likes this.
  21. gamelord Registered Senior Member

    I agree. Many modern feminist women are not for equality anymore. They just want to rise above men and keep men down.

    For example, feminists say they should be allowed to be sluts and wear sexy clothes. But where are they defending the man's right to wear makeup and sexy clothes? Where do they defend's man's right to be a slut and have sex with as many women as he pleases? No, they praise themselves for being a slut but shame men for being sluts. In fact, some of these TERF feminists deny a man's right to have a sex change and be a beautiful woman who wears cool clothes.

    I believe the true feminists of equality are the feminists who support musicians such as David Bowie and Michael Jackson, men who wore makeup, slutty men of glamour. This is the type of Feminist I would wish to marry. But where are these feminists now? I see no men on makeup anymore on stage. Where is the equality when men are no longer allowed to be beautiful? People like Marilyn Manson are not on CNN anymore, all you get is generic cis men. Feminism does not stand for equality.

    I am the one who stands for Equality. I believe Women should get equal pay as man. It makes no sense, legally speaking, that they receive less pay for the same job. Women should also be equal to die on the Titanic. If there is a Titanic I demand that an equal amount of women die as the men. If there is a World War, I demand that an equal amount of female soldiers be drafted and die. If there is sexual frustration in a nation, I demand that an equal amount of women be as incel as men. I am all for equality. I believe Women should play NFL football in the same league as men, since women want to be equal to men after all. NFL is boring without women in it.

    Moderns are not really for equality. For instance, if a black person fails a test, they get paid fines and fees, and have to restructure their tests so that blacks have an advantage. I am saying if a black fails at the same test a white person has to take, so be it, they shouldn't be forced to pay fines and fees because the black person happened to fail. I am saying all races should be given the same tests, it is racist to go easy on black people and make whites have a harder time of it than minority races.

    I am all for equality. Anyone with an IQ less than 125 should not be allowed to vote or be a politician. This is fair standard and empirical. If a woman has a 130 IQ she should be allowed to vote. If a man has a 130 IQ he should be allowed to vote. It's that simple. It is nonsensical that a 150 IQ is forced to obey the laws rules and dogma of someone with a 100 IQ. It is nonsensical that the visionary, free thinker free spirit has to follows the laws rules and dogma of a simpleton. It is like a Great Tiger, having to obey the laws and rules of a mouse.
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2018
  22. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    If that's true, then it's not working too well for them, is it? Women are still paid less than men, on average, for doing the same job. The vast majority of CEOs are still men. Men outnumber women in politics. The "glass ceiling" is still alive and well in many corporations. I could go on.

    Women should not have to dress a certain way to try to minimise their chances of being attacked or raped by a man.

    Why can't the men stand up for themselves in that regard? If you want to wear makeup and sexy clothes, what's stopping you, as a man? Feminists? I don't think so.

    Who are these feminists who have the power to deny a man's right to have a sex change?

    Ah yes, the poor downtrodden super-rich pop stars. They need all the feminist help they can get.

    Statistically, the survival rate for men is higher than for women and children in shipping disasters. Think about that.

    And yet, some women have been struggling for years to be allowed into combat roles, and have been denied by men.

    Underneath it all, it sounds like you're angry at women.

    Equality does not mean being the same.

    Why not have a women's NFL league, where the women get the kinds of salaries, promotion and fame that the men get?

    Moderns? As opposed to ... who? Ancients?


    That's discriminatory. You'll have to explain how this is "equal".

    Why? Do you think having a high IQ gives you some kind of entitlement over people with low IQs?

    You live in a democracy, don't you? What do you think that means? Do you think you have a better system?
  23. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    (William F. Buckley, Jr., who was in the last cadre of conservatives that were not wrong all the time. )

Share This Page